Domain Diri dalam Adab Guru Menurut Imam Abu Ḥanifah: Kajian Ke Arah Membentuk Etika Profesi Perguruan Islam

Authors

  • Mohd Anuar Mamat ISLAMIC SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v13i1.1823

Keywords:

Abū Ḥanīfah, code of ethics, Islamic teachers, personal domain, Rules of conduct.

Abstract

The rules of conduct for teachers is one of the important elements in Islamic education. It is closely associated with the effort to the realization of a quality education and an effective teaching. This article presents the personal domain in this topic as elaborated by Imam Abū Ḥanīfah in his educational treatises, namely al-‘Ālim wa al-Muta‘allim, Waṣiyyah Abī Ḥanīfah li Abī Yūsuf, Waṣiyyah Abū Ḥanīfah li Ibnihi Ḥammād, and Waṣiyyah Abū Ḥanīfah ilā Tilmīdhihi Yūsuf bin Khālid al-Samtī al-Baṣrī. The authors found that there are seven elements in personal domain suggested by Abū Ḥanīfah in his educational treatises. These elements namely, sincerely in learning and teaching; pay attention in improving the deeds of taqwa, worship, fasting and reciting al-Quran; plan wisely in managing time, avoiding less important matters, optimizing learning, and self-esteem; being aware of God's attention, feeling the sufficiency of His gift, living in khauf (fear) and rajā '(hopefully) and kind thoughts about Him; keeping dignity and acting as a teacher by doing good things and be modest in every business; avoid bad and vain actions and always be enthusiastic in performing a job as a teacher. These elements are very important in teachers’ profession. This study is also intended to reveal this topic based on Islamic scholar thought in order to formulate the professional code of ethics for Islamic teachers and to solve ethical problems nowadays.

References

‘Abd al-Karīm bin Muḥammad al-Sama‘ānī. al-Ansāb, Muḥammad ‘Abd al-Qādir ‘Aṭā (pynt.). (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1998).

‘Abd Allāh bin ‘Adī al-Jurjānī. al-Kāmil fi Du‘afā’ al-Rijāl, Suhayl Zakkār (pynt.). (Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. 1988).

‘Alī Jalabī bin Amr Allāh Ibn Ḥannā’ī. Ṭabaqāt al-Ḥanafiyyah, Sufyān ‘Ᾱish & Firās bin Khalīl (pynt.). (Jordon: Dār Ibn al-Jawzi, 2003).

Abdul Rahman Md. Aroff. Pendidikan Moral: Teori Etika dan Amalan Moral. (Serdang: UPM, 2008).

Abū al-Faraj Muḥammad bin Abū Ya‘qūb Isḥāq al-Nadīm. al-Fihrist. taḥqīq Yūsuf ‘Alī Ṭawīl. (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1996).

Abu al-Wafā al-Qurashī, ‘Abd al-Qādir bin Abī al-Wafā Muḥammad bin Nuṣr Allāh bin Sālim. al-Jawāhir al-Muḍiyyah fi Ṭabaqāt al-Ḥanafiyyah. (Karachi: Miz Kutub Khanah Aram Bagh, t.t.).

Abū Ḥanīfah, al-Nu‘mān bin Thābit. al-‘Ālim wa al-Muta‘allim. Muḥammad Zāhid bin Ḥasan al-Kawtharī (pnyt). (Miṣr: al-Maktabah al-Azhariyyah li al-Turāth, 2001).

Ahmad Sunawari Long. Pengantar Falsafah. (Selangor: Penerbit UKM, 2006).

al-Albānī, Wahbī Sulaymān Ghāwijī. Abū Ḥanīfah al-Nu‘mān: Imām al-A’immah al-Fuqahā’. (Dimashq: Dār al-Qalam, 1978).

al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. Himpunan Risalah. (Kuala Lumpur: IBFIM & CASIS, 2015).

al-Baghdādī al-Bābānī, Ismā‘īl Bāshā. Hadiyyah al-‘Ārifīn: Asmā’ al-Mu’allafīn wa Āthār al-Muṣannafīn. j.2. (Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī, 1955).

al-Dhahabī, Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad bin Aḥmad bin ‘Uthmān. Siyar al-A‘lām al-Nubalā’. Shu‘ayb al-Arnout & Ḥusayn Asad (pnyt). c.11. j.6. (Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risālah. 1996).

al-Ghazali, Muhammad bin Muhamad. Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din. (Jeddah: Dar al-Minhaj. 2011).

al-Jurjānī, ‘Alī bin Muḥammad bin ‘Alī. al-Ta‘rifāt, ed. Muḥammad Bāsal ‘Uyūn al-Sawd. (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. 2000).

al-Kurdarī, Hāfiẓ al-Dīn bin Muḥammad. Manāqib Abī Hanīfah. (Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-‘Arabī. 1981).

al-Makkī, al-Muwaffaq bin Aḥmad. Manāqib Abī Hanīfah. (Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-‘Arabī, 1981).

al-Ṣaymarī, Abū ‘Abdillah Ḥusayn bin ‘Alī. Akhbār Abī Ḥanīfah wa Aṣḥābuh, c.2. (T.T.P: ‘Ālam al-Kutub. 1985).

al-Tamīmī al-Dārī, Taqī al-Dīn bin ‘Abd al-Qādir. al-Ṭabaqāt al-Saniyyah fi Tarājum al-Ḥanafiyyah. ‘Abd al-Fattāḥ Muḥammad al-Hilw (pnyt). (Riyad: Dār al-Rifa‘ī. 1983).

al-Zarnūjī, Burhān al-Dīn. Ta‘līm al-Muta‘allim Ṭarīq al-Ta‘allum. Muṣṭafā ‘Āshūr (pnyṭ). (Būlāq: Kaherah. 1986).

