Item Analysis of Islamic Education For Class VIII at Junior High School 1 Jetis Ponorogo

Authors

  • Ihwan Mahmudi Universitas Darussalam Gontor
  • Raden Rizky Fahrial Ahmad Universitas Darussalam Gontor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/educan.v4i1.4565

Keywords:

Validity, Reliability, Difficulty Level, Different Power

Abstract

Education is a conscious activity that is intentional and planned to achieve a goal, then to achieve these objectives it is necessary to evaluate. The success of the evaluation activity can be seen from the making of questions, the implementation of the test and how the teacher can process the results of the test. The study’s aims to determine the quality of the items of the Midterm Exam for Islamic Religious Education 7th grade at Junior High School 1 Jetis Ponorogo 2019/2020 Academic Year in terms of validity, reliability, difficulty level, and different power. This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The object of this study is the Midterm Exam Subjects for Islamic Religious Education 7th grade at Junior High School 1 Jetis Ponorogo Academic Year 2019/2020 consisting of 20 multiple choice exam questions and 5 test items for essay/essay. The data collection technique this time uses the documentation method in the form of midterm examination scores. The results showed that: (1) the validity test, for multiple choice questions totaling 20 items in total was declared valid, as well as for the problem description / essay which totaled 5 items in total were declared valid. (2) the reliability test, in the form of multiple choice questions have a low reliability index of 0.654, as well as for the form of description / essay questions have a low reliability index of 0.529. (3) difficult level test, the form of multiple choice questions categorized as hard is 1 item (5%), 13 items (65%), easy 6 items (30%) and for the form of questions / essay questions are not available, while 3 items are (60%), easily 2 items (40%). (4) different power test problems, the form of multiple choice questions categorized as bad 6 items (30%), enough 13 items (65%), good 1 item (5%), very good none and for the form of question items / essays categorized as bad 1 item (20%), enough 2 items (40%), good 2 items (20%) absolutely nothing. (5) the quality of items in multiple choice questions including good quality is 14 items (70%), the quality is quite good 2 items (10%), and the quality is not good 4 items (20%) and for the description / essay questions included good quality is 3 items (60%), good quality is 1 item (20%), and quality is not good 1 item (20%). Based on the findings, then to improve the quality of the midterm examination even in the Islamic Religious Education subjects of 7th grade at Junior High School 1 Jetis Ponorogo, teachers should pay more attention to the item indicators both in terms of validity, reliability, difficulty level and different power of items to be tested.

References

Anwar, Saepul & Fakhruddin, Agus. Pelaksanaan Standar Penilaian oleh Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah (Studi Evaluatif terhadap Guru PAI SMP dan SMA di Bandung). Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam – Ta’lim. Vol. 14. No. 2. 2016. p. 139-155. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Pertiwia, Citra Media. Muliyatib, Dewi. Serevina, Vina. Rancangan Tes dan Evaluasi Fisika yang Informatif dan Komunikatif pada Materi Kinematika Gerak Lurus. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika. Vol. 2. No. 1. Juni 2016. p. 81-88. Asrul, Rusydi Ananda, Rosnita. 2015. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Cita Pustaka Media. Maharani, Anggita. Analisis Pengembangan Soal Tes Evaluasi Matematika Berbasis Kemampuan Berfikir Kreatif untuk Siswa SMK pada Materi Geometri. Aksioma Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Univ. Muhammadiyah. Vol. 6. No. 3. 2017. p. 350-363. Purwanto, M. Ngalim. 2017. Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Purwanto. 2016. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Sudjana, Nana. 2014. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Sudjiono, Anas. 2015. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. Suparnanto, Kusaeri. 2012. Pengukuran dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu. Suryani, Yulinda Erma. Pemetaan Kualitas Empirik Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia SMA di Kabupaten Klaten. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Vol. 2. No. 2. Desember 2017. p. 142-152. Taufiq, Ainul Uyuni. Pengembangan Tes Kognitif Berbasis Revisi Taksonomi Bloom pada Materi Sistem Reproduksi Untuk Siswa SMA. Jurnal Biotek. Vol. 3. No. 2. Desember 2015. p. 1-17. Widoyoko, Eko Putro. 2018. Penilaian Hasil Belajar di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-28

How to Cite

Mahmudi, I., & Ahmad, R. R. F. (2020). Item Analysis of Islamic Education For Class VIII at Junior High School 1 Jetis Ponorogo. EDUCAN : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN ISLAM, 4(1), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.21111/educan.v4i1.4565

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

1. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER OPEN ACCESS

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

2. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER DELAYED OPEN ACCESS


Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).