The Instant Mastery of Kitab Kuning with the Al-Bidayah Method: Between Kiai Fractured Authority and Pesantren Tradition Preservation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/attadib.v19i2.11795

Keywords:

Al-Bidayah, Kitab Kuning, Fraktur Otoritas, Contestation, Authority

Abstract

This research discusses the kitab kuning learning method in Islamic boarding schools called the Al-Bidayah method and how this approach is narrated as the antithesis of the bandongan approach tradition that has been established in pesantren. In pesantren, bandongan is considered by observers as a method that inherits the culture of rigid social class relations in Islamic boarding schools, especially between kiai, santri and society as a social group that is the object of the kiai's preaching. This is due to the basic character of bandongan which is designed to create an exclusive distance between the three social groups above. Meanwhile, the Al-Bidayah method has an inclusive basic character and with its mixture of the great traditions of pesantren and pop-culture typical of the younger generation, it can instantly break down rigid social divisions and classes. To discuss the social phenomena, this research uses Pierre Felix Bourdieu's theory of cultural reproduction and habitus. The results of this research state that the Al-Bidayah method uses an inter-directional learning and meaning model so that the students' abilities are more dynamic. The Al-Bidayah method also emphasizes discursive learning patterns with the language of instruction being translated from Arabic, but using Indonesian, so the researcher concludes that this approach is a form of desacralization of nahwu-sharaf which has been a special science in pesantren into a discipline that can be consumed and discussed. This approach also breaks down the chain of cultural reproduction of the bandongan tradition which emphasizes one-way learning and relies entirely on the authority of the kiai as the merely source of information and source of truth so that students who learn using this method will then, after returning to take part in society, be able to become social agents. in creating close relations between kiai, santri and the community.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Muchlish Huda, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo

Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo

Mohammad Muslih, Darussalam University Gontor

Depastment of Aqidah and Islamic Philosophy

References

Afendi, Arief Hidayat, Ratna Endang Widuatie, Titih Nursugiharti, Agus Yulianto, and Al-Amin Al-Amin. 2024. “Reviving the Legacy of KH Hasyim Asy’ari: Embracing Techno-Islamic Pedagogy for Contemporary Education”. At-Ta’dib 19 (1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.21111/attadib.v19i1.12247.

Albright, James. Deborah Hartman, Jacqueline Widin. 2018. Bourdieu’s Field Theory and the Social Sciences. Singapore: Springer.

Azizah, Nurul. Joseph Okwesili Nkwede & Mohammad Armoyu. 2021. The Octopus-Like Power of Pesantren Dynasty in the Dynamics of Local Politics. Cogent Social Sciences. 7:1, DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2021.1962056

Bano, Masooda. 2018. Modern Islamic Authority and Social Change. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.

Bauman, Z. Post-Modernity and its Discontents. New York: New York University Press

Bourdieu, Pierre & Wacquant. Tt. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Terj: L. Wacquant. Cambridge: Polity.

Bourdieu, Pierre. “Genesis and Structure of Religious Field”, Comparative Social Research, 13. 1-44.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. In Other Words: Essays Towards a Refletive Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Terj: R. Nice. Cambridge: Polity.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. Sociology in Question. Terj: R. Nice. London: Sage Publication

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1994. In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology. Terj: M. Adamson. Cambridge: Polity.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Practical Reason: On te Thery of Action. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Boyle, Helen. N. 2004. Quranic Schools: Agents Of Preservation and Change. New York: Routledge.

Buisman, Jan Wim. Marjek Derks & Peter Raedets (Ed). 2015. Episcopacy, Authority and Gender: Aspects of Religious Leadership in Europe. Leiden: Koninklijke.

Burhani, Ahmad Najib. 2018. “Plural Islam and Contestation of Religious Authority in Indonesia” dalam Noorsahril Saat, Islam in Southeast Asia. Singapore: ISEAS.

Castells, M. 1997. The Power of Identity. Cambridge: MA Blackwell.

Chaves, Mark. 1994. “Secularization as Declining Religious Authority”, Social Forces. March.

Dhofier, Zamakhsyarie. 2011. Tradisi Pesantren, Studi Pandangan Hidup Kiai dan Visinya Mengenai Masa Depan Indonesia. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Eickelman, Dale. F. 1985. Knowledge and Power in Morocco: The Education of a twentieth-Century Notable. Princetton NJ: Princetton University Press.

