Rekayasa Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Lomba Desa Tingkat Kabupaten dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21111/fij.v4i2.3441Keywords:
Lomba Desa, SPK, AHP, Kabupaten Bangka TengahAbstract
AbstrakLomba desa adalah sebuah sarana untuk menilai dan memonitor kemajuan desa secara berkala di suatu Kecamatan. Lomba Desa tingkat Kabupaten membutuhkan tim penilai dari perwakilan Kecamatan dan staf bidang pemerintaan di Kabupaten. Masalah yang dihadapi oleh tim penilai adalah sulitnya membuat keputusan objektif. Hal ini disebabkan lomba desa mempunyai kriteria cukup banyak yaitu, pendidikan, kesehatan masyarakat, ekonomi masyarakat, keamanan dan ketertiban, pemerintahan, partisipasi masyarakat, lembaga kemasyarakatan, dan pemberdayaan & kesejahteraan keluarga (PKK). Berdasarkan fakta bahwa lomba desa adalah sistem multi kriteria dan multi alternatif, maka penelitian ini mengusulkan sebuah Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (SPK) dengan metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). AHP dianggap sesuai karena metode ini menghasilkan keputusan objektif dari kondisi multi kriteria dan multi alternatif seperti pada lomba desa. Lokasi penelitian ini adalah Kecamatan Pangkalan Baru di Kabupaten Bangka Tengah Provinsi Bangka Belitung. Proses pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan observasi, wawancara, dan kuesioner. Pengolahan data dikalkulasi dengan metode AHP, untuk memastikan validitas data dan penggabungan hasil perhitungan gabungan beberapa anggota tim penilai dapat menggunakan aplikasi Expert Choice. SPK ini adalah pengembangan sistem yang bertujuan mengubah pengambilan keputusan dalam lomba desa sehingga desa terpilih dapat menjadi acuan bagi desa lainnya, dan desa yang belum terpilih juga dapat evaluasi kelemahan desanya. Hasil penelitian memberikan keputusan yang mampu menekan kemungkinan protes atau ketidakpuasan dari peserta lainnya. Dimasa depan penelitian ini dapat dikembangkan menjadi sistem pendukung keputusan berbasis web.Kata kunci: Lomba Desa, SPK, AHP, Kabupaten Bangka Tengah Abstract[Decision Support System Engineering in District-level Village Contest using Analytical Hierarchy Process Method]. Village competition is a means to assess and monitor village progress in a Sub-district periodically. The Village Competition at the Regency level requires an assessment team from representatives of the sub-district and staff in the field of government in the Regency. The problem faced by the assessment team is the difficulty of making objective decisions. It is because the village competition has quite a lot of criteria namely, education, public health, community economy, security and order, governance, community participation, social institutions, and family empowerment & welfare. The village competition system which has many assessment criteria makes this system suitable using a decision support system with the AHP method. The location of this research is Pangkalan Baru Subdistrict in Central Bangka Regency, Bangka Belitung Province. The process of collecting data is done through observation, interviews, and questionnaires. Data processing is calculated by the AHP method, to ensure the validity of the data and the combination of the results of the combined calculations of several members of the assessment team can use the Expert Choice application. This SPK is the development of a system that aims to change decision making in village competitions so that selected villages can become a reference for other villages, and villages that have not been selected can also evaluate the weaknesses of their villages. The results of the study provide decisions that are able to suppress the possibility of protest or dissatisfaction from other participants. In the future, this research can be developed into a web-based decision support system.Keywords: Village Contest, DSS, AHP, Central Bangka RegencyReferences
