Realitas Pembelajaran Tatap Muka 100% Dalam Konstruksi Berita Media

Authors

  • Christopher Chandra Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya
  • Putra Aditya Lapalelo Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/ejoc.v7i2.8305

Keywords:

Pembelajaran Tatap Muka, Framing, Berita Media Sosial, Instagram

Abstract

AbstrakPemerintah mengeluarkan regulasi Pembelajaran Tatap Muka 100% (PTM 100%) ditengah kemunculan kasus varian baru Covid 19, kontroversi ini membuat masyarakat dan media berdialektika. Penelitian ini berfokus pada bagaimana media menggunakan perangkat media sosial untuk membangun bingkai tentang dialektika regulasi PTM 100%. Disisi lain menjawab pertanyaan bagaimana proses bingkai dilakukan dalam media Instagram. Dengan keungulan dan keterbatasan media sosial, ada dugaan bahwa  jurnalistik professional media konvensional harus membangun tata kelola pembingkaian dan seleksi isu yang mungkin berbeda dengan cara kerja media konvensional, ketika menerbitkan konten berita di instagram. Menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif, dengan model framing Gamson dan Modigliani (1989), penelitian ini melihat 5 akun berita yang dikelola oleh koorporasi media, yakni Detik, Merdekadotcom, JPNN, Kompas, dan Tempo. Hasilnya ditemukan bahwa beberapa media punya kecenderungan tidak memihak dalam kasus PTM 100%, beberapa media mencoba menjadi “suara rakyat”  dan “mengkritisi” pemerintah dalam kasus PTM 100%. Media mencoba menjaga peranannya sebagai agen kontrol sosial di kasus PTM 100%, disisi lain memastikan bahwa identitas dan bisnis media tetap berjalan dengan memanfaatkan Instagram untuk membangun relasi dengan generasi baru pembaca berita. Penelitian ini membantu menjelaskan bagaimana teori klasik pembingkaian berita, dimanfaatkan dalam konten berita yang lebih modern, dan bagaimana proses pembingkaian berubah dari yang sangat tekstual, menjadi sangat visual.  AbstractThe government issued a 100% face-to-face learning regulation (100% Onsite Learning) in the midst of the emergence of new variant cases of Covid 19. This controversy made the public and the media have a dialectic. How is  100% Onsite Learning viewed by the media?. This study focuses on how the media use social media tools to build a frame about the dialectic of 100% Onsite Learning regulation. On the other hand, it answers the question of how the frame process is carried in Instagram media. With the advantages and limitations of social media, there is an assumption that conventional media professional journalism must develop governance of framing and selection of issues that may be different from the way conventional media works, when publishing news content on Instagram. Using a qualitative descriptive method, with Gamson and Modigliani's (1989) framing model, this study looked at 5 news accounts managed by media corporations, namely Detik, Merdekadotcom, JPNN, Kompas, and Tempo.The results found that some media had a tendency to be impartial in the 100% Onsite Learning case, some media tried to be the “voice of the people” and “criticize” the government in the 100% Onsite Learning case. The media tries to maintain its role as a social control agent in the 100% Onsite Learning case, on the other hand ensuring that the identity and media business continues to run by utilizing Instagram to build relationships with a new generation of news readers. This research helps us to explain the classical theory news framing are utilized to analyize a modern news content and how framing process changes from textual to visual.