Fadhillah, Kharis. 2016. “Manajemen Mutu Pendidikan Islam Di Pesantren (Studi Di Pondok Modern Darussalam Gontor)”. At-Ta’dib 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v10i1.333.

Giddens, Anthony. 1997. Central Problem in Social Theory. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press

Giorgi, Alberta. 2019. “Mediatized Catholicism: Minority Voices and Religious Authority in the Digital Sphere”. Religions. 10 (463:1-21).

Grenfell, M. (Ed). 2010. Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts. Durham: Acumen.

Grenfell, M. 2007. Pierre Bourdieu: Education and Training. London: Continum.

Halstead, Mark. 2004. “An Islamic Concept Of Education”, Comparative Education 40 (4).

Haris, Abdul. 2022. Apliksi I’rab. Jember: Pustaka Al-Bidayah.

Haris, Abdul. 2022. Pelengkap Teori Dasar Nahwu dan Sharf Tingkat Lanjut. Jember: Pustaka Al-Bidayah

Haris, Abdul. 2022. Teori Dasar Nahwu dan Sharf Tingkat Pemula. Jember: Pustaka Al-Bidayah.

Hefner, Robert. 2008. “Introduction: The Politics and Cultures of Islamic Education in Southeast Asia”, In Making Modern Muslims. Hawai: University of Hawai Press.

Hussain, Khuram. 2007. “An Islamic Consideration of Western Moral Education: An Exploration of the Individual.” Journal of Moral Education 36 (3): 297–308. doi:10.1080/03057240701552802.

Imamah, Yuli habibatul. 2024. “The Concept of Modern-Contextual Islamic Education According to Haji Rasul”. At-Ta’dib 18 (2):71-92. https://doi.org/10.21111/attadib.v18i2.10799.

Inglehart, R. 1990. Culture Shift and Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: NJ Princeton University Press.

Lukens-Bull, R., Woodward, M. 2021. Variation of Muslim Practice in Indonesia. In: Lukens-Bull, R., Woodward, M. (eds) Handbook of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Lives. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32626-5_78

Lukens-Bull, Ronald. 2005. A Peaceful Jihad: Negotiating Identity and Modernity in Muslim Java. London: Springer.

Madjid, Nurcholish. 1987. Bilik-Bilik Pesantren. Jakarta: Paramadina.

Moleong, Lexy J, Qualitative Research Methodology (Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2010).

Mudzhar, M. Atho. 2000. “Kedudukan IAIN Sebagai Perguruan Tinggi”, in Problem dan Prospek IAIN, Ed: Komaruddin Hidayat & Hendro Prasetyo. Jakarta: Ditbinpertais.

Mutahir, Arizal. 2011. Intelektual Kolektif Pierre Bourdieu. Bantul: Kreasi Wacana.

Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. 1987. Traditional Islam in the Modern World. London: KPI.

Nasution, S., Research Method (Scientific Research), (Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2011)

Nilan, Pam. 2009. “The ‘Spirit of Education’ in Indonesian Pesantren.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 30 (2): 219–32. doi:10.1080/01425690802700321.

Nur’aeni, Z. 2005. “Darut Tauhid: Modernizing a Pesantren Tradition”, Studia Islamika 12(3): 475-513. doi: 10.15408/sdi.v12i3.583

Priyono, B. Herry. 2022. Anthony Giddens: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: KPG.

Rahman, Fazlur. 2015. “Internet and Kiais in Indonesia: Negotiation of Authority in a Mediatized Environment”, Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet. Vol. 9.

Roqib, M. 2021. Increasing Social Class through Islamic Boarding Schools in Indonesia. Journal of Social Studies Education Research. 12(2).

Steenbrink, Karel. A. 1974. Pesantren, Madrasah, Sekolah: Pendidikan Islam dalam Kurun Modern. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Wiranata, Anom. Tt. Perubahan Sosial Dalam Perspektif Pierre Bourdieu. Bali: Universitas Udayana.

Zulmuqim, Z. (2017). The Existence of Pesantren, Kiai and Kitab Kuning learning as the Main Element of Islamic Education in Indonesia. Khalifa: Journal of Islamic Education, 1(2), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.24036/kjie.v1i2.9

Downloads

Published

2024-12-25

How to Cite

Muchlish Huda, M., & Muslih, M. (2024). The Instant Mastery of Kitab Kuning with the Al-Bidayah Method: Between Kiai Fractured Authority and Pesantren Tradition Preservation. At-Ta’dib, 19(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.21111/attadib.v19i2.11795