The Reconstruction of Aligarh and Santiniketan Educational Philosophy: The Creative Ijtihad of Trimurti in Developing Islamic Education in Indonesia

Authors

  • Kurniawan Dwi Saputra Universitas Islam Indonesia
  • Krismono Krismono Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v17i2.6879

Keywords:

Reconstruction, Philosophy of Education, Gontor, Aligarh, Santiniketan.

Abstract

The development of modern Islamic boarding schools‎ in Indonesia cannot be separated from the model built by the Gontor Islamic Boarding School. Gontor's education system is constructed to accommodate the continuity of Islamic religious traditions by adapting educational principles developed by exemplary institutions called sintesa. There are four specific inspirations of Gontor education: Al-Azhar in Egypt, Syanggit in Mauritania, Aligarh, and Santiniketan in India. This study aims to discuss Gontor education which is constructed from the educational philosophy of Aligarh and Santiniketan. The method used is autoethnography with the use of Giddens structuration as a theoretical framework. This study found that, in general, the influence of Aligarh and Santiniketan embodied in two aspects: symbolic and substantial. The symbolic aspect presents in the form of the nominalization of physical and non-physical infrastructure in Gontor. Substantial aspects are manifested in the modernization of the learning system and institutional governance, language skills, and the design of a holistic educational paradigm. This influence is manifested in Gontor education through a dialectical-structural step that involves the creative process of Trimurti, the founder of Gontor, to reconstruct the Aligarh and Santiniketan educational philosophies that are useful in developing and in line with Islamic education traditions. Keywords: Reconstruction, Islamic Education, Gontor, Aligarh, Santiniketan.   

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arifianto, Andi Rahmat. “Disiplin Yang Produktif (Studi Etnografi Disiplin Di Pesantren Gontor).” Master Thesis, Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Social Sciences and Politics, Universitas Indonesia, 2009. Aronson, Alex. “Tagore’s Educational Ideals.” Education 7, no. 4 (1961): 385–93. Asmoni, and Iwan Kuswandi. “Ustadz Madrasah Diniyah Di Masa Pandemi Covid 19 Dalam Perspektif Teori Strukturasi Anthony Giddens,” no. September (2020): 74–79. Bus, Yecki. “SIR SAYYID AHMAD KHAN DAN REKONSTRUKSISME PENDIDIKAN ISLAM ALA INDIA.” Turast : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian 3, no. 1 (2015): 57–71. https://ejournal.uinib.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/turast/article/view/375. Castle, Lance. “Notes on the Islamic Education at Gontor,” 1965. Chowdhury, Indira. “Santiniketan: The Making of a New Indian Pilgrimage.” Source: The Public Historian 35, no. 2 (2013): 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2013.35.2.99. Giddens, Anthony. The Constitution of Society: Teori Strukturasi Untuk Analisis Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pedati, 2011. ———. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Polity Press, 1984. Gupta, Uma Das. “In Pursuit of a Different Freedom: Tagore’s World University at Santiniketan.” India International Center Quarterly 29, no. 4 (2003): 25–38. Hassan, Rahmani Begum Mohammad Ruknuddin. “The Educational Movement of Sir Syed Ahmad Khan 1858-1898,” 1959. Herman, Herman. “SEJARAH PESANTREN DI INDONESIA.” Al-TA’DIB: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan 6, no. 2 (July 1, 2013): 145–58. https://doi.org/10.31332/ATDB.V6I2.311. Huxley, Aldous. “Reflections on Tagore.” Indian Literature 4, no. 1 (1960): 129–32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23329365. Jaleel, Shahid. “The Aligarh Movement: A Chapter in The History of Indian Education,” 2004. Kementrian Agama Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Agama Republik Indonesia No. 13 Tahun 2014 tentang Pendidikan Keagamaan Islam (2014). Lal, Swati. “Special Issue: Defining Cultural and Educational Relations-An International Perspective (Summer, 1984).” Source: The Journal of Aesthetic Education , Summer 18, no. 2 (1984): 31–39. Misbach, Muhammad Ghufron, Amir Hamzah Wiryosukarto, Ahmad Fuad Effendi, Nashrulloh Zainal Muttaqien, and Makasi. Zarkasyi Dari Gontor Merintis Pesantren Modern. 1st ed. Ponorogo: Trimurti Press, 1996. Nations, United. Universal Declaration of Human Right. United Nations, 2015. https://www.un.org/en/udhrbook/pdf/udhr_booklet_en_web.pdf. Nirzalin. “Mendamaikan Aktor Dan Struktur Dalam Analisis Sosial Perspektif Teori Strukturasi Antony Giddens.” Jurnal Sosiologi USK (Media Pemikiran & Aplikasi) 3, no. 1 (2013): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.24815/jsu. O’connell, Kathleen M. “Education at Santiniketan: 1902-1920.” Quarterly 38, no. 1 (2011): 18–31. Salamatullah. “Tagore as Educationist” 4, no. 1 (1960): 133–39. https://about.jstor.org/terms. “Sintesa.” Accessed October 10, 2021. https://www.gontor.ac.id/sintesa. Tagore, Rabindranath. “Tagore on Education.” Indian Literature 4, no. 1/2 (September 1961): 140–42. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23329367. Zarkasyi, Ahmad Hidayatullah. Personal Interview. 18 September 2021. Zarkasyi, Hamid Fahmy. “Imam Zarkasyi’s Modernization of Pesantren in Indonesia (A Case Study of Darussalam Gontor).” QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies) 8, no. 1 (June 30, 2020): 161–200. https://journal.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/QIJIS/article/view/5760. ———. “Modern Pondok Pesantren: Maintaining Tradition in Modern System.” TSAQAFAH 11, no. 2 (November 30, 2015): 223–48. https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/tsaqafah/article/view/267. Zizek, Slavoj. The Sublime Object of Ideology. 13th ed. London: Verso, 2008.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-11-15

Accepted

2021-12-18

Published

2021-12-18