Kritik Pandangan G.H.A. Juynboll terhadap Ilmu al-Jarh wa al-Ta’dil

Authors

  • Arif Chasanul Muna Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri (STAIN) Pekalongan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v14i1.359

Keywords:

al-jarḥ wa al-ta‘dīl, Narrator of Hadith (al-rāwi), Sanad, Regionalism, Ṣāliḥ, Ahl ḥadīts, Orientalist

Abstract

The orientalist assumed that the method of ahl ḥadīts is only focused on the sanad analysis. Beyond that, they also give a critic of the sanad analysis methods and assume that is problematic. Among orientalists who discuss sanad is G.H.A. Juynboll. Besides, he agreed with his predecessors about the uncomprehensiveness method of ahl ḥadīts, Juynboll also argued that the aforementioned sanad analysis method. According to him, the science of al-jarḥ wa al-ta’dīl -which is the most important aspect in sanad analysis was deeply problematic, the reason can be traced from two sides; the first, the narrators (al-rāwi) assessment standards are not objective. The fact is, more assessments are based on the opposite (regionalism); it’s mean that in the early days of the hadith narration there were conflicts between one region to anothers, so that the narrators of the region refused to narrate from another regions. For example, the conflicts occurred between the narrators of Medina and Iraq or between Iraq and Syria. Secondly, a lot the terms have evolved over time, thus there occured various meanings among them. Therefore, through this article the writer will try to criticize this opinion and examine the level of Juynboll understanding to the methods of ahl ḥadīts analysis, especially on the issue of al-jarḥ wa al-ta‘dīl. Afterward, seeing to what extent the actual accuracy of the criticism is given by orientalist (in this case Juynboll) to the method of ahl ḥadīts.

References

Al-‘Asqalani, Syihab al-Din Ahmad bin Ali bin Hajar. 1995. Tahdzi>b al-Tahdzi>b. Beirut: ‎Dar al-Fikr.‎

Al-Barr, Abu Amr Yusuf bin Abd. 1996. Ja>mi’ Baya>n al-‘Ilm wa Fad}lih. Jil. 2. Saudi ‎Arabia: Da>r Ibnu al-Jawzi>.‎

Al-Dzahabi, Syams al-Din Muhammad bin Ahmad bin Usman. 1985. Siyar A‘la>m al-‎Nubala>’. Jil. 23. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risa>lah.‎

Al-Fadhl, Ahmad bin Ali bin Hajar al-‘Asqalani Syihabuddin. 1997. Tah}ri>r Taqri>b al-‎Tahdzi>b. Jil. 2. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risa>lah.‎‏ ‏

Al-Hanbali, Ibnu Rajab. Abd al-Rahman bin Ahmad. 1978. Syarh} ‘Ilal al-Tirmidzi>. Jil. 2. ‎T.k: Da>r al-Mala>h li al-T{iba>’ah wa al-Nasyr.‎

Al-Jurjani, Abu Ahmad Abdullah bin Adi. 1988. Al-Ka>>mil fi>> D{u‘afa>>’ al-Rija>>l. Jil. 8. . ‎Beirut: Da>r al-Fikr.‎

Al-Majid, Abd al-Majid Mahmud Abd. 1979. Al-Ittija>ha>t al-Fiqhiyyah ‘inda As}h}a>b al-‎H{adi>ts fi> al-Qarn al-Tsa>lits al-Hijri>. Kairo: Maktabah al-Khanji>.‎

Al-Mizzi, al-Hafiz al-Mutqin Jamal al-Din Abi al-Hajjaj Yusuf. 1994. Tahdzi>b al-Kama>l fi> ‎Asma>’ al-Rija>l. Jil. 35. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risa>lah.‎

Al-Razi, Abu Muhammad Abd al-Rahman bin Abi Hatim Muhammad bin Idris bin al-‎Mundzir al-Tamimi al-Hanzali. Kita>b al-Jarh} wa al-Ta‘di>l. Jil. 9. Beirut: Da>r al-‎Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.‎

Al-Umari, Akram Dhiya. 1994. Buh}u>ts fi> Ta>ri>kh al-Sunnah al-Musyarrafah. Madinah: ‎Maktabah al-Ulu>m wa al-H{ikam.‎

Al-Wuraykat, Abd al-Karim. 2000. Al-Waham fi> Riwa>ya>t al-Mukhtalif al-Amsa>r. Riyadh: ‎Adwa>’ al-Salaf.‎

Bakr,‎‏ ‏Umar Ayman Abu. 2001. Al-Ta’si>s fi> Fann Dira>sah al-Asa>ni>d: Dira>sah Ta’si>liyyah ‎Tafs}i>liyyah Sya>milah li al-Jawa>nib al-Naz}ariyyah wa al-Tat}bi>qiyyah. Riyadh: ‎Maktabah al-Ma’a>rif li al-Nasyr wa al-Tawzi>‘.‎

Biqa’i, Ali Nayf. 1998. Al-Ijtiha>d fi> ‘Ilm al-H{adi>ts wa Atsaruhu fi> al-Fiqh al-Isla>mi>. Beirut: ‎Da>r al-Basya>’ir al-Isla>miyya.‎‏ ‏

Crone, Patricia. Cook, Michael. 1977. Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World. ‎Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.‎

Guillaume, Alfred. 1924. The Traditions of Islam: An Introduction to the Study of the ‎Hadis Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.‎

Juynboll, G.H.A. 1983. Muslim Tradition: Studies in Chronology, Provenance and ‎Authorship of Early Hadith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.‎

Lawi, Amin Abu. Ilm Us}u>l al-Jarh} wa al-Ta‘di>l. 1997. Saudi Arabia: Da>r Ibnu ‘Affa>n li al-‎Nasyr wa al-Tawzi>’.‎

Motzki, Harald. 2004. "Hadits: Origins and Developments", dalam Harald Motzki (ed.), ‎The Formation of the Classical Islamic World: Hadits. Aldershot, Hant: ‎Ashgate.‎

Wansbrough, John. 1978. The Sectarian Miliu: Content and Composition of Islamic ‎Salvation History. London Oriental Series, Volume 34. Oxford: Oxford University ‎Press.‎

Downloads

Published

2016-03-31

How to Cite

Muna, A. C. (2016). Kritik Pandangan G.H.A. Juynboll terhadap Ilmu al-Jarh wa al-Ta’dil. Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam, 14(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v14i1.359

Issue

Section

Articles