Analysis of Amnesty International Success in Enforcing Human Rights in Deep South

Penulis

  • reza adam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/mediasi.v1i1.2271

Abstrak

This study aims to understand the reasons why Amnesty International succeeded in enforcing human rights in the Deep South of Thailand's conflict. The Deep South conflict of Thailand has its roots in historic problems, since the annexation of the Patani Kingdom by the Siamese kingdom, which is now Thailand's state. Conflict which initially emerged as inter-ethnic conflict of Malay and Thai slowly transitioned into inter-Religion, Islam and Buddhism. The Deep South community as a Muslim identity feels discrimination by the Thai government as a Buddhist identity. On this issue, the Deep South people made a resistance movement to defend them against discrimination. The Thai government regards the movement as a separatist movement that means rebellion. To stem the resistance, the Thai government, then, formulated a series of laws that facilitate its tools to commit human rights abuses such as torture and detention, when the Deep South community as a local people has no access or influence to the Thai authorities. In view of these conditions, Amnesty International as an International Human Rights organization makes a successful effort to enforce human rights in the conflict. Using the Transnational Advocacy Network concept, this study explains the successes of Amnesty International. The approach used is Leverage Politics and Accountability Politics to be able to understand the successes made by Amnesty International. Both approaches are used in analyzing the success of Amnesty International in forming advocacy networks, influencing powerful actors, and pressuring the Thai government through advocacy networks. This research applies Qualitative Method, with data collection through Library Research. In this study it will also be discussed slightly about the Islamic Worldview of human rights. The researcher hoped that both state and non-state actors can understand the success of Amnesty International's role, similar steps in international dynamics, and be a reference for academics to develop this research.

Referensi

Abdulmani, L. (2013, January-June). Conflict Resolution: Case Study of the Separatist Movement in the Southern Border Provinces of Thailand. Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies (QIJS), 1(1), 4 - 5.

Boonpunth, K. C. (2016, August). Peace Survey- a Tool for Peace Building in the Deep South of Thailand. International Journal of Management and Applied Sciences, 2(8), 102.

Burke, A., Tweedie, & Poocharoen, O.-o. (2013). The COntested Corners of Asia: Subnational Conflict and International Development Assistance: The Case of Southern Thailand. USA, San Fransisco: The Asia Foundation.

Haberkorn, T. (2014, October 02). Martial Law and the Criminalization of Thought in Thailand. The Asia-Pasific Journal,, 12(40), 5.

Harding, A. (n.d.). Thailand's Reforms: Human Rights and the National Commission. Journal of Comparative Law, 90.

https://www.amnesty.org/en/who-we-are/. (2017, November 26). Retrieved from https://www.amnesty.org: https://www.amnesty.org/en/who-we-are/

Index, T. E. (2018). infographics.economist.com. Retrieved from https://infographics.economist.com/2018/DemocracyIndex/.

International, A. (2014). Submission to the United Nations Committee Against Torture. London: Peter Benenson House.

International, A. (2016). Make Him Speak by TOmmorow: Torture and All Other Ill-Treatment in Thailand. London, UK: Amnesty International.

International, A. (2017). Global Finance Report 2016. 1 Easton Street, London: Peter Benenson House.

International, A. (2017). Submission to the United Nations HUman RIghts Committee. London: Peter Benenson House.

Keck, M. E., & Siikink, K. (1998). Activist Beyond Borders Advocacy Networks in International Politics. London: Cornell University Press.

Muladi, H. (2009). Hak Asasi Manusia: Hakekat, Konsep dan Implikasi Dalam Perspektif Hukum dan Masyarakat. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Oxford Bibliographies

Patton, M. Q., & Cochran, M. (2007). A Guide to Using Qualitative Research Methodology. pp. 4-5.

Pawakapan, P. (2015, September 3). Thai Junta Militarizes the Management of Natural Resources. Institute for Southeast Asian Studies, 2.

Rights, T. L. (2015, 02 02). Martial Law and the Military Court Civil and Politics Rights in Thailand.

Statement, A. I. (2017). Thailand: Treaty Ratification Must be Followes by Domestic Action to Combat Enforced Disappearances. London: Peter Benenson House.

##submission.downloads##

Telah diserahkan

2018-07-07

Diterima

2018-07-07

Diterbitkan

2018-07-07