References

Adornato, A. (2017). Mobile and Social Media Journalism - A Practical Guide. London: SAGE Publications.Ali, Hasanuddin, Lilik, P., Nugroho, H., Halim, T., Firdaus, K., & Huda, N. (2020). Indonesia Gen Z And Millenial Report 2020: The Battle Of Our Generation. PT Alvara Strategi Indonesia, 134. Retrieved from http://alvara-strategic.com/indonesia-gen-z-and-millenial-report-2020/Ali, Hasanudin, Purwandi, L., Nugroho, H., Ekoputri, A. W., & Halim, T. (2017). The Urban Middle-Class Indonesia: Financial and Online Behavior. Alvara Research Center.Angendari, D. A. D. (2021). Menelaah Pesan Pemerintah Terkait Krisis Covid-19 di Media Sosial. Jurnal Riset Komunikasi, 4(2), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.38194/jurkom.v4i2.327Aristi, N., Janitra, P. A., & Prihandini, P. (2021). Fokus narasi kekerasan seksual pada portal berita daring selama pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 9(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v9i1.30673Carlson, M. (2018). Facebook in the News: Social media, journalism, and public responsibility following the 2016 Trending Topics controversy. Digital Journalism, 6(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1298044Carpenter, S. (2010). A study of content diversity in online citizen journalism and online newspaper articles. New Media and Society, 12(7), 1064–1084. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809348772Chandra Sari, R. N., Kriyantono, R., & Prianti, D. D. (2021). Bingkai Media di Masa Pra Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia (Studi Framing Pemberitaan Covid-19 di Portal Berita dan Akun Youtube Tribunnews Edisi Maret 2020). Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Dan Media, 25(2), 251. https://doi.org/10.31445/jskm.2021.3836Eriyanto. (2002). Analisis framing: konstruksi, ideologi, dan politik media. LKiS. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=wGwj0CPSjlQCGamson, W. A. (1989). News as Framing. American Behavioral Scientist, 33(2), 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764289033002006Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213Hallin, D. C. (1986). The “Uncensored War” The Media and Vietnam. OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS.Hallin, D. C. (2005). We Keep America on Top of the World. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203977477Heravi, B. R., & Harrower, N. (2016). Twitter journalism in Ireland: sourcing and trust in the age of social media*. Information Communication and Society, 19(9), 1194–1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1187649Indainanto, Y. I. (2020). Normalisasi Kekerasan Seksual Wanita di Media Online. Jurnal Komunikasi, 14(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.21107/ilkom.v14i2.6806Iqbal, M., & Sari, F. S. (2022). Dampak Pembelajaran Daring di Era Pandemi Covid-19 Pada. 2(1), 101–110.Jensen, K. B. (2020). A Handbook of Media and Communication Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies; 3rd edition. In Taylor & Francis Group.Jerónimo, P., Correia, J. C., & Gradim, A. (2022). Are We Close Enough? Digital Challenges to Local Journalists. Journalism Practice, 16(5), 813–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1818607Kleemans, M., Schaap, G., & Suijkerbuijk, M. (2018). Getting Youngsters Hooked on News: The effects of narrative news on information processing and appreciation in different age groups. Journalism Studies, 19(14), 2108–2125. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1324316Kulkarni, S., Thomas, R., Komorowski, M., & Lewis, J. (2022). Innovating Online Journalism: New Ways of Storytelling. Journalism Practice, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.2020675Larsson, A. O. (2017). The News User on Social Media THE NEWS USER ON SOCIAL MEDIA A comparative study of interacting with media organizations on Facebook and Instagram. Journalism Studies, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1332957Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2016). How Long Do News Framing Effects Last? A Systematic review of Longitudinal Studies. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735254Lecheler, S., Keer, M., Schuck, A. R. T., & Hänggli, R. (2015). The Effects of Repetitive News Framing on Political Opinions over Time. Communication Monographs, 82(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.994646Lestari, R. D. (2018). PACK JOURNALISM DAN HOMOGENITAS INFORMASI PUBLIK (Studi Kasus Pada Jurnalis Yogyakarta dalam Memproduksi Pemberitaan di Media). Ettisal Journal of Communication, 3(2), 183–189.Massie, A. Y., & Nababan, K. R. (2021). Dampak Pembelajaran Daring Terhadap Pendidikan Karakter Siswa. Satya Widya, 37(1), 57. