ANALISIS TINDAK PIDANA MARITAL RAPE (KEKERASAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ISTRI) MENURUT HUKUM POSITIF DAN HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM (STUDI KOMPARATIF KASUS PUTUSAN PERKARA NO. 150/ Pid.Sus/ 2017/ PN. Bkl)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21111/jicl.v4i1.5942Abstract
Abstract: A harmonious household is the hope for every husband and wife couple. However, domestic violence is now the main cause of the collapse of the harmony that has been built in a family, due to family problems or economic conditions that trigger domestic violence. The purpose of this research is to find out how judges consider the criminal case of marital rape (sexual violence against wives) and to find out how the legal analysis of this crime is in Islamic criminal law. This research is a library research (Library Research), by collecting data from written sources from books, journals, or magazines that match the title, and also from the Supreme Court Directory website regarding the verdict on the crime of Marital Rape. The results of this study state that the judge's verdict in cases with case numbers. 150 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN. Bkl is not in accordance with the Law that regulates this matter, because basically if there is no reason for the wife's forgiveness for the husband's actions, there will be no leniency or reduction of the sentence to 1 year in prison. And the sentence imposed by the judge in this case, if analyzed with a review of Islamic criminal law, is Qishas or it can be completely replaced with a diyat if it is forgiven by the victim or the victim's guardian. As for the diyat that will be dropped for people who have injured the head to the brain, and injured the body to the stomach, by paying the diyat one-third of the mukhaffafah diyat. Then if the diyat cannot be paid with a camel, it must be paid for the camel's price. Some ulama 'said that it was permissible to pay 12,000 dirhams (about 37.44 kg of silver) or with a measure of Rp. 11,861.00, the diyat that the defendant had to pay was Rp. 42.524. 573,00.Keywords: Judge's Consideration, Marital Rape, Law, ExcusesReferences
Ali, Mahrus. 2012. Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana, Cet. 2, Edisi-1, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Adonara, Firman Floranta. “Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Sebagai Amanat Konstitusiâ€, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 1, No. 2, Juni 2015.
Afriani, Tati. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Yang dilakukan Suami Terhadap Istriâ€, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, edisi 6, Vol. 2.
Etwiory, Herlina. “Kajian Yuridis Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga (Suatu Studi Tentang Hubungan Hukum Privat dan Hukum Publik)â€, Jurnal Lex Crimen, vol. 1, No. 3, Jul-Sep, 2012.
Huda, Ni’matul. “Kedudukan peraturan daerah dalam hierarki peraturan perundang-undanganâ€, Jurnal Hukum No. 1, Vol. 13, Januari 2006.
Jamaa, La. “Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Pespektif Fikihâ€, Jurnal Ahkam, Vol. XIII, No. 1, Januari 2013.
Latipulhayat, Atip. “Hans Kelsenâ€, Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 1, tahun 2014.
Moeljatno. 2015. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rinea Cipta.
Moonti, Roy Marthen. 2017. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan, Makassar: Keretakupa.
Najih, Mokhammad dan Soimin. 2016. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia (Sejarah, Konsep dan Politik Hukum Indonesia), Malang: Setara Press.
Rusianto, Agus. 2016. Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Jakarta: Predanamedia.
Shiddiqie, Jimly. M. Ali Safa’at. 2006. Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jendral & Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
Sukardi, Didi. “Kajian Kekerasan Rumah Tangga Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positifâ€, Jurnal Mahkamah, Vol. 9, No. 1, Januari-Juni, 2015.
Sukardi, Didi, Agus Abikusna, dkk. “Pendampingan Hukum Terhadap Korban Marital Rape Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tanggaâ€, Jurnal Mahkamah, Vol. 4, No. 1, Juni 2019.
Thohari, Fuad. 2016. Hadis Ahkam: Kajian Hadis-hadis Hukum Pidana Islam (Hudud, Qishas, dan Ta’zir), Jakarta: Deepublish.
Nurwahidah, “Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Diluar Pengadilan Menurut Hukum Islamâ€, Jurnal Ittihad Kopertais Wilayah XI Kalimantan, Vol. 13, No. 23 April 2015.
https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/0e487f59eb75e9fb79361629b8a1db63.html, Di Akses Pada tanggal 15 Oktober 2020.
https://www.rupiah365.com/Perak , 5 Maret 2021, Pukul 16:00.
Pasal 4 ayat 1 UU No. 4 Tahun 2004 tentang Ketentuan-ketentuan Pokok Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
أبي Ø£Øمد، بن Ø£Øمد. أبو بكر علاء الدين السمرقندي،1414 Ù‡-1994 Ù…. تØÙØ© الÙقهاء، بيروت، لبنان: دار الكتب العلمية.
البغدادي، أبو الØسن علي بن Ù…Øمد بن Ù…Øمد بن Øبيب البصري. 1441 Ù‡- 1994 Ù… الØاوي ÙÙŠ Ùقه الشاÙعي، بغداد: دار الكتب العلمية.
ابن Ù…ÙÙ„ØØŒ إبراهيم بن Ù…Øمد بن عبد الله بن Ù…Øمد ØŒ ابو إسØاق، برهان الدين، 1423 Ù‡-2003 Ù…. المبدع ÙÙŠ Ø´Ø±Ø Ø§Ù„Ù…Ù‚Ù†Ø¹ØŒ الرياض: دار عالم الكتب.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author whose published manuscript approved the following provisions:
- The right of publication of all material published in the journal / published in the JICL is held by the editorial board with the knowledge of the author (moral rights remain the author of the script).
- The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which means that JICL reserves the right to save, transmit media or format, Database), maintain, and publish articles without requesting permission from the Author as long as it keeps the Author's name as the owner of Copyright.
- Printed and electronic published manuscripts are open access for educational, research and library purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.