[1] Presiden Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa, no. 1. 2014.[2] Menteri Dalam Negeri and Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesi No.81 Tahun 2015 tentang Evaluasi Perkembangan Desa dan Kelurahan. 2015.[3] I. R. Pratiwi, A. S. Sitio, and A. Sindar, “Pemilihan Desa Terbaik Di Kecamatan Pagar Merbau Menggunakan Metode Ahp,” JSAI, vol. 1, no. November, pp. 59–65, 2018.[4] M. Syafiih and M. Furqan, “Peningkatan Pemerataan Pembangunan Melalui Pemilihan Desa Terbaik di Kabupaten Probolinggo dengagn (TOPSIS),” CYBER‐TECHN, vol. 13, no. 01, pp. 1–6, 2018.[5] A. Gazali and R. Arnie, “Model Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Desa Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Weighting Product,” vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 925–932, 2016.[6] R. Nugraha, G. Abdillah, and R. Ilyas, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Desa Terbaik di Kabupaten Cianjur Menggunakan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process dan Weighted Product,” in Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Multimedia 2018, 2018, pp. 37–42.[7] K. D. Goepel and B. Performance, “Comparison of Judgment Scales of the Analytical Hierarchy Process - A New Approach,” no. 2012, pp. 1–15, 2017.[8] M. A. Marhraoui and A. El Manouar, “An AHP Model towards an Agile Enterprise,” vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 151–156, 2017.[9] M. Velasquez and P. T. Hester, “An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods,” vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 56–66, 2013.[10] A. Alshaibi, G. D. Kahraman, and A. Qasim, “Analytic Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) as criteria in business decision making and their implementation in practice,” vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 209–220, 2016.[11] J. M. Hummel, J. F. P. Bridges, and M. J. Ijzerman, “Group Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Benefit-Risk Assessment: A Tutorial,” 2014.[12] S. Guide, P. Proposals, T. Be, I. Symposium, and A. H. Process, “AHP Method of Determination of Relative Weights For Judged Items and Judges in a Judgement Process 2,” in ISAHP Article: A Style Guide for Paper Proposals To Be Submitted to the International Symposium of the Analytic Hierarchy Process 2016, London, U.K., 2016, pp. 1–2.[13] W. Ossadnik, S. Schinke, and R. H. Kaspar, “Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process : A Comparative Analysis,” Gr. Decis. Negot., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 421–457, 2016.[14] G. P. Bhole and T. Deshmukh, “Multi Criteria Decision Making ( MCDM ) Methods,” nternational J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 6, no. V, pp. 899–915, 2018.[15] D. P. and D. B. Darko Božanić, “Modification of The Analytic Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) Method Using Fuzzy Logic : Fuzzy AHP Approach as a Support to The Decison Making Process Concerning,” Serbian J. Manag., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 151–171, 2015.[16] L. Z. S. Petra Grošelj, “Soft consensus model for the group fuzzy AHP decision making,” Croat. Oper. Res. Rev., vol. 8, pp. 207–220, 2017.[17] B. Zhu and Z. Xu, “Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 239, pp. 794–796, 2014.[18] J. and K. K. Franek, “A Review And Critique of Hybrid MADM Methods,” in International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 2014, pp. 1–5.[19] N. F. Aziz, S. Sorooshian, and F. Mahmud, “MCDM-AHP method in decision makings,” ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 7217–7220, 2016.[20] M. B. Barfod, “Graphical and technical options in Expert Choice for group decision making,” p. 35, 2014.[21] A. Ishizaka and A. Labib, “Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and limitations,” OR Insight, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 201–220, 2009.[22] G. Kou, X. Chao, Y. Peng, L. Xu, and Y. Chen, “Intelligent Collaborative Support System for AHP-Group Decision Making,” vol. 26, no. June, pp. 131–142, 2017.[23] T. L. Saaty, “Better world through better decision making,” Proc. Int. Symp. Anal. Hierarchy Process 2013, pp. 1–9, 2013.[24] T. Saaty and L. Vargas, “Models,Mmethods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Int. Ser. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 175 Springer Sci. Media New York, 2012.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Please find the rights and licenses in the Fountain of Informatics Journal (FIJ). By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author, and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
FIJ's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, FIJ permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and FIJ on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
- The right to self-archive the article (please read out deposit policy),
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. FIJ will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. FIJ will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that FIJ entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
FIJ will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. FIJ's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
