The Islamic College Scholarship of Future: From Educational Dualism to Integration of Science

Authors

  • Miftahul Huda Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Rhoni Rodin IAIN Curup

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v16i1.6188

Keywords:

Islamic Religious College, dualism education, scientific integration

Abstract

The dichotomy of education that has swept the Islamic world is recognized as having created split of Muslim personalities. Educational institutions produce experts who are qualified in spiritual-transcendental issues, but unable to face the objective reality of social life that demands attention to every change that occurs. On the other hand, experts born from the world of general education institutions are very smart in dealing with the realities of social life, experts in the fields of science technology, economics, politics, and so on. However, it is not uncommon for people to be completely dry, even devoid of spirituality, which causes their lives to be unsettling and at the same time detrimental to personal, family and community life. This study uses a qualitative approach, with a literature review method. The results show that the dichotomy of science is the separation between religious and general disciplines, which in turn gives birth to a new term called educational dualism, namely religious education and general education. The dichotomous view that separates the religious sciences and general sciences is contrary to the concept of Islamic teaching which has integralistic teachings. Islam teaches that the affairs of the world are not separate from the affairs of the hereafter. The implication is that when referring to Islamic teachings, general sciences should be understood as an inseparable part of the religious sciences. The Islamic Religious College (STAIN / IAIN / UIN) must have the courage to review the vision, mission, and scientific paradigm that it has built over the past few decades. The aim of STAIN / IAIN / UIN as a Religious Higher Education needs to be oriented towards the birth of a bachelor who has three abilities at once, namely the ability to analyze academically, the ability to innovate and the ability to lead according to the demands of social, scientific, and professional problems in one breath of ethos. scientific and religious.

References

Abdul Wahab. (2013). Dualisme Pendidikan Di Indonesia. Lentera pendidikan Jurnal Ilmu tarbiyah dan Keguruan Vol. 16 No. 2, 2013. Abdul Basyit. (2019). Dikotomi Dan Dualisme Pendidikan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Tahdzibi: Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Vol. 4 No. 1 Mei 2019. Website : jurnal.umj.ac.id/index.php/Tahdzibi. Abdul Wahid. (2014). Dikotomi Ilmu Pengetahuan (Science Dichotomy), Istiqra’ Vol. 1 No. 2 Maret 2014. Adnan Mahdi. (2012). Dikotomi dan Dualisme dalam Pendidikan di Indonesia. https://4dn4nm4hd1.wordpress.com/2012/09/14/dikotomi-dan-dualisme-dalam-pendidikan-di-indonesia Ahmad Syafi’I Ma’arif. (1991). Pemikiran Tentang pembaharuan Pendidikan Islam di Indonesia dalam Muslih Usa (ed.), Pendidikan Islam di Indonesia: Antara Cita dan Fakta. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana Yogya. Akhmad Asyari dan Rusni Bil Makruf. (2014) Dikotomi Pendidikan Islam: Akar Historis dan Dikotomisasi Ilmu. Jurnal El-Hikmah, Volume 8, Nomor 2, Desember 2014. Affandi Mochtar. (1998). STAIN atau IAIN Mini: Mempertanyakan Arah Pengembangan Pendidikan Tinggi Islam negeri”, dalam PERTA Jurnal Komunikasi Perguruan Tinggi Islam, Vol. II, No. 1 September 1998. Abdullah, Amin. (2010). Islamic Studies di Perguruan Tinggi, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Amrullah Achmad, Kerangka Dasar masalah paradigma pendidikan Islam, dalam Muslih Usa (ed.), Pendidikan Islam di Indonesia: Antara Cita dan Fakta. Baker, Osman. (1994). Tauhid dan Sains: Esai-esai tentang Sejarah dan Filsafat Sains, Bandung: Pustaka Hidayah. Departemen Pendidikan & Kebudayaan. (1990). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka. Fathorrahman Z. (2017). Problematika Dualisme Ideologi Dan Kelembagaan Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Kabilah Vol. 2 No. 1 Juni 2017. Fauzan Suwito. (2004). Perkembangan Pendidikan Islam di Nusantara, Studi Perkembangan Sejarah dari Abad 13 hingga Abad 20 M. Bandung: Angkasa. Husni Rahim, (2000). Arah Baru Pendidikan Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Logos Wacana Ilmu. Isma’il Raji al-Faruqi. (1984). Islamisasi Pengetahuan, terj. Anas Wahyuddin. Bandung: Pustaka. John M. Echols & Hassan Shadily. (1992). Kamus Inggris-Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Utama. Maksum. (1999). Madrasah: Sejarah dan Perkembangannya. Jakarta: Logos Wacana Ilmu. Mastuhu. (1999). Memberdayakan Sistem Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: logis. Mochtar, Affandi (Ed.). (1996). Lektur Pendidikan Islam, Seri IV, Cirebon P41 Fak. Tarbiyah IAIN Sunan Gunung Jati Noeng Muhajir. (1999). Integrasi Filosofis Ilmu dengan Wahyu: Pengembangan Metodologi Telaah Ilmu Masa Depan”, dalam Fuaduddin dan Cik Hasan basri, Dinamika Pemikiran Islam di Perguruan Tinggi: Wacana Tentang Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jakarta: Logos Wacana Ilmu. Nurhayati Djamas. (2009). Dinamika Pendidikan Islam di Indonesia Pasca Kemerdekaan. Jakarta: PT RajaGradindo Persada. Samrin. (2013) Dikhotomi ilmu dan dualism pendidikan. Jurnal Al-Ta’dib Vol. 6 No. 1 Januari-Juni 2013. Sumarsono Mestoko. (1979). Pendidikan Indonesia dari Jaman ke Jaman. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI. Syed Sajjad Husain dan Syed Ali Ashraf. (2000). Krisis dalam Pendidikan Islam. Alih bahasa dari Crisis in Muslim Education oleh Fadhlan Mudhafir. Jakarta: Al-Mawardi Prima. Yayan Rusyanto, (2019). Indonesia Masih Menghadapi Masalah dalam Pendidikan. https://siedoo.com/berita-22005-indonesia-masih-menghadapi-masalah-dalam-pendidikan/ Zaenal Mustakim. (2013). Mengawinkan keilmuan: upaya mengakhiri dikotomi dan mengintegrasikan keilmuan dalam pendidikan islam. Forum Tarbiyah Vol. 11, No. 2, Desember 2013. Zuhairini dkk. (2008). Sejarah Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta, Bumi Aksara.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-01

How to Cite

Huda, M., & Rodin, R. (2021). The Islamic College Scholarship of Future: From Educational Dualism to Integration of Science. At-Ta’dib, 16(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v16i1.6188