A Comparative Study of Natural Law Theories: The Views of Thomas F. Wall and Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21111/tasfiyah.v9i1.13989Keywords:
Abstract
This article aims to analyze and compare the perspectives of Thomas F. Wall and Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas on the concept of natural law, highlighting their differing philosophical traditions. Wall, in “Critical Thinking”, presents a secular understanding of natural law, arguing that it is a human construct originating solely from human reasoning, independent of any divine authority. In contrast, al-Attas, in “Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam”, asserts that natural law, or sunnatullah, is divinely ordained, reflecting God's will in governing the universe while involving human participation. This study employs a philosophical approach grounded in the Islamic worldview to examine and contrast their interpretations, utilizing content analysis to systematically interpret the key arguments in their respective works. The findings reveal a fundamental divergence between the two perspectives: Wall perceives natural law as an innate principle recognized by human reason as the highest moral and ethical authority, whereas al-Attas views it as a manifestation of divine order that governs creation. This contrast underscores the broader epistemological differences between the Western secular and Islamic metaphysical worldviews in understanding the foundation and authority of natural law.References
Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. Islam and Secularism. Second. Kuala Lumpur: Intenational Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC), 1993.
———. Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam: An Exposition of the Fundamental Element of the Worldview of Islam. Kuala lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 1995.
Al-Faruqi, Ismail Raji. Tauhid. Bandung: Penerbit Pustaka, 1995.
Al-Sya’rawi, Muhammad Mutawalli. Qiṣaṣ Al-Anbiyā’ Wa Ma’ahā Sīrah Al-Rasūl. Beirut: Darul Qudus, 2006.
Aquinas, Thomas. The Summa Theologica, Volume 1. Edited by Daniel J. Sullivan. Chicago, London: William Benton, 1923.
Aristoteles. Etika Nikomakea. Edited by Trans. Ratih Dwi Astuti and Editor. Wawan Kurn. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Basabasi, 2020.
Burns, Tony. “Aristotle and Natural Law.” History of Political Thought 19, no. 2 (1998): 142–66.
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. On The Commonwealth. Edited by Trans. George Holland Sabine & Stanley Barney Smith. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University Press, 1929.
Coolman, Boyd Taylor. “William of Auxerre.” In Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy, edited by Henrik Lagerlund, 1405–7. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_531.
Cooper, Kody W. “Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law.” The Review of Politics 81, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvpj7dr3.
D’Entrèves, Alessandro Passerin. Natural Law An Introduction to Legal Philosophy. London: Hutchinson University Library, 1970.
Effendy, Hilman Sattriady, Muhammad Kevin Arya Jasrianto, Rieke Dewinta Rahma, and Mohammad Alvi Pratama. “Hukum Alam Menurut William Auxerre Hilman.” Praxis: Jurnal Filsafat Terapan 1, no. 2 (2024): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.11111/praxis.xxxxxxx.
Eribo, Nosakhare Monday, and Benson Oghenero Kano. “The Conception of Natural Law in Thomas Aquinas’ Philosophy.” Albertine Journal of Philosophy & Related Disciplines 3 (2019): 47–52. https://doi.org/10.5507/sth.2017.088.
Eytan, Yuval. “Hobbes on Scientific Happiness.” Philosophical Papers 52, no. 1 (January 2, 2023): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2023.2237695.
Frederick, Danny. “A Puzzle About Natural Laws and the Existence of God.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73, no. 3 (June 2, 2013): 269–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-012-9343-8.
González, Ana Marta. “Contemporary Perspectives on Natural Law: Natural Law as a Limiting Concept.” Taylor and Francis, 2016, 1–542. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315573915.
Haidary, Abdullah Haq Al, Achmad Reza Hutama Al Faruqi, Abbas Shofwan MF, and Rif’at Husnul Ma’afi. “Islamic Worldview as a Basis of Islamization of Science Concept According to Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas.” Kalam: Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam 18, no. 1 (2024): 19–36. https://doi.org/10.24042/002024181145700.
