Evrengzīb Ālemgīrī Hān of the Timurid Dynasty and the Criminal Code (Ta'zirat)

Authors

  • Ahmed Akgunduz Islamic University of Rotterdam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v20i1.11882

Keywords:

Muhyiddin Evrengzib, Alemgir, Timurid Dynasty, Tazirat, Tazir, Canon law, Qanun-i munif, Tazirat-i Alemgiri, Shari-i Sharif, Multeka al-abhur, Fetavay-i Hindiye, Public Interest, Politics, Legal Regulation

Abstract

The Timurid dynasty was a Turkish dynasty founded by Emir Timur in 1370 and destroyed bythe British in 1858. They founded the Timurid Empire (1370-1507), which ruled Iran and CentralAsia, and the Mughal Empire (1526-1857) in India. A member of the aristocratic Timurid dynasty,Evrengzīb Hān, was the sixth emperor of the Mughal Empire, ruling from July 1658 until his deathin 1707.During the reign of Muhyiddin Evrengzīb Ālemgir I (1658-1707), the powerful sultan of theMuslim Turkish state known as the Mughal Empire or the Mongols of India, three important codeswere issued: The first is the Fetāwāy-ı Hindiye (also called Fetāwāy-ı Ālemgirīya or Fetāwāy-ıCihāngīya), which was compiled entirely from fiqh books and compiled sharī'ah rulings. The secondis Ālemgirī's Code of State Organisation, which is called AHKAM-I-ALAMGIRI and translated intoEnglish by Hamid-ud-din Khan Bahadur under the title ANECDOTES OF AURANGZIB. The third isĀyīn-i Akbarī or Ahkām-i Ālemgirī, a collection of laws similar to the first chapter of the OttomanGeneral Qanunnāmas, which regulates the part of the customary law especially related to ta'zīrpunishments. It is known as Ta'zīrāt-ı Ālemgīrī.In this article, we will translate the Ta'zīrāt-ı Ālemgīrī, of which there is only one copy in theworld, into Turkish and analyse it according to Islamic law. The original of the Qanunnam is inPersian and there is only one copy of it in the world. Although the existence of this Qanunname hasbeen mentioned before, it has not yet been published in scholarly circles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akgündüz, Ahmed, Osmanlı Kânunnâmeleri ve Hukukî Tahlilleri, c. I-IV (İstanbul: OSAV, 1989-2000).

Akgündüz, Ahmed. (1986). Mukayeseli Islâm ve Osmanli Hukuku Kulliyati. Diyarbakır: Dijle University.

Akgündüz/Hey'et, Şer’iye Sicilleri, II, İstanbul 1988.

Akgündüz, Ahmed. (2011). Islamic Public Law. Rotterdam: IUR Press.

Akgündüz, Ahmed. (2010). Introduction to Islâmic Law. Rotterdam: IUR Press.

Alan Guenther (2006), “Hanafi Fiqh in Mughal India: The Fatawa-i Alamgiri”, in Richard Eaton (Editor), India's Islamic Traditions: 711-1750, Oxford University Press, s. 209-230.

Al-Bernhapuri, Nazarudeen. Fatawa Hindiyyah. 1st ed. Vol. 1. 6 vols. Damascus, Beirut, Kuwait: Dar an-Nawadir, 2013.

Al-Isfahânî, Mufradât Alfâz al-Kur’an, Beyrut ty.

Ali Muhammed Hân, Mir'ât-ı Ahmedî, I, Baroda 1928, sh. 277-283 (Farsça Metin)

al-Qarrâfî, al-Ḏaḫîrah, c. XII.

al-Kashani, Badâyiʿ al-Sanâyiʿ, Beyrut 1974, c. VII.

̒Awdah, al-Tashrîʻ al-Jinâî al-Islâmî, c. I, Beyrut ts.

BOA, YEE-14-1540, Devlet-i Aliyedeki Islâhat-ı Kanûnîye (Legal Reforms in the Ottoman State), vr. 26-27.

Ceza Kânunname-i Humâyûnu, 1858, Article I.

Dâmâd, Majmaʻ al-Anhur Sharhu Mülteqâ al-Abhur, İstanbul 1331.

Ebû Ya’la, al-Aḥkâm al-Sulṭâniyyah, Mısır 1357.

Ebussu‘ûd Efendi, Risâle Fil-‘Öşr , Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Raşid Efendi, no. 1036, vr. 33-41.

Fatih Yavuz ve Qanunî Kânunnâmesi, Osmanlı Qanunnameleri, I, III.

Gerber, Haim, State, Society, and Law in Islam: Ottoman Law in Comparative Perspective (Albany: SUNY Press, 1994).

Heyd, Uriel, Studies in Old Ottoman Criminal Law, Oxford 1973.

Hussein, S M (2002). Structure of Politics Under Aurangzeb 1658-1707. Kanishka Publishers Distributors.

Ishwari Prasad, A Short History of Muslim Rule in India from the Advent of Islam to the Death of Aurangzeb (Allahabad: Indian Press, 1965).

İbn Teymiyye, al-Siyâsah al-Shar‘iyyah fî Islâh al-Râ‘î wa al-Ra‘iyyah, Mısır 1969.

İbnü’1-Kayyım EI-Cevzî, İ’lâmü’l-Muvakkıîn, Beyrut, 1970, c IV.

___,al-Turuq al-Ḥukmiyyah Fî al-Siyâsah al-Shar‘iyyah, Mısır 1317.

J. Sarkar, Mughal Administration, Calcutta 1935.

Jamal Malik (2008), Islam in South Asia: A Short History, Brill Academic.

Qanunî Ceza Kânunnâmesi, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi. Esat Ef. 2362, vr. 3/a; Ali Emiri, Kav 74/1-bvd.

Kânunnâme, IÜ. Ty. 1807, vr. 3vd.

Koç, Yunus, “Early Ottoman Customary Law”, in Dostal and Kraus, Shattering Tradition,

Kur’an.

Majid Ḥadduri, Herbert J. Liebesny, and Robert H. Jackson, Origin and Development of Islâmîc Law (The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., 2008);

Molla Ḫusrev, Durar al-Ḥukkâm, c. II, XI, İstanbul 1317.

Nevevî, Kitâb al-Majmû‘ Sharh al-Muhaḏḏab, Mısır ts, c. xxii.

Nizami, Khalıq Ahmad, “Evrengzib”, Diyanet İslam Ansiklopedisi, XI, 537-539.

Özel, Ahmet, “Âlemgîriyye”, Diyanet İslam Ansiklopedisi, II, 365-366.

Richards, John F., The Mughal Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).

R. De Seife, The Shar’ia: An Introduction to The Law of Islam (London: Austin & Winfield, 1994).

Sircar, The Muhammadan Law.

Taqvim-i Vaqâyi, I. Tertip, Sy. I vd.

Taner, Tahir, Ceza Hukuku (İstanbul: Ankara Üniversitesi, 1949).

Ta’zīrāt, Āsitān-ı Kuds-i Radavī, Kitabhāne-i Merkezi, Yazma Eserler, No: 71523.

The Committee, al-Mawsû‘ah al-Fiqhiyyah, c. XV, (Kuwait: The Ministry of Awqâf, 1989), sh. 242-47.

Downloads

Submitted

2024-03-12

Accepted

2024-05-25

Published

2024-05-26