Kritik Nalar Hermeneutika Paul Ricoeur

Daden Robi Rahman

Abstract

Hermeneutics was born and developed in the West, specifically in response to the theological problem of Christianity, and always claimed to be an effective solution to the interpretation of Scripture. With existence of various schools, hermeneutics has also various shades and resulted different interpretations. Such as Schleiermacher, followed by Wilhelm Dilthey and Emilio Betti as initiators of hermeneutics methodology. Martin Heidegger and Gadamer followed with their ontological hermeneutics, and continued by Habermas with his critical hermeneutics. After that, the critical ontological hermeneutics initiated by either Paul Ricoeur, or Rudolf Bultman with his theological hermeneutics, and Derrida with his deconstructive hermeneutics. Among those schools, the writers interested in reviewing the hermeneutics of Paul Ricoeur which represents a distinctive theory of interpretation. His idea considered to be a bridge of the fierce debate between methodological traditions and philosophical traditions represented by Emilio Betti and Hans Georg Gadamer. The thought of Ricoeur was also claimed as a mediator between the positions of the romantic tradition of Schleiermacher and Dilthey with philosophy hermeneutic by Martin Heidegger. In another side, he was placed as a combination between the two great philosophical tradition, that’s German phenomenology and France structuralism. Furthermore, the thought of Ricoeur is a revision to the thought of Dilthey about explanation (erklären) and understanding (verstehen). Through this paper, the writer will attempt to unravel the thought of Paul Ricoeur, and in the end, will clearly known the position of Ricoeur among other hermeneutics initiators.

Keywords

Hermeneutic; Paul Ricoeur; Interpretation; Phenomenology; Structuralism; Ontological; Methodological

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 483 times
PDF - 152 times

References

Armas, Adnin. 2005. Metodologi Bibel dalam Studi al-Qur’an. Jakarta: GIP. Cet. I.‎

Bertens, Kees. 2001. Filsafat Barat Kontemporer Prancis. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.‎

Bleicher, Joseph. 1980. Contemporary Hermeneutics, Hermeneutics as Method, ‎Philosophy, and Critique. London: Rutledge & Keagan Paul.‎

Burhanuddin, Mamat S. 2006. Hermeneutika al-Qur'an ala Pesantren. Yogyakarta: UII ‎Press. ‎

Faiz, Fakhruddin. 2003. Hermeneutika Qur'ani: antara Teks, Konteks, dan ‎Kontekstualisasi. Yogyakarta: al-Qalam.‎

Gadamer, Hans Georg. 1976. Philosophical Hermeneutics. Terj & Ed. David E. Linge. ‎California: University of California Press.‎

Hardiman, Budi. 2003. Melampaui Positivisme dan Modernisme. Yogyakarta: Penerbit ‎Kanisius.‎

Nasr, Sayyed Hoessein. 1967. Islamic Studies: Essay on Law and Society, the Science, ‎and Philosophy and Sufisme. Beirut: Librairie Du Liban.‎

Palmer, Richard E. 1969. Hermeneutics; Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, ‎Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.‎

Rahardjo, Mudjia. 2008. Dasar-dasar Hermeneutika antara Intensionalisme dan ‎Gadamerian. Yogyakarta: al-Russ Media Group.‎

Ricoeur, Paul. 1982. Hermeneutics and Human Sciences, Essay on Language, Action ‎and Interpretation. Terj. & editor John B. Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge ‎University Press. ‎

‎____________. 2005. Theory of Interpretation: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. ‎Terj. Musnur Heri. “Filsafat Wacana: Membedah Makna dalam Anatomi ‎Bahasa.” Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.‎

Sumaryono, E. 1999. Hermeneutik Sebuah Metode Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.‎

Weinsheimer, Joel C. 1985. Gadamer Hermeneutics: a Reading of Truth and Methode. ‎New Haven: Yale University.‎

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.