OBEDIENCE PREDICTOR USING SELF PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT AT PT MEGA ANDALAN KALASAN

prasetyawati prasetyawati

Abstract

Personality is a distinctive part of each individual. This is what distinguishes one individual from another. Personality is an individual characteristic with consistent patterns of behavior, feelings and thoughts. This study aims to determine the effect of employee personality types on compliance using PPE with additional internal and external variables. Personality (sanguinis, melancholy, kolerik and plegmatis), age, education, knowledge, and comfort of PPE were analyzed as independent variables and compliance using PPE as a dependent variable. The personality definition used is personality plus in Littauer with four personality types namely Sanguinis, Kolerik, Melancholy and Plegmatis. This study has a quantitative research approach, with observational research types. The design of this research is cross sectional study. This research was conducted at PT Mega Andalan Kalasan (MAK), Yogyakarta. This research sample amounted to 92 workers with sampling technique using stratified random sampling technique. Based on the chi-square test with the results of p-value 0.011, which means that it shows a significant relationship between personality types with compliance using PPE. In addition, age also shows significant results. Conclusion: Type of personality and age affect the use of PPE in workers at PT. MAK.


Keywords: Personality, Obedience, Personal Protective Equipment

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
Download full (Indonesian) - 0 times

References

Azis, H., 2010. Hubungan Antara Karakteristik dan Tipe Kepribadian Pekerja Dengan Tingkat Kepatuhan Penggunaan alat Pelindung Diri. Skripsi; Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat. Universitas Airlangga.

Cooper, D., 2009. Personality Theories: An Introduction. USA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.

Doy, Saputri, I.A., 2014. Faktor-faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Kepatuhan Penggunaan APD pada Pekerja Kerangka Bangunan. Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan, Vol.1, No. 1, Jan-April 2014. Hal. 120-131.

Geller, E.S., 2001. The Psychology of Safety Handbook. New York: Lewis Publiser.

Hastanti, R., 2004. Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Pemakaian APD pada Pekerja Konstruksi Bangunan. Skripsi; Surabaya: FKM Universitas Airlangga.

Heinrich, H.W. 1980. Industrial Prevention: A Safety Management Approach. New York: M cGraw-Hill Inc.

Littauer, F., 2011. Personality Plus: Kepribadian Plus. Tangerang: Karisma.

Notoatmodjo, S., 2007. Promosi Kesehatan dan Ilmu Perilaku. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

OHSAS 18001:2007. Occupational Health and Safety Management System – Requirement.

OSHAcademy. 2013. Personal Protective Equipment. Beaverton: OSHAcademy.

Peraturan Menteri Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi RI No PER.08/MEN/VII/2010 Tentang Alat Pelindung Diri.

Pervin, dkk., 2010. Psikologi Kepribadian Teori dan Penelitian. Jakarta: Kencana.

Phuspa, S.M., dan Rudyarti, E. 2017. The Relationship of Belief, Experience, Knowledge and Attitude Toward Safety Behavior of Construction Workers at University X Ponorogo. Indonesian Journal for Health Science. Vol 1, No 2, Hal 34-41

Reason. 2007. Managing The risk of Organizational Accident. Ashgade: Publising Ltd. Aldershot Hants.

Sastrohadiwiryo, S., 2005. Manajemen Tenaga Kerja Indonesia: Pendekatan Administratif dan operasional. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Sumarna, D.P., 2013. Determinan pengetahuan Alat Pelindung Diri (APD) pada karyawan Percetakan di Kota Makassar. Available from: http://repository.unhas.ac.id/bitsream/handle/123456789/5511/jurnal.pdf [accessed 19 Juli 2016].

Tarwaka. 2008. Manajemen dan Implementasi K3 di Tempat Kerja. Surakarta: Harapan Press.

Wibowo, A., 2010. Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan Dengan Perilaku Penggunaan Alat Pelindung Diri di Areal Pertambangan PT. Antam Tbk Unit Bisnis Pertambangan Emas Pongkor Kabupaten Bogor. Skripsi, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.