Konsep Filsafat Retorika Dalam Debat Keagamaan Zakir Naik: Studi Analisis Filsafat Retorika Aristoteles

Authors

  • Asep Saepulah Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v18i2.4874

Keywords:

Zakir Naik, Philosophy, Rhetoric, Ethos, Phatos, Logos

Abstract

In the development of the history of philosophy, both in the West and in the East, Philosophy is not only understood as a tool for thinking alone, but philosophy has become a tool for arguing by compiling a good sentence and delivered it orally which is called the science of rhetoric. Zakir Naik, who is an expert in debating religious discourse, is demanded to be able to rhetoric well. From the results of the study the authors concluded that; First, the philosophy of rhetoric is a part of philosophy that analyzes the composition of a discourse both oral and written which is based on a neatly arranged knowledge in influencing people through the rules of effectiveness and beauty of language. Second, Zakir Naik in rhetoric use the concepts of ethos, pathos, and logos, by paying attention to the beauty of language.

References

Naik, Zakir. et. al. 2014. Mereka Bertanya Islam Menjawab. Solo: AQWAM. Cet. 10.

Naik, Zakir. 2016. Debat Islam vs Non-Islam. Solo: AQWAM.

Naik, Zakir. 2016. Miracles of Al-Qur’an & As-Sunnah. Solo: AQWAM.

Ahmad Hidayat, Asep. 2014. Filsafat Bahasa. Bandung: ROSDA. Cet. 3.

Tafsir, Ahmad. 2013. Filsafat Umum: Akal dan Hati Sejak Thales Sampai Capra. Bandung: ROSDA.

O. Kattsoft, Louis. 1989. Pengantar Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Sumarsono. 2001. Buku Ajar: Filsafat Bahasa. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Alwasilah, A. Chaedar. 2008. Filsafat Bahasa dan Pendidikan. Bandung: ROSDA.

Kaelan. 2013. Pembahasan Filsafat Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Paradigma.

Khoyin, Muhammad. 2013. Filsafat Bahasa: Philosophy of Languange. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Diktat Filsafat bahasa yang ditulis oleh dosen filsafat bahasa Bapak Muzairi

Kaelan. 2005. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif bidang Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Paradigma.

Sofia, Adib. 2012. Metode Penulisan Karya Ilmiah. Yogyakarta: Karya Media.

Sulanjari, Yuni. 2011. Retorika: Seni Bicara Untuk Semua. Yogyakarta: Siasat Pustaka.

Maarif, Zainul. 2015. Retorika: Metode Komunikasi Publik. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Hendrikus, Dori Wuwur. 1991. Retorika: Terampil Berpidato, Berdiskusi, Berargumentasi, Bernegosiasi. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Rakhmat, Jalalluddin. 1998. Retorika Modern: Pendekatan Praktis. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nuryadi, Yahya. 2016. Dr. Zakir Naik. Depok: Mentari Media.

Aizid, Rizem. 2017. Dr. Zakir Naik Mengguncang Dunia.Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

Albi K. et. al. 2016. Dr. Zakir Naik: Dokter yang MengIslamkan Ratusan Ribu Orang. Yogyakarta: Mutiara Media.

K. Bertens. 1999. Sejarah Filsafat Yunani. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Mulyati, Sri. 2006. Tasawuf Nusantara: Rangkaian Mutiara Sufi Terkemuka. Jakarta: Kencana.

Downloads

How to Cite

Saepulah, A. (2020). Konsep Filsafat Retorika Dalam Debat Keagamaan Zakir Naik: Studi Analisis Filsafat Retorika Aristoteles. Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam, 18(2), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v18i2.4874

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

The author whose published manuscript approved the following provisions:

  1. The right of publication of all material published in the journal / published in the Kalimah is held by the editorial board with the knowledge of the author (moral rights remain the author of the script).
  2. The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which means that Kalimah reserves the right to save, transmit media or format, Database), maintain, and publish articles without requesting permission from the Author as long as it keeps the Author's name as the owner of Copyright.
  3. Printed and electronic published manuscripts are open access for educational, research and library purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.