Classical Insights, Contemporary Relevance: Understanding Tafsīr bi-al-Maʾthūr in Qurʾānic Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21111/studiaquranika.v9i2.12989Keywords:
Abstract
This paper explores tafsīr bi-al-maʾthūr, or tradition-based Qurʾānic exegesis, examining its core elements, interpretive diversity, and relevance in both historical and contemporary contexts. Defined by reliance on the Qurʾān itself, prophetic traditions, and the interpretations of the Companions and Successors, tafsīr bi-al-maʾthūr is foundational in Islamic scholarship for preserving original meanings of the Qurʾān. However, its dependence on early sources raises questions about its adaptability to current ethical, legal, and social issues within Muslim communities. Through a qualitative analysis, this study investigates primary interpretative methods within tafsīr bi-al-maʾthūr, including tafsīr al-Qurʾān bi-l-Qurʾān, tafsīr bi-l-ḥadīth, and interpretations by the Companions and Successors. The paper reveals how tafsīr bi-al-maʾthūr maintains Qurʾānic authenticity while offering insights into its potential relevance for contemporary applications. This study contributes to Qurʾānic studies by affirming tafsīr bi-al-maʾthūr as both a resilient and adaptable approach, balancing fidelity to foundational texts with interpretive flexibility in modern Islamic discourse.References
Abduh, Mohammed. Tafsir Al-Qur’an al-Karim: Tafsir al-Manar. oj, 1947.
Abū Ḥayyān. Al- Baḥr al-Muḥīṭ Fi al-Tafsīr. Vol. 1. Cairo: Maṭbʿa al- Sʿādah, 1328.
Al- Ṭusī, Abū Jʿafar. Al- Tibyān Fī Tafsīr al -Qurʾān. Nazaf: Al- Maṭbʿa al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1958.
Albayrak, İsmail. Klâsik Modernizmde Kur’ân’a Yaklaşımlar. Ensar neşriyat, 2004.
Albayrak, Ismail. “Qur’anic Narrative and Isra’iliyyat in Western Scholarship and in Classical Exegesis.” Phd, University of Leeds, 2000. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/507/.
Ali, Amer Zulfiqar. “A Brief Review of Classical and Modern Tafsir Trends and Role of Modern Tafasir in Contemporary Islamic Thought.” Australian Journal of Islamic Studies 3, no. 2 (November 14, 2018): 39–52. https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v3i2.87.
Al-Qaṭṭān, Mannāʿ. Mabāḥith Fī Al-ʿulūm al-Qurʾān. Riyad, Saudi: Maktabat al-Maʿārif, 2000.
Al-Ṭabarī, Abū Jaʿfar Muḥammad ibn Jarīr. Jāmiʿ Al-Bayān ʿan Taʾwīl Āy al-Qurʾān. Edited by MaÎmÙd Muḥammad and Aḥmad Muḥammad Shākir. Vol. I. Cairo: Dār al-Maʿārif, n.d.
Baljon, Johannes Marinus Simon. Modern Muslim Koran Interpretation:(1880-1960). Brill Archive, 1961.
Berg, Herbert. The Development of Exegesis in Early Islam: The Authenticity of Muslim Literature from the Formative Period. Routledge, 2013.
Biesterfeldt, Hinrich. “Review of John Wansbrough, Quranic Studies. Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation, Oxford 1977.” In Kleine Schriften by Josef van Ess (3 Vols), 1725–35. Brill, 2018.
Bushra, Mariam, and Shahzadi Pakeeza. “The Rise of Neo-Modernism and Contextual Approach to Qurʼānic Interpretation by Neo-Modernist Scholars.” Majallah-e-Talim o Tahqiq 4, no. 3 (September 30, 2022): 50–67. https://ojs.cer.edu.pk/index.php/mtt/article/view/252.
Coruh, Hakan. “Tradition, Reason, and Qur’anic Exegesis in the Modern Period: The Hermeneutics of Said Nursi.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 28, no. 1 (2017): 85–104.
Demirci, Muhsin, and Tefsir Tarihi. “İFAV Yay,” 2003.
Denffer, Ahmad Von. Ulum al Qur’an: An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an (Koran). Kube Publishing Ltd, 2015.
Dhahabiī, Ḥussain. Al-Tafsīr Wa al- Mufassirūn. Vol. 1. Cairo: Dār al -kutub al Ḥadīth, 1961.
Dogan, Recep. Usul al Tafsir: The Sciences and Methodology of the Qur’an. Tughra Books, 2014.
Faraz, Muhammad Samiullah, and Syeda Asiya. “Impact of the Contextual Approach on the Qur’ānic Interpretations: An Analytical Study.” Jihat Ul Islam 14, no. 1 (2020): 1–20.
Goldziher, Ignaz. Introduction to Islamic Theology and Law. Princeton University Press, 1981.
Ḥussain, ʿAlī al- Ṣagīr. Al- Mabādiʾ al-ʿāmma Li Tafsīr al- Qurʾān. Bayrūt: Dār al- Muʾarrikh al- ʿArabī, 2000.
Ibn Manẓūr. Lisān Al-ʿArab. Vol. V. Bayrūt: Dār Ṣādir, 1955.
Ibn Saʿd. Al-Ṭabaqāt al-Kubrā. Vol. II. 8. Bayrūt: Dār Ṣādir, 1957.
Ibn Taymiyyah. Majmūʿat Al-Rasāʾil Wal-Masāʾil. Vol. XIII. Bayrūt: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1983.
