Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas on Human Origin

Authors

  • Fiqih Risallah RZS-CASIS Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Tatiana Denisova Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v15i2.3382

Keywords:

al-Attas, Human Being, Human Origin, Missing Link, Prophet Adam

Abstract

AbstractThis paper aims to reflect on al-Attas’ conception of human creation. It argues that human creation model in Islamic perspective differs from evolutionary and positivist model. The issue centers upon a question as to when Adam was initially present on earth. Al-Attas asserts that human knowledge of his origin is limited in such a way that only through revelation it is truly revealed. Divine information is crucial without which knowledge of his origin would be a matter of purely speculative presumption. By employing a tawḥîd approach, al-Attas managed to establish the time frame of Adam first appearance with a view to clarifying that his arrival along with his wife was in approximately between 7000 and 8000 years ago, not in terms of hundreds of thousands of years ago. This estimative calculation can only be done when the definition of human being is clearly justified. Al-Ḥayawân al-Nâṭiq is more than a mere rational animal, conceived as having a connection with prior organism. Al-Attas defines it a living being that speaks signifying his given power to apprehend what knowledge communicates and to communicate what it apprehends. This paper found that human being is a special and a new creation, and Adam is the Father of mankind nothing to do with biological evolutionary theory. This creation is a recent event in the history of time. Hence, human was created with purpose justifying that his existence on earth is a grace and his life historically is purposeful.Keywords: al-Attas, Human Being, Human Origin, Missing Link, Prophet Adam.   AbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk merefleksikan konsepsi al-Attas tentang penciptaan manusia. Menyatakan bahwa model penciptaan manusia dari perspektif Islam bertentangan dengan model dari kelompok evolusionis dan positivis. Permasalahan utamanya berkaitan dengan pertanyaan kapan Adam hadir di bumi pertama kali. Al-Attas menegaskan bahwa pengetahuan manusia tentang asal-usulnya sangat terbatas sehingga hanya melalui perantaraan wahyu hal itu bisa terungkap. Informasi ilahi sangat krusial yang dengan tanpanya, pengetahuan manusia terhadap asal-usulnya akan menjadi anggapan yang bersifat spekulatif. Dengan menerapkan pendekatan tawḥîd, al-Attas berhasil menetapkan jangkaan waktu keberadaan Adam pertama kali di bumi yang bertujuan untuk mengklarifikasi bahwa kedatangannya bersama istrinya adalah berkisar antara 7000 sampai 8000 tahun yang lalu; bukan ratusan ribu tahun yang lalu. Kalkulasi ini hanya dapat dilakukan jika definisi tentang manusia telah diformulasikan dengan benar dan tepat. Al-Ḥayawân al-Nâṭiq tidak hanya sekedar bermaksud ‘hewan rasional’ yang dianggap memiliki keterkaitan dengan organisme sebelumnya. Al-Attas mendefinisikannya sebagai makhluk hidup yang bertutur-kata yang menunjukkan akan kekuatan yang dimilikinya untuk mampu memahami apa yang dikomunikasikan sebagai pengetahuan dan mampu mengkomunikasikan apa yang ditangkapnya. Artikel ini menemukan bahwa  asal-usul manusia adalah sebagai ciptaan khusus dan baru, dan Adam merupakan bapak umat manusia yang tidak ada hubungannya dengan teori evolusi biologis. Penciptaannya termasuk dalam kategori peristiwa baru dalam sejarah waktu. Karenanya, manusia diciptakan dengan tujuan yang bermaksud bahwa keberadaanmya di muka bumi adalah sebuah rahmat dan secara historis kehidupannya memiliki tujuan. Kata Kunci: al-Attas, Manusia, Asal-Usul Manusia, Missing Link, Nabi Adam.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. Preliminary Statement on a General Theory of the Islamization of the Malay-Indonesian Archipelago, (Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, 1969).____________, The Positive Aspects of Tasawwuf: Preliminary Thoughts on An Islamic Philosophy of Science, (Kuala Lumpur: ASASI, 1981).____________, The Nature of Man and the Psychology of the Human Soul, (Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 1990).____________, Islam and Secularism, (Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 1993).____________, “The Worldview of Islam,” in (Ed.) Sharifah Shifa al-Attas, Islam and the Challenge of Modernity, (Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 1996).____________, The Religion of Islam: Course Lectures, transcripts prepared by Wan Mohd. Shukri, (Kuala Lumpur: n.p., 1998).____________, Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam, (Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 2001).____________, Historical Fact and Fiction, (Johor Bahru: UTM Press, 2011).