Mewujudkan Keadilan Restoratif Melalui Pendekatan Dual-Track System Dalam Tindak Pidana Korporasi Di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21111/ijtihad.v19i2.15423Keywords:
restorative justice, dual-track system, corporate crime, restoration, modern criminal lawAbstract
Contemporary criminal law paradigm transformation directs towards restorative approaches prioritizing rehabilitation and social accountability over retribution. In corporate criminal offenses, restorative justice implementation becomes urgent considering legal entities bear socio-economic responsibilities to the public. This research examines restorative justice implementation through dual-track system in handling corporate crimes in Indonesia. Dual-track system integrates penal and non-penal tracks simultaneously to achieve equilibrium between sanctions and restoration. Normative juridical research method with conceptual and statute approaches analyzes regulations including Limited Liability Company Law, Anti-Corruption Law, and corporate law enforcement policies. Research findings demonstrate corporate law enforcement insufficiently relies solely on criminal sanctions, but must integrate victim restoration, governance reform, and good corporate governance implementation. Dual-track system enables proportional law enforcement where criminal sanctions function as deterrents while non-penal mechanisms facilitate systemic improvements and recidivism prevention. This study concludes restorative justice through dual-track system represents corporate criminal law modernization adaptive to corporation-state-society relational complexities, directing future law enforcement orientation toward legal certainty, substantive justice, and social utility synergy for sustainable legal systems.References
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Kencana, 2016. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Clc_DwAAQBAJ.
Astuti, Mirsa, and Muhammad Faris Aksa. “Pendekatan Restoratif Sebagai Alternatif Sanksi Pidana Dalam Kejahatan Korporasi.” Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum 2 (2021): 679–84. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i3.195.
Braithwaite, John. “Scaling Up Crime Prevention and Justice.” Crime and Justice 50, no. 1 (2021): 247–99. https://doi.org/10.1086/716093.
Bulan, Dewi Nawang, and Nandang Sambas. “Kebijakan Pemidanaan Korporasi Dalam Ruu Kuhp: Analisis Normatif Dan Kesiapan Praktis Aparat Penegak Hukum.” Collegium Studiosum Journal 8, no. 1 (2025): 25–30.
Dwi Kurniawan, Kukuh, and Dwi Ratna Indri Hapsari. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Menurut Vicarious Liability Theory.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 29, no. 2 (2022): 324–46. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss2.art5.
Eliksander Siagian, Mohammad Ekaputra, Mahmul Siregar, and Alvi Syahrin. “Urgensi Pengaturan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Perseroan Terbatas Dalam Kegiatan Bisnisnya.” Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review 2, no. 7 (2023): 585–97.
Faharuddin, Rizal, and Jefferson Hakim. “Restorative Justice for Corruption Cases the Settlement of Corruption Cases: Is It Possible?” Yuridika 38, no. 1 (2023): 73–94. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i1.42511.
Marshall, Tony. “Restorative Justice: An Overview, London: Home Office Research Development and Statistic Directorate.” Halaman, 1999.
Muladi, and Dwidja Priyatno. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi: Edisi Ketiga. Kencana, 2015. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=repADwAAQBAJ.
Ness, Daniel W Van. “The Shape of Things to Come: A Framework for Thinking about A Restorative Justice System.” Tübingen, no. 11 (2012): 1–15.
Pardamean, Michael Christoper. “Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Atas Tindak Pidana Korporasi.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 7365–72. https://review-unes.com/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Peraturan Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor. “Nomor PER-028/A/JA/10/2014 Tentang Pedoman Penanganan Perkara Pidana Dengan Subjek Hukum Korporasi,” 2014.
Peraturan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. “Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.” Jdih Bpk Ri, 2020, 5. https://jdih.kejaksaan.go.id/inventaris/berkas/berkas_4150.pdf.
Prameswari, Anindytha Arsa, Gerhard Mangara, and Rifdah Rudi. “Deferred Prosecution Agreement: Mekanisme Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Perusakan Lingkungan Melalui Paradigma.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 2, no. 12 (2021): 1200–1222. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v2i12.154.
Priatama, Alvin. “Analisis Strategi Keagenan Korporasi Bpjs Ketenagakerjaan Dalam Meningkatkan Coverage Kepesertaan Pekerja Informal,” 2024.
Ramadai, Eko Wahyu, Qorin Anida Salma, and Adinda Agis Fitria Cahyani. “This Open-Access Article Is Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC) 4.0 License 106.” Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law 2, no. 3 (2024): 106–16.
Rohman, Taufikur, and Sugiharto. “Pemidanaan Model Double Track System Bagi Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup.” Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum 13, no. 1 (2023): 19–47. https://doi.org/10.56943/dekrit.v13n1.155.
Sara, Yuni, Widati Wulandari, and Erika Magdalena Chandra. “Mparsialitas Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Di Luar Pengadilan Melalui Mediasi Penal.” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 12, no. September (2024): 272–89.
Silalahi, Heriantonius. “Harmonization of Tax Criminal Law Enforcement with the New Criminal Code (KUHP): A Restorative Justice Perspective.” Sinergi International Journal of Law 3, no. 2 (2025): 92–114. https://doi.org/10.61194/law.v3i2.596.
Simpson, Sally S. “Corporate Crime, Law, and Social Control.” Corporate Crime, Law, and Social Control, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511606281.
Sjawie, Hasbullah F. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Pada TIPIKOR. Kencana, 2018. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=9uZeDwAAQBAJ.
Soemodihardjo, R. Dyatmiko. “Keterkaitan White Collar Crime Dengan Corporate Crime.” Perspektif 8, no. 2 (2003): 108. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v8i2.300.
Sriwidodo, Joko, Rahmat Saputra, Alfarisi Widodo, and Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya. “Reforming Indonesia’s Approach To Transfer Of Sentenced Persons: A Maqāṣid Al-Sharīʿa Framework And A Comparative Analysis Of Asean And European Models.” INVEST: Journal of Sharia and Economic Law 5, no. 2 (2025): 243–70.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. “Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana,” no. 16100 (2023).
———. “Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik” 5, no. 4 (2018): 42–52. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v5i4.305.
———. “Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2O11 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Negara Republik Indonesia, no. 144881 (2022): 1–63.
———. “Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.” CWL Publishing Enterprises, Inc., Madison 2004, no. May (2004): 352.
———. “Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor I1 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik” 44, no. 8 (2011): 287.
———. “Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” 1999, 1–20. http://peraturan.go.id/common/dokumen/ln/2001/uu20-2001.pdf.
———. “Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2021 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.” Menteri Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia, no. 112784 (2021): 11.
Wafi, Syafiq, Abdullah Widy As-shidiq, and Rifki Yustisio. “The Use of the DPA Concept and the Formulation of Sanctions as a Reform of State Loss Recovery in Cases of Corruption by Corporations” 1, no. 1 (2025): 1–17.
Wangga, Maria Silvya Elisabeth, Aditya Wirawan, and R. Bondan Agung Kardono. “Corruption and Money Laundering Perspective of Criminal Law and Criminology.” Research Horizon 2, no. 2 (2022): 363–73. https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.2.2.2022.363-373.
Zinsstag, E, M Teunkens, and B Pali. “Conferencing: A Way Forward for Restorative Justice in Europe.” European Forum for Restorative Justice, 2009, 168.
Zulfa, Eva Achjani. “Keadilan Restoratif Di Indonesia: Studi Tentang Kemungkinan Penerapan Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Praktek Penegakan Hukum Pidana).” Perpustakaan Universitas Indonesia, 2009, 420. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20278559.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ijtihad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
