Comparison Analysis of Financial Performance of BUMN and Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks with RGEC Method

Authors

  • Hafiz Santak Taram Universitas Islam "45" Bekasi
  • Isfandayani Isfandayani Universitas Islam “45” Bekasi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/tijarah.v8i2.7301

Keywords:

Financial Performance, Islamic Banks, RGEC

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the comparison of the financial performance of BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks and Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks on the variables of Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital (RGEC) for the 2017-2020 period represented by the ratio of NPF, FDR, BOPO, GCG, ROA, ROE, and CAR. The results of this research show that of the 7 ratios analyzed, there are 5 ratios with significant differences between the financial performance of BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks and Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks during the 2017-2020 period, namely FDR, BOPO, GCG, ROA, and ROE. While the NPF ratio, CAR, and RGEC Composite Rating there is no significant difference between the financial performance of BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks and Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks during the 2017-2020 period. The last analysis on the consolidated financial performance assessment of all RGEC variables shows that the performance of BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks is not better than the performance of Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks where the average composite value for 4 years is the performance of BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks (80%), smaller than the composite value of the performance of Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks (86%).

Author Biography

Hafiz Santak Taram, Universitas Islam "45" Bekasi

Departmen of  Economics

References

Amelia, R. (2019) ‘Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum Bumn Konvensional Dan Bank Umum Bumn Syariah’, 5(1), pp. 63–72.Ascarya and Yumanita, D. (2005) Bank Syariah : Gambaran Umum. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia.Badruzaman, J. and Kusmayadi, D. (2016) ‘Good Corporate Governance’, jurnal ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 11(1), pp. 1–31. Available at: www.pnm.co.id.Bank Indonesia (2006) ‘Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 8/4/PBI/2006 tentang Pelaksanaan Good Corporate Governance’, Pelaksanaan Good Corporate Governance bagi Bank Umum, pp. 1–30.Bank Indonesia (2007) ‘Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor:9/1/PBI/2007 Tentang Sistem Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum Berdasarkan Prinsip Syariah.’Bank Indonesia (2011) ‘Peraturan Bank Indonesia No.13/1/PBI/2011 Tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum’, Peraturan Bank Indonesia, pp. 1–31.Dachlevie, R., Suriawinata, I. and Anhar, M. (2020) ‘Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Persero Dengan Metode RGEC Tahun 2018’, Jurnal Magister Akuntansi, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia, 1, pp. 1–21.Daniswara, F. D. and Sumarta, N. H. (2016) ‘Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Berdasarkan Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital (Rgec) Pada Bank Umum Konvensional Dan Bank Umum Syariah Periode 2011-2014’, Gema, 30(51), pp. 2344–2360.Departemen Agama RI (2007) ‘Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahannya Al-Jumanatul'ali.’Fitriana, N., Rosyid, A. and Fakhrina, A. (2015) ‘Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Syariah Dan Konvensional Dengan Menggunakan Metode Rgec ( Risk Profile , Good Corporate Governance , Earnings , Dan Capital )’, jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 17(2), pp. 1–12. Available at: https://jurnal.unikal.ac.id/index.php/jebi/article/view/332.Hendriyani, R. et al. (2017) ‘Metodologi Penelitian Ekonomi dan Bisnis’, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, 1(Metodologi Penelitian), pp. 1–86.Hertinsyana, D. (2019) ‘Perbedaan Kinerja Bank Umum (Studi di Bank Umum Pemerintah dan Swasta Nasional)’, Journal of Business Economics, 24(2), pp. 181–192. doi: 10.35760/eb.2019.v24i2.1908.Ikatan Bankir Indonesia (2014) Mengelola Bank Syariah. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.Islamiyati, D. and Anwar, M. K. (2018) ‘Melaksanakan penilaian sendiri (self assessment) merupakan kewajiban seluruh bank, penilaian kesehatan bank terus mengalamai penyempurnaan dan pada penelitian ini menggunakan metode RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning, Capital), penilai’, 1, pp. 183–194.Ismanto, D. and Laksono, D. K. A. (2020) ‘Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan pada Bank Umum Syariah Bumn (Bank BRI Syariah, Bank Syariah Mandiri dan Bank BNI Syariah)’, 2(2), pp. 99–114.Madyawati, U. R. N. (2018) ‘Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Bank Syariah Dan Bank Konvensional Di Indonesia.’Mangindaan, J., Supit, T. and Tampi, J. (2019) ‘Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank Bumn Dan Bank Swasta Nasional Yang Terdaftar Pada Bursa Efek Indonesia’, Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 7(3), pp. 3398–3407. doi: 10.35794/emba.v7i3.24420.OJK (2020) ‘SPS Perbankan Syariah 2020’, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.‘Undang-Undang No. 19 Tentang Badan Usaha Milik Negara’ (2003), p. 32.Undang-Undang No. 21 Tentang Perbankan Syariah (2008).Yasinta, F. and Handayani, N. (2019) ‘Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank Syariah Dengan Pendekatan Risk Profile, GCG, Earnings Dan Capital’, Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi, 8. Available at: http://jurnalmahasiswa.stiesia.ac.id/index.php/jira/article/view/241.Yunika, Z., Suhadak and Topowijono (2017) ‘Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Menggunakan RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings and Capital) Sebagai Metode untuk Mengukur Tingkat Kesehatan Bank (Studi pada Perusahaan Perbankan yang Terdaftar di BEI Periode 2011-2016)’, Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB) Universitas Brawijaya, 50(6), pp. 106–111.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-26

How to Cite

Taram, H. S., & Isfandayani, I. (2023). Comparison Analysis of Financial Performance of BUMN and Non BUMN Islamic Commercial Banks with RGEC Method. Al Tijarah, 8(2), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.21111/tijarah.v8i2.7301