Dinamika Pengembangan Ilmu di UIN Malang dan UIN Yogyakarta

Authors

  • Mohammad Muslih Universitas Darussalam Gontor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v17i1.2939

Keywords:

Islamic Worldview, Heuristic, Hardcore, Auxiliary Hypothesis, Pseudoscientific.

Abstract

This article intends to look at the latest issues of Philosophy of Science related to the ‎issue of scientific integration, especially those that developes in Islamic State University ‎‎(UIN) Malang and Yogyakarta. In some way, the scientific dynamics of UIN are ‎interesting to study regarding UIN’s success that has been done in building a new ‎scientific paradigm accompanying long-period process of institutional development from ‎Institute to University as its most crucial issue. It is understandable that such a ‎development is a very brilliant stage of scientific achievement recorded in history. The ‎scientific dynamics of UIN also continues to be in a spotlight along with the great ‎expectations -and even a concern- of the community. It is on account that in fact, the ‎development of any scientific paradigm connect or impact broadly on religious ‎understanding of general public. If religion (with all its teachings) is understood as being ‎contrary to science all the time, accordingly, it is impossible for science (with all its ‎characteristics and criteria) to meet with religion. Coming through an advanced scientific ‎paradigm, UIN reconstructs both religious and scientific understanding so that they can ‎meet and even negotiate. Moreover, the two Universities have developed new academic ‎traditions as well, characterized by development patterns in the field of research and ‎scientific works of their academic communities.‎

References

Abdullah, M. Amin. 1992. “Aspek Epistemologis Filsafat Islam,†dalam Irma Fatimah (ed.), Filsafat Islam. Yogyakarta: LESFI.

_____. “Agama, Ilmu dan Budaya: Paradigma Integrasi-Interkoneksi†kuliah inagurasi pengukuhan sebagai Anggota Komisi Kebudayaan pada Akademi Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (AIPI) di UGM Selasa, 3 September 2013.

_____. 1996. Studi Agama, Normativitas atau Historisitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Adonis. 2007. al-Tsabit wa al-Mutahawwil: Bahts fi al-Ibda' wa al-Ittiba' inda al-Arab (Arkeologi Sejarah Pemikiran Arab-Islam). Terj. Khoiron Nahdiyin. Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Ahimsa-Putra, Heddy Shri. “Paradigma, Epistemologi dan Metode Ilmu Sosial-Budaya -Sebuah Pemetaan–“.Makalah, disampaikan dalam pelatihan “Metodologi Penelitianâ€, diselenggarakan oleh CRCS–UGM, di Yogyakarta, 12 Februari – 19 Maret 2007, 8

_____. “Paradigma dan Revolusi Ilmu dalam Antropologi Budaya -Sketsa Beberapa Episode-â€, Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar pada Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Gadjah Mada, diucapkan di depan Rapat Terbuka Majelis Guru Besar Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta, 10 November 2008.

_____. “Paradigma Profetik, Mungkinkah? Perlukah?†Makalah disampaikan dalam Seminar Nasional “Paradigma Profetik: Jalan Baru Ilmu Sosial Keindonesiaanâ€, diselenggarakan oleh Fakultas Ilmu Sosial, UNY, di Yogyakarta, 7 September 2016.

Ahmad, Munawar dan Saptoni (peny.). 2007. Re-Strukturisasi Metodologi Islamic Studies: Mazhab Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Suka Press.

_____. 2013. Lukman Fauroni, Siswanto Masruri, “Rekonstruksi dan Implementasi Metodologi Berparadigma Integrasi-Interkoneksi dalam Studi Islam Kontemporer di Indonesia†(Studi atas Disertasi Doktoral pada 6 UIN), Laporan Penelitian. Jakarta: Kementerian Agama RI Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam.

Assegaf, Abdurraman dan Muh. Isnanto. 2010. “Muatan Keilmuan Integrasi Interkoneksi Dalam Materi Pokok dan Bahan Ajar Matakuliah Keislaman Dosen UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakartaâ€, Laporan Hasil Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Lemlit.