Aymān Muḥammad ‘Abd al-‘Azīz. al-Turāth al-Tarbawī fi al-Madhhab al-Ḥanafī, (Iskandariyyah: Maktabah al-‘Ilm wa al-Īmān. 2008).

Bahagian Pendidikan Guru. Standard Guru Malaysia. (Putrajaya: Bahagian Pendidikan Guru, 2009).

Bertens. K. Etika dan Moral Untuk Pengajian Tinggi. (Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit UM, 2003).

Brockelmann, Carl. Tārīkh al-Adab al-‘Arabī. Maḥmūd Fahmī Ḥijāzī (terj.). (Qaherah: Hai’ah al-Miṣriyyah al-‘Āmmah li al-Kitāb. 1993).

Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Kamus Dewan, Edsi Ekonomi. (Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, 2015).

Foo Say Fooi. Etika Perguruan Jaminan Peningkatan Profesionalisme. (Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia. 2005).

Gunther, Sebastian. Ideas, Images, and the Methods of Portrayal: Insights into Classical Arabic Literature and Islam. (Leiden: Brill. 2005).

Ḥājī Khalīfah, Muṣṭafā bin ‘Abd Allāh. Kashf al-Ẓunūn. (Kaherah: Dār al-Fikr. 1982).

Iblāgh, ‘Ināyat Allāh. al-Imām al-A‘ẓam Abū Ḥanīfah al-Mutakallim. (T.T.P.: al-Majlis al-A‘lā li al-Shu‘ūn al-Islāmiyyah, 1971).

Ibn al-Hannā’ī, ‘Alī Jalabī bin Amr Allāh bin ‘Abd al-Qādir. Ṭabaqāt al-Ḥanafiyyah. Sufyān bin ‘Āyish bin Muḥammad & Firās bin Khalīl Mash‘al (pynt). (‘Amman: Dār Ibn Jawzī, 2003).

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia. (Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, 2013).

Mohd Anuar Mamat & Wan Suhaimi Wan Abdullah, “Adab Ilmuwan Menurut Imam Abū Ḥanīfah (m.150H): Suntingan Ilmiah, Terjemahan dan Analisis Waṣiyyah Abī Ḥanīfah Li Tilmīdhihi Yūsuf Al-Samtī”, AFKAR 18, Isu 2, (2016).

Mohd Anuar Mamat & Wan Suhaimi Wan Abdullah, “Adab-adab Guru menurut Imām Abū Ḥanīfah: Kajian terhadap Waṣiyyah Abī Ḥanīfah li Abī Yūsuf”, TAFHIM 7, (2014).

Mohd Anuar Mamat & Wan Suhaimi Wan Abdullah, “Tujuan Pendidikan dan Kaedah Pengajaran Abū Ḥanīfah dalam Kitab al-‘Ālim wa al-Muta‘allim”, AFKAR 11, (2010).

Mohd Anuar Mamat, “Meningkatkan Kualiti Amalan sebagai Tujuan Pendidikan Abū Ḥanīfah: Suatu Analisis Perbandingan”, Jurnal Usuluddin 37, (2013).

Mohd Anuar Mamat, Mohd Manawi Mohd Akib & Basri Husin, “Prinsip-Prinsip Ahl al-Sunnah dan al-Jamā‘ah: Pengenalan Dan Terjemahan Melayu Waṣiyyah Imam Abū Ḥanīfah”, AFKAR Khas, (2014).

Mohd Anuar Mamat, Wan Suhaimi Wan Abdullah & Muhammad Basthami Abdullah, “Waṣiyyah Abī Ḥanīfah li Ibnihi Ḥammād: Suatu Suntingan Ilmiah dan Terjemahan”, Jurnal Usuluddin 41, (2015).

Mohd Anuar Mamat. Pemikiran Pendidikan Imam Abū Ḥanīfah: Kitab al-‘Alim wa al-Muta‘allim. (Kuala Lumpur: CASIS & HAKIM. 2016).

Muḥammad Abū Zahrah. Abū Ḥanīfah: Ḥayātuhū, wa ‘Aṣruhū wa Ārā’uhū wa Fiqhuhū. (Kaherah: Dār al-Fikr al-‘Arabī, t.t.).

Sezgin, Fuat. Tārīkh al-Turāth al-‘Arabī. Maḥmūd Fahmī Ḥijāzī (terj.). (T.T.P: Idārah al-Thāqafah wa al-Nashr bi al-Jāmi‘ah. 1983).

Sharifah Hayaati Ismail Al-Qudsy. Etika Penjawat Awam Dari Perspektif Islam. (Kuala Lumpur: DBP. 2010).

Yaḥyā Ḥasan ‘Alī Murād. Ᾱdāb al-‘Ᾱlim wa al-Muta‘allim ‘inda al-Mufakkirīn al-Muslimīn. (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. 2003).

Downloads

Published

2018-06-15

How to Cite

Mamat, M. A. (2018). Domain Diri dalam Adab Guru Menurut Imam Abu Ḥanifah: Kajian Ke Arah Membentuk Etika Profesi Perguruan Islam. At-Ta’dib, 13(1), 105–138. https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v13i1.1823