———. Muqaddimah Fī ʾUṣul Al-Tafsīr, Ed. Adnan Zarzour. 2nd ed. Bayrūt, 1392.
Jansen, Johannes JG. The Interpretation of the Koran in Modern Egypt. Brill Archive, 1980.
Lane, Edward William. Lexicon, Arabic–English. Vol. 1. New York: Ungar Pub. Co, 1955.
———. Lexicon,Arabic–English. Vol. IV. New York: Ungar Pub. Co, 1955.
Māturīdī, Abū Manṣūr al-. Tʾawīlāt ʾAhl Al-Sunna,. Iraq: Wajāra al ʾawqāf, 1404.
Maʿrifat, Muḥammad Hādī. Al-Tafsīr Wa-al-Mufassirūn Fī Thawbihi al-Qashīb. Vol. II. Mashhad: al-Jāmiʿah al-Raḍwiyyah li al-ʿUlūm al-Islāmiyyah, 1997.
McAuliffe, Jane Dammen. “Interpretation of the Qur’ân.” With Reverence for the Word: Medieval Scriptural Exegesis in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, 2003, 311.
McAuliffe, Jane Dammen 1944-. Qurʼānic Christians: An Analysis of Classical and Modern Exegesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Monnot, Guy. “Jane DAMMEN MCAULIFFE, Qur’ānic Christians. An Analysis of Classical and Modern Exegesis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991, 23, 5 x 16 Cm., XII+ 340 Pp.” Arabica 39, no. 3 (1992): 404–5.
Muḥammad al-Khuāarī. Tārīkh Al-Tashrī. Bayrūt: Dār al-Fikr al-ʿArabī, 1992.
Nursi, Badiuzzaman Said al-. “The Letters: Epistles on Islamic Thought, Belief and Life.” Terj. Huseyin Akarsu). New Jersey: The Light Inc, 2007.
Nursi, Said. Signs of Miraculousness: The Inimitability of the Qur’an’s Conciseness. Barla Publications, 2015.
PAÇACI, Mehmet. “Klasik Tefsir Neydi?” İslâmî İlimler Dergisi 1, no. 3 (2007): 7–20.
Paçacı, Mehmet. Çağdaş Dönemde Kur’an’a ve Tefsire Ne Oldu? Klasik, 2008.
Pakeeza, Dr Shahzadi, and Mariam Bushra. “The Idea of Context and Contextual Qur’anic Interpretation.” Al-Qanṭara 8, no. 4 (December 30, 2022): 222–35. http://alqantarajournal.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/185.
Philips, Abu Ameenah Bilal. Usool At-Tafseer: The Methodology of Qur’anic Interpretation. International Islamic Publishing House, 2005.
Qadhi, Yasir. An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’aan. Al-Hidaayah Publishing and Distribution, 1999.
Rippin, Andrew. “Interpreting the Bible through the Qur’ān.” In Approaches to the Qur’an, 249–59. Routledge, 2005.
Sābūnī, Muḥammad ‘Alī. Al- Tibyān Fī ʿulūm al-Qurʾān. Bayrūt: ʿAlam al-kutub, 1995., 1995.
———. Al-Tibyān f ī ‘Ulūm al-Qur’Ān. Pakistan: Al-Bushra Publishers, 2011.
Saeed, Abdullah. Interpreting the Qurʾan: Towards a Contemporary Approach. Reprinted. London: Routledge, 2006.
Siregar, Ferry. “EXPLORING METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF LINGUISTIC IN THE QURAN AND ITS TAFSIR.” RELIGIA 15 (October 3, 2017). https://doi.org/10.28918/religia.v15i1.119.
Stewart, Devin. “FARID ESACK, The Quran: A Short Introduction (Oxford: Oneworld, 2002). Pp. 192. $15.95 Paper.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 36, no. 4 (2004): 682–84.
Suyūtī, Jalāl al- dīn. Al-ʾItqān Fī ʿulūm al -Qurʾān. Karachi: Darul ʾIshāʿat, 2008.
Suyūtī, Jalāl al- dīn Al. Al-ʾItqān Fī ʿulūm al -Qurʾān. Muḥammad Abu al-Faḍl Ibrāhīm. Vol. IV. 4 vols. Cairo, 1967.
Troudi, Khaled. “Qurʾanic Hermeneutics with Reference to Narratives: A Study in Classical Exegetical Traditions,” 2011.
Von Denffer, Ahmad. ʻUlūm Al-Qurʼān: An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qurʼān. Nigeria: Islamic Foundation, 2011.
Zarkashī. Al-Burhān Fī al-ʿulūm al-Qurʾān. Vol. II. Bayrūt: Dār al-Fikr, 1988.
Zubaydī, Murtaḍā al-. Tāj al ʿarus Min Jawāhir Al-Qāmūs. Vol. III. Bayrūt: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2006.
Zurqānī. Manāhil al ʿIrfān Fī Al- ʿUlūm al -Qurʾān. Vol. I. Bayrūt: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1988.
———. Manāhil al ʿirfān Fī Al- ʿulūm al -Qurʾān. Vol. II. Cairo: Dār al- Ḥadīth, 2001.
ʾArthar Jafrī. Muqaddamatān Fī Al- ʿulūm al -Qurʾān. Bagdād: Maṭbʿa al- Sunna al- Muḥammadiyya, 1954.
ʿAsqalānī, Ibn Ḥajar al-. Fatḥ Al-Bārī, Sharḥ ‚ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Vol. I. Bayrūt: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1997.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Studia Quranika: Jurnal Studi Quran

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.