الأفكار المشبوهة حول دراسة النسخ في علوم القرآن: التعليقات والتعقيبات

Authors

  • Husni Mubarrak Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Ar-Raniry, Aceh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v12i2.764

Keywords:

Naskh, ‘Ulûm al-Qur’ân, Orientalism, Critical Studies, Suspicious Ideas

Abstract

This article discusses naskh in the studies of the Qur’an (‘Ulûm al-Qur’ân). The research focus begins on different understandings and interpretations on stoning punishment for adulterers who had married, based on the story of a Prophet’s companion, Umar ibn Khattab, who said that it was a part of the Qur’an until it then removed from the Qur’an, even though the law is still in force. This story is often used as an example of a naskh criteria that the script had been removed from the Qur’an, even though the law remains in force which were frequently targeted as a form of negligence and mistakes that (probably) there are parts of the Qur’an forgotten, missed or even disappeared when the collecting and codifying the Qur’an in the Ṣaḥâbah (Companions) period since the era of Abu Bakar up to Utsman ibn ‘Affan. These diverse understandings and various thinking related to naskh in al-Qur’an are awkward things which are strongly influenced by orientalism mind and thinking that then come to the surface until, in turn, led to doubt on the validity of the Qur’an that exist today until arousing some efforts to reconstruct and reorder the Qur’an based on corresponding period. This article is quietly concerned to criticize and straighten naskh understanding of the Qur’an with reference to the main reference (mother books) in the tradition of ‘Ulûm al-Qur’ân (Turâts) which are valid and can be justified scientifically.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abu Zayd, Nasr Hamid. 1990. Mafhûm al-Naṣ: Dirâsah fî ‘Ulûm al-Qurân. Al-Baidha: al-Markaz al-Tsaqâfî al-‘Arabiy.

Al-Ashfahani, al-Raghib. 2009. Mufradât Alfâẓ al-Qurân. Damascus: Dâr al-Qalam.

Al-Baqilani, Abu Bakar. 2001. Al-Intiṣâr li al-Qurân. Amman: Dâr al-Fatḥ li al-Nasyr wa al-Tawzî’.

Bau’ud, Ahmad.2015. ‘Ulûm al-Qurân fî al-Manzûr al-Ḥadâtsî – Dirâsah Taḥlîlîyah Naqdiyyah li Ârâ al-Ḥadâtsiyîn fî al-Qurân al-Karîm. Cairo: Dâr al-Kalimah li al-Nasyr wa al-Tauzî’, Cet. 1.

Al-Duwalaibi, Muhammad Ma’ruf. 1995. Al-Madkhal ilâ ‘Ilm Uṣûl al-Fiqh. Cairo: Dâr al-Syawâf li al-Nasyr wa al-Tauzî’.

Al-Ghazali, Muhammad. 1996. Naẓarât fî al-Qur’ân. Cairo: Dâr Nahḍah Miṣr.

_________. 2011.Kaif Nata’âmal ma’a al-Qurân?. Cairo: Dâr Nahḍah Miṣr.

Al-Harawi, Abu Ubayd al-Qasim bin Salam. T.Th. al-Nâsikh wa al-Mansûkh fî al-Qurân al-‘Azîz wamâ fîh min al-Farâiḍ wa al-Sunan. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Rusyd.

Ibnu ‘Asyur, Muhammad Thahir. 1984. Tafsîr al-Taḥrîr wa Tanwîr. Tunis: al-Dâr al-Tûnisiyah li al-Nasyr.

Al-Jabiri, Muhammad Abid. 2008. Fahm al-Qurân al-Ḥakîm ḥasb Tartîb al-Nuzûl. Al-Maghrib: Dâr al-Nasyr al-Maghrîbiyah.

Al-Janabi, Amjad Yunus. 2015. Âtsâr al-Isytisyrâq al-Almânî fî al-Dirâsât al-Qur’âniyyah – Dirâsah Naqdiyyah. Riyadh: Markaz al-Tafsîr li al-Dirâsât al-Qur’âniyyah.

Al-Khafif, Ali. 1956. Muḥâḍarât fî Asbâb Ikhtilâf al-Fuqahâ’. Cairo: Ma’had al-Dirâsât al-‘Arabiyyah al-‘Âlamiyyah.

Al-Khudri, Muhammad. T.Th. Uṣûl al-Fiqh. Cairo: Maṭba’ah al-Istiqâmah.

Al-Shalih, Subhi. 1977. Mabâḥits fî ‘Ulûm al-Qur’ân. Beirut: Dâr al-‘Ilm li al-Malâyîn.

Al-Suyuthi, Jalaluddin. T.Th. al-Itqân fî ‘Ulûm al-Qur’ân. Cairo: Maṭba’ah Ḥijâzî.

Al-Syafi’i, Muhammad bin Idris. 1938. Al-Risâlah. Cairo: Maṭba’ah Muṣṭafâ al-Bâbî al-Ḥalabi.

Al-Wahidi, Abu al-Hasan. 1991. Asbâb Nuzûl al-Qurân. Beirut: Dâr al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Zuhayli, Wahah. 1996. Uṣûl al-Fiqh al-Islâmiy. Damascus: Dâr al-Fikr.

Downloads

Submitted

2017-01-18

Published

2016-11-30