Hakim, Usmanul, and Winda Roini. “Identifikasi Worldview Dalam Ilmu Pengetahuan Barat Kontemporer Menurut Syed Muhammad Naquib Al Attas.” Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 3, no. 2 (2019): 53. https://doi.org/10.21111/tasfiyah.v3i2.3498.
Hidayatullah, Elit Ave, and Syamsuddin Arif. “Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas’ Exposition on the Concept of Ethics.” Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam 24, no. 1 (June 30, 2022): 409–46. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol24no1.12.
Ikram, Mhd. Rafi. “Konsep Sunnatullah Dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an (Studi Komparatif Tafsir Al-Maraghi Karya Ahmad Mustafa Al-Maraghi Dan Tafsir Al-Azhar Karya Buya Hamka).” Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar, 2022. https://repo.uinmybatusangkar.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/25439.
Islam, Ach. Syaiful, Suhermanto Ja’far, and Ahmad Sunawari Long. “Islam and Eco-Theology: Perspectives and Strategies of Muhammadiyah in Addressing the Environmental Crisis.” Fikri: Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya 9, no. 2 (2024): 170–81. https://journal.iaimnumetrolampung.ac.id/index.php/jf/article/view/4821.
Khakim, Usmanul, Teguh Kurniyanto, Mahendra Utama Cahya Ramadhan, Muhammad Habiburrahman, and Muhammad Iksan Rahmadian. “God and Worldview According to Al-Attas and Wall.” Tsaqafah: Jurnal Peradaban Islam 16, no. 2 (November 21, 2020). https://doi.org/10.21111/TSAQAFAH.V16I2.4853.
Khakim, Usmanul, Khasib Amrullah, Hifni Nasif, “Metode Sains: Membaca Pemikiran Epistemologis al Attas dan Wall,” IJOIS: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Studies 2, no. 2, (2021), https://doi.org/10.59525/ijois.v2i2.39
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: The Syndics of the Cambridge University Press, 1960.
Maksudin, Mohamad Yasin Yusuf, and Robingun. “Thinking Map Pendekatan Integrasi Interkoneksi Agama Dan Sains Teknologi (Berbasis Al-QUr’an Dan Sunnatullah).” Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga, 2020. http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/48338.
Nagasawa, Yujin. The Existence of God. USA: Routledge, 2011.
Najib, Abdul Hakim Bin Mohamad. “Sunnatullah Dalam Perspektif Ulama Dayah (Studi Kasus Sekitar Kota Banda Aceh Dan Aceh Besar).” UIN Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh-Indonesia, 2019. http://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id.
Nidawati, Nidawati. “Alam Dan Sunnatullah Dalam Implementasi Pendidikan Sepanjang Hayat (Life Long Education).” Pionir: Jurnal Pendidikan 5, no. 1 (2016): 15–32. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/pjp.v5i1.163.
Sharif, M.M. A History of Muslim Philosophy: With Short Accounts of Other Disciplines and the Modern Renaissance in Muslim Lands. Wiesbaden, Germany: Otto Harrassowitz, 1963.
Vieru, Simona. “Aristotle’s Influence on the Natural Law Theory of St Thomas Aquinas.” The Western Australian Jurist 1, no. (2010): 115–22. http://dictionary.oed.com.prospero.murdoch.edu.au/cgi/entry.
Wall, Thomas F. Thinking Critically about Philosophical Problems. Canada: Scarborough, 2001.
Zarkasyi, Hamid Fahmy. Kausalitas Hukum Alam Dan Tuhan: Membaca Pemikiran Regio-Saintifik Al-Ghazali. Edited by Yusuf Maulana. Ponorogo: UNIDA Gontor Press, 2018.
Zulaika, Cici. “Penciptaan Alam Menurut Imam Al-Ghazali.” Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta, 2018. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/40617.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- The copyright of received articles shall be assigned to Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish articles in various forms (including reprints). Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam maintain the publishing rights to the published articles.
- Authors are permitted to disseminate published article by sharing the link/DOI of the article at Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam. authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam with an acknowledgement of initial publication to this journal.
- Users/public use of this website will be licensed to CC BY-NC-SA (Attribution & Non-Commercial-ShareAlike)