____________, On Justice and the Nature of Man, (Kuala Lumpur: IBFIM & Akademi Kenegaraan, 2015).Açikgenç, Alparslan. “Kant and Ghazali On Human Nature: A Comparative Philosophy of Man”, in Wan Mohd Nor Wan Daud and Muhammad Zainiy Uthman (eds.), Knowledge, Language, Thought and The Civilization of Islam: Essays in Honor of Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas, (Skudai: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2010).Akdogan, Cemil. Science in Islam and the West, (Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization-International Islamic University Malaysia, 2008).Al-Maghluth, Sami bin ‘Abdillah. Aṭlas Târîkh al-Anbiyâ’ wa al-Rusul, (Riyâḍ: Maktabah al-‘Abîkân, 1998).Allawi, Ali A. The Crisis of Islamic Civilization, (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2009).Al-Tabari, Abu Ja‘far Muhammad bin Jarir. Târîkh al-Umam wa al-Mulûk (‘Ammân: Bayt al-Afkâr al-Dauliyyah, n.y.).Bakar, Osman. (ed.) Critique of Evolutionary Theory A Collection of Essays, (Kuala Lumpur: The Islamic Academy of Science and Nurin Enterprise, 1987).Bryson, Bill. A Short History of Nearly Everything, (New York: Broadway Books, 2003).Chown, Marcus. The Magic Furnace: The Search for the Origins of Atoms, (London: Jonathan Cape, 1999).Darwin, Charles. On The Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection Or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, (London: ElecBook, 1997), based on the first edition, 1895.Ehlert, Trude. “Muhammad,” in Encyclopedia of Islam, eds. C.E. Bosworth et al., Vol. VII, (Leiden-New York: E.J. Brill, 1993), new edition.Ford, Norman M. When Did I begin: Conception of Human Individual in History, Philosophy and Science, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Greene, Jon W. “A Biblical Case for Old-Earth Creationism,” an article in pdf form, p. 7, retrieved from http://godandscience.org/youngearth/old_earth_creationism.html.Ibnu Kathir, Abu al-Fida’ al-Hafiz. al-Bidâyah wa’l-Nihâyah, (Bayrût: Maktabah al-Ma‘ârir, 1990).Iqbal, Muhammad. The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam, edited and annotated by M. Saeed Sheikh, (New Delhi: Adam Publishers & Distributors, 2005).Kuhn, Alvin Boyd. The Lost Light: An Interpretation of Ancient Scriptures, (Eastford: Martino Publishing, 2015), reprint version of 1940 edition.Lings, Martin. “Science Knows Nothing About the Origin of Man,” in Osman Bakar (ed.), Critique of Evolutionary Theory A Collection of Essays, (Kuala Lumpur: The Islamic Academy of Science and Nurin Enterprise, 1987).Löfstedt, Torsten. “The Creation and Fall of Adam: A Comparison of the Qur’anic and Biblical Accounts,” in Swedish Missiological Themes, 93, 4 (2005).Pedersen, J. “Adam,” in Encyclopedia of Islam, eds. by H.A.R. Gibb et al., Vol. 1, (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1986).Pretorius, Mark. “The Creation and the Fall of Adam and Eve: Literal, Symbolic, or Myth?” Conspectus, Vol. 12, (South African Theological Seminary, 2011).Rana, Fazale. “Who Was Adam? An Old-Earth Creation Model for the Origin of Humanity,” retrieved from http://www.reasons.org/articles/who-was-adam-an-old-earth-creation-model-for-the-origin-of-humanity.Rana, Fazale. et al., Who Was Adam? A Creation Model Approach to the Origin of Man, (Colorado, CO: NavPress, 2005).Rida, Muhammad Rashid. Tafsîr al-Manâr, (al-Qâhirah: Dâr al-Manâr, 1947).Risallah, Fiqih. “Keadilan dan Fitrah Manusia,” Islamia, Vol. X, No. 2, (August, 2016).Smith, Sir William. et al., Chambers Murray Latin-English Dictionary, (Edinburgh: Chambers, 2000).Wan Daud, Wan Mohd. Nor. The Concept of Knowledge in Islam and its Implications for Education in A Developing Country, (London and New York: Mansell, 1989).____________, The Commemorative Volume on the Conferment of the al-Ghazzali Chair of Islamic Thought, (Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1994).____________, The Educational Philosophy and Practice of Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas: An Exposition of the Original Concept of Islamization, (Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1998).____________, “Al-Attas: A Real Reformer and Thinker,” in Wan Mohd Nor Wan Daud and Muhammad Zainiy Uthman (eds.), Knowledge, Language, Thought and The Civilization of Islam: Essays in Honor of Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas, (Skudai: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2010).Wan Daud, Wan Mohd Nor. et al., Knowledge, Language, Thought and The Civilization of Islam: Essays in Honor of Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas, (Skudai: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2010).Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Bible Doctrine, (Leicester & Michigan: Inter-Varsity Press & Zondervan Publishing House, 1994).Webb, Jennifer M. (ed.), Powerful Ideas: Perspectives on the Good Society, (Melbourne: The Cranlana Program, 2002).Will Durant, The Story of Civilization, (New York: Our Oriental Heritage, 1935).

Downloads

Submitted

2019-08-31

Accepted

2019-11-05

Published

2019-11-05