ANALISIS PRINSIP AL-ADALAH DALAM PUTUSAN PTUN NOMOR 604/G/2023/PTUN.JKT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21111/jicl.v8i3.14848Keywords:
Al-Adalah, PTUN, Anwar Usman, Constitution CourtAbstract
The decision of the Jakarta State Administrative Court (PTUN) in Case Number 604/G/2023/PTUN.JKT, which annulled the Presidential Decree reappointing Anwar Usman as Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court, has sparked public debate regarding ethical governance and the principle of justice in state administration. This study aims to analyze the concept of justice (al-ʿadālah) from the perspective of siyāsah dustūriyyah and how it is reflected in the court's legal considerations. Using a normative juridical method with a qualitative approach, this research examines the alignment between Islamic constitutional theory and the values upheld in the PTUN ruling. The findings reveal that the judges emphasized impartiality, moral integrity, and the protection of public trust in state institutions—principles that resonate with the Islamic vision of justice, where leaders must be free from conflicts of interest and accountable for public duties. The study concludes that the PTUN decision embodies aspects of administrative justice that are in harmony with Al-Adalah ethics, and it highlights the critical role of legal oversight in preventing abuse of executive power in high-level appointments.References
al-Ghazali, Imam. Nasihat Al-Muluk. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1987.
Al-Māwardī. Al-Aḥkām Al-Sulṭāniyyah. A. Hanafi Abbasy (Trans.). Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar, 2000.
“Al-Qur’an.” Madinah: Mujamma’ Malik Fahd li Ṭibāʿat al-Muṣḥaf al-Sharīf, n.d.
Al-Qur’an. “Surah An-Nisa (4): 58,” n.d.
al-Raysuni, Ahmad. Nazariyyat Al-Maqasid ‘inda Al-Imam Al-Shatibi. Beirut: Dar al-Nafais, 1992.
al-Raysūnī, Aḥmad. Naẓariyyat Al-Maqāṣid ‘inda Al-Imām Al-Syāṭibī. Rabat: Dār al-Kalīm li al-Nasyr, 1992.
al-Zuḥaylī, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh Al-Islami Wa Adillatuhu. Vol. 8. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 2007.
Amsari, Feri. “Putusan PTUN Janggal Dan Berbahaya.” Media Indonesia, n.d. https://mediaindonesia.com/opini/718071/putusan-ptun-janggal-dan-berbahaya.
Apriliany, Adinda. “Analisis Sistem PTUN Dalam Konteks Ketatanegaraan.” Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan 5, no. 7 (2024): 47.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Teori Dan Praktik. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2011.
———. Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005.
———. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2006.
az-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh Al-Islami Wa Adillatuh, Jilid VI. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr, 1985.
Hadjon, Philipus M. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2019.
Harjiyatni, Francisca R, and Suswoto. “The Role of Administrative Courts in Upholding Islamic Governance.” International Journal of Islamic and Civilisational Law 12, no. 3 (2024): 210–28.
“HR. Bukhari No. 7146 Dan Muslim No. 1733,” n.d.
HR, Ridwan. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2012.
Indrati, Maria Farida. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2007.
Isra, Saldi. “Konstitusionalitas Tindakan Presiden Dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 27, no. 1 (2020): 45.
Jahar, Asep Saepudin. “Siyasah Dusturiyah: Teori Politik Dan Ketatanegaraan Dalam Islam.” Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 15, no. 1 (2017): 66.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
MD, Mahfud. Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara Pasca-Amandemen Konstitusi. Jakarta: LP3ES, 2007.
———. Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945. Jakarta: LP3ES, 2009.
———. “PTUN Salah Alamat.” Tempo, n.d. https://tempo.co.
Media Indonesia. “Putusan Anwar Usman: Jalan Tengah Keadilan Administratif.” n.d. https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/718456/putusan-anwar-usman-jalan-tengah-keadilan-administratif.
Nasution, Adnan Buyung. Amandemen Konstitusi Dan Reformasi Kelembagaan Negara. Jakarta: Forum Konstitusi, 2015.
ND, Mukti Fajar, and Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2017.
Putusan PTUN Jakarta No. 604/G/2023/PTUN.JKT (2023).
Ramadhan, Fahmi. “Telaah Kritis Kewenangan PTUN Dalam Sengketa Etik Lembaga Tinggi Negara.” Jurnal Ijtihad UNIDA 19, no. 1 (2024): 44.
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2006.
Sunggono, Bambang. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2011.
Susanti, Bivitri. “Presiden Tak Boleh Abaikan MKMK.” Jurnal Konstitusi 21, no. 3 (2023): 94–96.
Syahidin, Rosyad, and Dewi Sulastri. “Kontrol Yudisial Terhadap Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Serambi Hukum 18, no. 2 (2023): 57–60.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Taymiyyah, Ibn. Al-Siyasah Al-Syarʿiyyah Fī Iṣlāḥ Al-Rāʿī Wa Al-Raʿiyyah. Kairo: Maktabah al-Salafiyah, 1971.
———. As-Siyasah Asy-Syar’iyyah Fi Ishlah Ar-Ra’i Wa Ar-Ra’iyyah. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 1998.
Tempo.co. “PTUN Kabulkan Gugatan Anwar Usman, Ini Dampaknya Terhadap Mahkamah Konstitusi.” n.d. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1859613/putusan-ptun-anwar-usman.
Tempo.co. “PTUN Kabulkan Gugatan Anwar Usman Soal Pemulihan Martabat, Tapi Tolak Kembalikan Jabatan Ketua MK.” n.d. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1859613/putusan-ptun-anwar-usman.
TV One News. “Gugatan Anwar Usman Dikabulkan, PTUN: Pengangkatan Suhartoyo Sebagai Ketua MK Dinyatakan Tidak Sah.” 2024. https://www.tvonenews.com/berita/nasional/236152-gugatan-anwar-usman-dikabulkan-ptun-pengangkatan-suhartoyo-sebagai-ketua-mk-dinyatakan-tidak-sah.
“Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan,” 2014.
“Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Sebagaimana Telah Diubah Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2004 Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009.” Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, 1986.
Winarta, Frans Hendra. Hukum Administrasi Negara Dan Good Governance. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.
Zaydan, ‘Abd al-Karim. Nizam Al-Hukm Fi Al-Islam. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risalah, 1994.
Zaydān, ʿAbd al-Karīm. Nizhām Al-Ḥukm Fī Al-Islām. Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Risālah, 1994.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author whose published manuscript approved the following provisions:
- The right of publication of all material published in the journal / published in the JICL is held by the editorial board with the knowledge of the author (moral rights remain the author of the script).
- The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which means that JICL reserves the right to save, transmit media or format, Database), maintain, and publish articles without requesting permission from the Author as long as it keeps the Author's name as the owner of Copyright.
- Printed and electronic published manuscripts are open access for educational, research and library purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.
