Perbandingan Sensitivitas Metode SAW Dan TOPSIS Dalam Pemilihan Ustadz Teladan Ponpes Wahid Hasyim Yogyakarta

Authors

  • Dea Nur Nafi'
  • Agus Mulyanto UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Muhammad Galih Wonoseto UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/fij.v6i1.4670

Keywords:

sensitivity analysis, SAW, TOPSIS, ustadz model

Abstract

AbstrakUntuk menjadi ustadz yang teladan harus memiliki seperangkat kompetensi. Hal ini mengakibatkan pihak dari Pondok Pesantren Wahid Hasyim kesulitan untuk menemukan kandidat ustadz teladan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan analisis perbandingan pada metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan Technique for Others Reference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) dalam pemilihan ustadz teladan pada Pondok Pesantren Wahid Hasyim Yogyakarta. Analisis yang digunakan dalam perbandingan dua metode ini adalah analisis sensitivitas. Analisis sesitivitas dilakukan pada 10 kali percobaan dengan menaikan bobot kriteria yang berbeda. Hasil proses analisis sensitivitas dalam penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa metode TOPSIS memiliki kecenderungan nilai presentase sensitifitas yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan metode SAW. Pada metode TOPSIS menghasilkan perubahan rangking sebanyak 27.002 dan presentase perubahan rangking sebesar 41.613%. Sedangkan metode SAW memiliki perubahan rangking sebanyak 19.003 dan presentase perubahan rangking sebesar 32.062%. Sehingga pengambilan keputusan yang relevan dalam pemilihan ustadz teladan pada Pondok Pesantren Wahid Hasyim Yogyakarta dapat dilakukan dengan Metode TOPSIS.Kata kunci: Analisis Sensitivitas, SAW, TOPSIS, Ustadz Teladan Abstract[A Comparison Analysis of Sensitivity Using SAW and TOPSIS Method in The Election of Ustadz Model in The Muslim Boarding School Wahid Hasyim] To be an exemplary religious teacher, he must have the competency to be appointed. Wahid Hasyim Islamic Boarding School is having trouble finding exemplary religious teacher candidates. This study aims to analyze the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method and Techniques for Others Reference to Similarities with Ideal Solutions (TOPSIS) in the selection of exemplary religious teachers at Wahid Hasyim Islamic Boarding School in Yogyakarta. The analysis used in the comparison of these two methods is sensitivity analysis. The sensitivity analysis was carried out on 10 trials by raising the weight of different criteria. The sensitivity analysis method in this study shows that the TOPSIS method has a higher sensitivity value than the SAW method. The TOPSIS method produces a change in rank of 27,002 and the percentage change in rank of 41,613%. While the SAW method has a ranking change of 19,003 and the percentage change in rank of 32,062%. Related to relevant decision-makers in the selection of exemplary teachers at Wahid Hasyim Islamic Boarding School in Yogyakarta can be done with the TOPSIS Method.Keywords: Sensitivity Analysis, SAW, TOPSIS, Ustadz Model

References

[1] HWANG, C.L., and YOON, K. 1981. Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Aplication : A State-of-the-Art Survey. New York : Springer-Verlag[2] Zeleny, M. 1982. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. New York : McGraw Hill[3] Dwihastadi, A., dkk., 2020. Prototipe Aplikasi Mobile Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Destinasi Wisata di Yogyakarta. Jurnal DISPROTEK. 11(2). 59-66. Tersedia pada: https://ejournal.unisnu.ac.id/JDPT/article/view/1258/pdf[4] Yusnaeni, W. dan Ningsih, R. 2019. Analisis Perbandingan Metode TOPSIS, SAW dan WP Melalui Uji Sensitifitas Supplier Terbaik. Jurnal Informatika. 6(1). 2355-6579. Tersedia pada: https://repository.bsi.ac.id/index.php/unduh/item/238077/4399-15302-2-PB_informatika.pdf[5] Desi, R.S., Agus, P. W., Dedy, H., dan Solikhun. 2018. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Rekomendasi Kelulusan Sidang Skripsi Menggunakan Metode AHP-TOPSIS. Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Komputer. 6(1). 1-6. Tersedia pada: https://www.jtsiskom.undip.ac.id/index.php/jtsiskom/article/view/12949[6] Suyanti dan Roestam, R. 2018. Analisis Perbandingan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS Dalam Pemilihan Guru Teladan Pada SMA N 4 Sorolangun. Jurnal Manajemen Sistem Informasi. 3(3). 1208-1255. Tersedia pada: http://ejournal.stikom-db.ac.id/index.php/manajemensisteminformasi/article/download/489/357[7] Sunarti. 2018. Perbandingan Metode TOPSIS dan SAW Untuk Pemilihan Rumah Tinggal. JOINS (Journal of Information System). 3(1). 69-79. Tersedia pada: http://publikasi.dinus.ac.id/index.php/joins/article/view/1883/1289[8] Susi, H. 2017. Analisis Perbandingan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Calon Dosen STMIK Palangkaraya. SAINTEKOM. 7(2). 126-137. Tersedia pada: http://stmikplk.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/saintekom/article/view/28/23[9] Sobirin, M. 2013. Sistem Rekomendasi Pemilihan Hotel di Yogyakarta Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS pada Smartphone Android. Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.[10] Fauzi, A.A., Zahro', H. Z., Prasetya, R. P. 2020. Analisis Perbandingan Metode TOPSIS dan SAW dalam Penentuan Prioritas Perbaikan Jalan di Kabupaten Rembang. JATI (Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika). 4(2). 29-36. Tersedia pada: https://ejournal.itn.ac.id/index.php/jati/article/view/2676/2300 [11] Sudipa, I. G. I., Puspitayani, I. A. D., 2019. Analisis Sensitivitas AHP-SAW dan ROC-SAW dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Multikriteria. International Journal of Natural Science & Engineering (IJNSE). 3(2). 87-95. Tersedia pada: https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/IJNSE/article/view/22229/13879[12] Kusumadewi, S. et al. (2006) Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (FUZZY MADM). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.[13] Yeh, C.-H. (2002) “A Problem-based Selection of Multi-attribute Decision-making Methods.,” Research, Internstional Transaction in Operasional, 9. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-3995.00348

Downloads

Submitted

2020-07-25

Accepted

2021-02-06

Published

2021-02-06

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): Mei

Section

Articles

License

Please find the rights and licenses in the Fountain of Informatics Journal (FIJ). By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.

1. License

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 

2. Author(s)' Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author, and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User/Public Rights

FIJ's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, FIJ permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and FIJ on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published. 

4. Rights of Authors

Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;

  • Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
  • The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
  • The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
  • The right to self-archive the article (please read out deposit policy),
  • The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri).

5. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. FIJ will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. FIJ will only communicate with the corresponding author.

6. Royalties

Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that FIJ entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees. 

7. Miscellaneous

FIJ will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. FIJ's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.