Bagir, Zainal Abidin. 2006. “Sains dan Agama-Agama: Perbandingan Beberapa Tipologi Mutakhir†dalam Zainal Abidin Bagir, Liek Wilardjo, Arqom Kuswanjono, dan Mohammad Yusuf. Ilmu, Etika, & Agama, Menyingkap Tabir Alam dan Manusia. Yogyakarta: CRCS.

Bucaille, Maurice. 1992. Bibel Qur'an dan Sains. Terj. A. Rasyidi. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Budianto, Erik. 2009. Implementasi Integrasi Ilmu di Perguruan Tinggi Islam (Studi Kasus di UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang). Malang: PPS UIN Malang.

Haneef, Mohamed Aslam. 2005. A Critical Survey of Islamization of Knowledge. Kuala Lumpur: Research Centre IIUM.

Hoodbhoy, Pervez. 1996. Ikhtiar Menegakkan Rasionalitas: Antara Sains dan Ortodoksi Islam. Terj. Sari Meutia. Bandung: Mizan.

Lacey, A.R. 2000. A Dictionary of Philosophy. London, New York: Routledge.

Lakatos, Imre. 1970. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.

_____. 1970. Musgrave ed., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

_____. 1995. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Minhaji, Akh. 2013. Tradisi Akademik di Perguruan Tinggi. Yogyakarta: SUKA Press.

Muslih, Mohammad. 2012. “Pemikiran Islam Kontemporer, antara Mode Pemikiran dan Model Pembacaanâ€, Tsaqafah, Vol. 8. No. 2. Oktober.

Ney, Alyssa. 2012. “Neo-Positivist Metaphysics.†Philosophical Studies. Vol. 160. No. 1. August.

Nn, Katalog Buku 2014. Malang: UIN-Malang Press.

Rifai, Nurlena, Fauzan, Wahdi Sayuti, Bahrissalim. 2014. Integrasi Keilmuan dalam Pengembangan Kurikulum di UIN Se-Indonesia: Evaluasi Penerapan Integrasi Keilmuan UIN dalam Kurikulum dan Proses Pembelajaran. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Riyanto, Waryani Fajar. 2012. Implementasi Paradigma Integratif-Interkonesi dalam Penelitian 3 (Tiga) Disertasi Dosen UIN Sunan Kalijaga. Yogyakarta: Lemlit UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.

_____. 2013. “Pengembangan Kurikulum Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman di PTAI (Sebuah Ikhtiar Pencarian Landasan Filosofi).†Forum Tarbiyah. Vol. 11. No. 2. Desember.

_____. 2013. Integrasi-Interkoneksi Keilmuan: Biografi Intelektual M. Amin Abdullah (1953-…), Person, Knowledge, and Institution. Yogyakarta: Suka Press.

Rolston III, Holmes. 1987. Science and Religion: A Critical Survey. New York: Random House.

Schick, Jr. Theodore, ed. 2000. Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Mountain View. CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.

Setia, Adi. 2007. “Three Meanings of Islamic Science: Toward Operationalizing Islamization of Science.†Jurnal Islam & Science. Vol. 5. No. 1.

Shaleh, Fauzan. 2004. Modern Trends in Islamic Theological Discourse in Twentieth Century Indonesia: A Critical Survey, (Teologi Pembaruan: Pergeseran Wacana Islami Sunni di Indonesia abad XX). Jakarta: Serambi.

Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 2008. Membaca sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Sumber Elektronik dan Internet

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/ diakses Jum’at, 07 Okt 2016 jam 03.45

http://www.personalityresearch.org/metatheory.html diakses pada Sabtu, 06 Agustus 2016 jam 20.55

https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kota_Malang, akses 7 Okt 2016 jam 19.48

https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kota_Yogyakarta#Geografi, akses 7 Okt 2016 jam 19.51

https://www.britannica.com/topic/verifiability-principle, diakses pada Ahad 07 Agustus 2016 jam 08.38

Downloads

Published

2019-03-01

How to Cite

Muslih, M. (2019). Dinamika Pengembangan Ilmu di UIN Malang dan UIN Yogyakarta. Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam, 17(1), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v17i1.2939

Issue

Section

Articles