Analysis of the Health Level of Sharia Banks Using the RGEC Method in 2019-2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21111/jiep.v8i1.13712Keywords:
Sharia Banking, RGEC Method, Bank HealthAbstract
Indonesia embraces a dual banking framework where both conventional and Sharia banks operate simultaneously. This coexistence allows a diverse range of financial services to cater to various customer needs. Despite this, Sharia banking accounts for only 7.3% of the nation's total banking sector. This limited market share is indicative of challenges such as lower public awareness and less competitive financial products compared to conventional banks. Therefore, assessing the health of Sharia banks is essential for ensuring their sustainability, enhancing financial stability, and building public trust in their operations.This research examines the health of Sharia banks from 2019 to 2023, using the RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning, and Capital) method. A quantitative approach with descriptive analysis reveals that, on average, Sharia banks demonstrated varying degrees of health, with some excelling while others struggled to meet standards set by regulatory bodies. The result of this study is that in 2019 the health of Sharia commercial banks was ranked "quite healthy" which then improved in 2020 by getting a "healthy" rating, in the last 3 years the health of Sharia commercial banks has declined again with a rating of "quite healthy". The findings of this researc highlight specific areas for improvement and strategic growth within the sector.References
Dayyesi, H. (2023). Analisis Penilaian Kesehatan Bank dengan Mengguanakn Metode RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning, Capital) pada Bank Umum Syariah Tahun 2017-2021. Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah.
Ginting, R. (2012). Kodifikasi Peraturan Bank Indonesia Kelembagaan Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank. Jakarta: Pusat Riset dan Edukasi Bank Sentral.
Habsyah, R. G. (2023). How Does Bank Syariah Indonesia's Financial Performance Reflect Its Health Level? An RGEC Approach. Jurnal Kajian Keuangan, 45-60.
Ismai, A. F., Chik, W. M., & Ali, A. W. (2022). The Objective of Shariah Governance: A Maqasid Perspective. Al-Qanatir: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 113-120.
Istiqoma, L. (2023). Pengaruh Aspek Rentabilitas dan Likuiditas Terhadap Kesehatan Bank Umum Syariah Tahun 2017-2021. Jurnal Publikasi Manajemen Informatika, 130-140.
Jallow, M. S. (2023). The Impact of Macroeconomics Variables and Bank Internal Factors on Islamic Banking Performance During Covid-19 in Indonesia. JIEP: Journal of Islamic Economics and Philanthropy, 20-37.
Khiswaradewi, D. (2023). Assesment of Bank Health Level Using RGEC Methode and Its Impact on Islamic Financial Distress. Jurnal Internasional Kesehatan Sosial, 362-368.
Khunaifi, F. A., & Umam, K. (2019). Determinant Profitability Of Sharia Bank Based On Macroeconomic Variables. Journal of Islamic Economics and Philanthropy (JIEP), 251-283.
Kusumaningrum, T. A., & Maika, M. R. (2024). Pengaruh Bopo Dan Fdr Terhadap Profitabilitas Return On Asset (Roa) Bank Bukopin Syariah. Jurnal Tabarru’ : Islamic Banking and Finance, 451-462.
Laras, A. (2023, Desember 1). Finansial. Retrieved Desember 1, 2023, from Finansial Web site: https://finansial.bisnis.com/read
NIAGA, C. (2020). CIMB NIAGA. Retrieved Desember 1, 2023, from CIMB NIAGA: https://www.cimbniaga.co.id
Nurafini, F. (2022). Studi Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Antara Bank Syariah dan Bank Konvensional di Indonesia Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 2690-2695.
Pacelli, V. (2024). Systemic Risk and Complex Networks in Modern Financial Systems. italy: springer.
Priadana, S. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Tangerang: Pascal Books.
Purnamasari, D. S., Fani, A. A., & Safitri, F. I. (2023). Do we need a Sharia Supervisory Board in every Islamic bank? JIEP: Journal of Islamic Economics and Philanthropy, 131-144.
Rian Dani, I. W. (2022). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan Menggunakan Metode Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) pada PT. Bank Mega Syariah Periode Tahun 2017-2021. Jurnal Manajemen, 363-367.
Riftiasari, D. (2023). Analisis Rasio Keuangan dalam Menilai Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Badan Usaha Mulik Negara (BUMN) pada Saat Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis, 391-395.
Rohmah, R. R. (2024). Evolusi Hukum Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia. Al Midad : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Studi Keislaman, 49-62.
Rudiantono, S. N. (2022). Analisis Kesehatan Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia. Internasional Journal of Education and Social Science, 71.
Rumasukun, M. A., & Reza, M. I. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Car, Bopo, Npf, Dan Fdr Terhadap Profitabilitas Bank Syariah Dan Bank Konvensional Di Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics and Philanthropy (JIEP), 103-124.
Rusby, Z. (2017). Manajemen Perbank Syariah. Riau: Pusat Kajian Pendidikan Islam FAI UIR.
Safitri, E. (2021). Perbedaan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum Konvensional dan Bank Umum Syariah yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). JABA: Journal of Applied Business Administration, 46-52.
Saifudin. (2023). Technology in the Study of Production of Islamic Financial Institution Services at Bank Muamala. indikator: jurnal ilmiah manajemen dan bisnis, 113-119.
Sari, Y. M. (2019). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum Syariah Sebelum dan Sesudah Terdaftar di BEI. I-Finance, 70-75.
Sjarief, L., Ghoni, M. A., & & Affandi, M. T. (2023). The Role of Financial Performance on the Profitability of Indonesian Islamic Banks. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam, 210-225.
Sodik, F. (2023). Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Syariah Menggunakan Metode RGEC. Jurnal AKUNIDA, 47-52.
Taqy, F., & Purnama, R. (2025). The Influence of Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) and Non Performing Loan (NPL) on Return on Assets (ROA) of Islamic Banking in Indonesia for the Period 2009-2023. International Journal of Current Economics & Business Ventures, 71-83.
Umum, P. B. (2011). Patent No. 13/ 1 /PBI/2011, Pasal 1. Indonesia.