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uksw.edu/satyawidya/article/view/4988Mellado, C., Hallin, D., Cárcamo, L., Alfaro, R., Jackson, D., Humanes, M. L., … Ramos, A. (2021). Sourcing Pandemic News: A Cross-National Computational Analysis of Mainstream Media Coverage of COVID-19 on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Digital Journalism, 9(9), 1271–1295. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1942114Michelle, A., & Susilo, D. (2021). The Effect of Instagram Social Media Exposure on Purchase Decision. ETTISAL : Journal of Communication, 6(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.21111/ejoc.v6i1.6242Nossek, H., & Berkowitz, D. (2006). Telling “Our” story through news of terrorism: Mythical newswork as journalistic practice in crisis. Journalism Studies, 7(5), 691–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700600890356Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963Poulin, R. (2018). Design School Layout : A Practical Guide for Students and Designers. Beverly: Rockport Publisher.Rastati, R. (2018). Media Literasi Bagi Digital Natives: Perspektif Generasi Z Di Jakarta. Jurnal Kwangsan : Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.31800/jurnalkwangsan.v6i1.72Realita, E., & Setiadi, U. (2022). Konsumsi Berita Insidental di Media Sosial pada Generasi Dewasa. Jurnal Riset Komunikasi, 5(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.38194/jurkom.v5i1.437Rustandi, R. (2020). Analisis Framing Kontra Narasi Terorisme dan Radikalisme di Media Sosial (Studi Kasus pada Akun @dutadamaijabar). Jurnal Komunikatif, 9(2), 134–153. https://doi.org/10.33508/jk.v9i2.2698Salaudeen, M. A. (2021). From Personal to Professional: Exploring the Influences on Journalists’ Evaluation of Citizen Journalism Credibility. Journalism Practice, 0(0), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1892517Samara, T. (2017). Graphic designer’s Essential Reference. Beverly, Mass: Rockport Publisher.Santi, S. (2012). Frame Analysis : Konstruksi Fakta Dalam Bingkai Berita. Forum Ilmiah, 9(1), 219–232.Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (2013). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930434Supardi, A. (2017). Reklamasi di Teluk Jakarta adalah program lama yang sudah Pemerintah Indonesia mengeluar-. Komunikatif, 5, 35–60.Swart, J., Groot Kormelink, T., Costera Meijer, I., & Broersma, M. (2022). Advancing a Radical Audience Turn in Journalism. Fundamental Dilemmas for Journalism Studies. Digital Journalism, 10(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.2024764Syafikarani, A., Tohir, M., & Prajana, A. M. (2022). Strategi Komunikasi Visual Pada Iklan Animasi Khong Guan “ Sebuah Kenangan. 0(0), 1–16.Triandika, L. S. (2020). Bias Berita Pemilihan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden di Media Massa Lokal Madura. Komunikatif, 9(1), 93–113.Vliegenthart, R., & Boukes, M. (2018). On the Street and/or on Twitter?: The use of “every day” sources in economic news coverage by online and offline outlets. Digital Journalism, 6(7), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1497449Vos, T. P., Eichholz, M., & Karaliova, T. (2019). Audiences and Journalistic Capital: Roles of journalism. Journalism Studies, 20(7), 1009–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1477551Vos, T. P., & Russell, F. M. (2019). Theorizing Journalism’s Institutional Relationships: An Elaboration of Gatekeeping Theory. Journalism Studies, 20(16), 2331–2348. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1593882Yousuf, M., & Taylor, M. (2017). Helping Syrians Tell Their Story to The World: Training Syrian citizen journalists through connective journalism. Journalism Practice, 11(2–3), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1218296

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): ETTISAL : Journal of Communication

Section

Articles

License

In order to be accepted and published by Ettisal : Journal of Communication, author(s) submitting the article manuscript should complete all the review stages. By submitting the manuscript the author(s) agreed to these following terms:

1.   The copyright of received articles shall be assigned to [Ettisal : Journal of Communication] as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish articles in various forms (including reprints). [Ettisal : Journal of Communication] maintain the publishing rights to the published articles.

2.   Authors are permitted to disseminate published article by sharing the link/DOI of the article at [Ettisal : Journal of Communication]. authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from [Ettisal : Journal of Communication] with an acknowledgement of initial publication to this journal.

3.   Users/public use of this website will be licensed to CC BY-NC-SA (Attribution & Non-Commercial-ShareAlike)