THE DILEMMA OF DUAL OVERSIGHT BETWEEN THE KPK AND SOES IN HARMONIZING ACCOUNTABLE AND TRANSPARENT STATE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Authors

  • Amirullah Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Sri Rahayu IAIN Palopo
  • Afifulloh Universitas Brawijaya
  • Ayu Febi Febrianti Universitas Ichsan Sidenreng Rappang
  • Mutmainnah UIN Alauddin Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/jicl.v8i3.15213

Keywords:

KPK, BUMN, Dual Oversight, Regulatory Harmonization, Good Governance

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dilemma of dual oversight between the Corruption Eradication Commission and State-Owned Enterprises within Indonesia’s positive legal framework. The core issue arises from overlapping authorities following the amendment of Law No. 19 of 2019 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, which created disharmony between public oversight functions and corporate autonomy. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutoryand conceptual approaches. The findings reveal that the intersection between the Corruption Eradication Commission Law and the State-Owned Enterprises Law has caused authority fragmentation and normative confusion in the state financial supervision system. This condition weakens Corruption Eradication Commission independence and increases the risk of impunity in state corporate management. The study recommends legal reform through the establishment of an integrated legal framework that strengthens inter-agency coordination and regulatory harmonization across sectors. In conclusion, aligning the legal frameworks governing Corruption Eradication Commission and State-Owned Enterprises oversight is essential to reinforce anti-corruption effectiveness and to realize a transparent, accountable, and equitable governance system for state enterprises.

References

Adni, Dita Fisdian, Christine B Tenorio, and Evi Zubaidah. “Political Dynamics of Innovative Policy Development in Managing Forest Fires in Riau Province.” International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering 15, no. 4 (April 2025). https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.150406.

Anam, P. A., and I. Rahadiyan. “Pengaturan Jabatan Rangkap Direksi Dan Komisaris BUMN: Perbandingan Indonesia Dan Amerika Serikat.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 30, no. 1 (2023). https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/view/24028.

Budiman, M. (2021). Tantangan Dan Isu Strategis Gerakan Antikorupsi Terkini. Syntax Idea. Link. n.d.

Buscaglia, E., & Dakolias, M. (1999). Comparative International Study of Court Performance Indicators: A Descriptive and Analytical Account. The World Bank Legal Review. n.d.

Butt, S. “Indonesia’s Anti-Corruption Reforms: The Reversal of Fortune.” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 56, no. 3 (2020): 365–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2020.1825256.

Conran, Richard M., Carrie A. Elzie, Barbara E. Knollmann-Ritschel, Ronald E. Domen, and Suzanne Zein-Eldin Powell. “Due Process in Medical Education: Legal Considerations.” Academic Pathology 5 (2018): 2374289518807460. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374289518807460.

Chairana, R., Melayu, H. A., & Jalil, H. A. (2025). Tinjauan Fiqh Siyasah Terhadap Implementasi Qanun Kota Banda Aceh Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 Tentang Kota Layak Anak. Ijtihad, 19(1), 63-76.

Disemadi, H. S., & Wahyuningrum, K. S. (2020). Independensi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi: Benarkah Ada? Refleksi Hukum. Link. n.d.

Djamhuri, A. Penguatan Tata Kelola BUMN Di Indonesia: Antara Efisiensi Dan Pengawasan Publik. Jakarta: LP3ES, 2020.

Harahap, M. Y. “Reformasi Kelembagaan Negara Dan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemerintahan 11, no. 2 (2021): 123–40.

———. “Reformasi Kelembagaan Negara Dan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemerintahan 11, no. 2 (2021): 123–40.

Juwono, V., and M. Mietzner. “The KPK, Corruption, and the Decline of Reformasi in Indonesia.” Asian Survey 61, no. 2 (2021): 345–72. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2021.61.2.345.

Mahardika, Nur Gemilang. “Fleksibilitas Hukum Dalam Sistem Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Hukum, 2023.

Manullang, S. O., & Kusumadewi, Y. (2023). Problematika Hukum Atas Perubahan UU KPK. Jurnal on Law and Justice. Link. n.d.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press. n.d.

Quah, J. S. T. (2010). Combating Corruption in the Asia-Pacific Countries: What Do We Know and What Needs to Be Done? International Public Management Review, 11(2), 5–33. n.d.

Rahadiyan, I. “Good Corporate Governance Dan Posisi Dewan Pengawas BUMN.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 30, no. 1 (2023). https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/view/24028.

Rose, Geoffrey. “E-Bikes and Urban Transportation: Emerging Issues and Unresolved Questions.” Transportation 39, no. 1 (January 2012): 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9328-y.

Saragih, A. “Hukum Bisnis Negara Dan Konstitusionalitas Status BUMN.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 18, no. 4 (2021): 201–20.

Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. SAGE Publications. n.d.

Simanjuntak, B. H. “Harmonisasi Hukum Publik Dan Privat Dalam Status BUMN.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 1 (2020): 89–107.

Utama, A. S. “Independensi Pengawasan Terhadap Bank BUMN Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional.” Soumatera Law Review 4, no. 2 (2018). https://ejournal.kopertis10.or.id/index.php/soumlaw/article/view/3312.

Wibangsa, P., Saputra, A. D., & Agam, F. B. (2025). Penegakan Hukum Dan Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia. Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial. Link. n.d.

Wibowo, T. “Konflik Regulasi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Korupsi Di BUMN.” Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy 8, no. 2 (2021): 77–95.

World Bank. (2007). Strengthening World Bank Group Engagement on Governance and Anticorruption. Https://Documents.Worldbank.Org. n.d.

Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2003 tentang BUMN, Pasal 2 ayat (1) dan Pasal 15.

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 tentang KPK, Pasal 1 angka 1 jo. Pasal 6.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 62/PUU-XI/2013 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 48/PUU-XVII/2019.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10

How to Cite

Amirullah, Rahayu , S. ., Afifulloh, Febrianti, A. F. ., & Mutmainnah. (2025). THE DILEMMA OF DUAL OVERSIGHT BETWEEN THE KPK AND SOES IN HARMONIZING ACCOUNTABLE AND TRANSPARENT STATE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE . Journal of Indonesian Comparative of Syari’ah Law, 8(3), 733–748. https://doi.org/10.21111/jicl.v8i3.15213

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): Journal oF Indonesian Comparative of Syariah Law (JICL): Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Hukum Islam

Section

Ilmu Hukum

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The author whose published manuscript approved the following provisions:

  1. The right of publication of all material published in the journal / published in the JICL is held by the editorial board with the knowledge of the author (moral rights remain the author of the script).
  2. The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which means that JICL reserves the right to save, transmit media or format, Database), maintain, and publish articles without requesting permission from the Author as long as it keeps the Author's name as the owner of Copyright.
  3. Printed and electronic published manuscripts are open access for educational, research and library purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.