Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penguasaan Narkotika Tanpa Sadar Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia

Authors

  • aryadi almaududy Fakultas Hukum, Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Mataram
  • suheflihusnaini ashady Universitas Mataram
  • ahwan ahwan Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/ijtihad.v19i2.15348

Keywords:

narcotic, legal protection, Unconscious Possession

Abstract

The phenomenon of unconscious possession of narcotics represents a critical issue in Indonesia’s criminal justice system, where individuals may be convicted solely based on physical possession of evidence without proof of intent (mens rea). Article 112 of Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, which omits the element of intent, creates an imbalance between legal certainty and substantive justice. This study aims to analyze the legal protection mechanisms for individuals who unknowingly possess narcotics and to examine the state’s responsibility in preventing the criminalization of innocent citizens. This research applies a normative legal approach combining conceptual, statutory, and comparative analyses. Primary legal materials include Law No. 35 of 2009, the Attorney General’s Regulation No. PER-029/A/JA/12/2015, and the Attorney General’s Guideline No. 11 of 2021. Data were analyzed qualitatively through the lens of criminal liability theory, the principle of culpability, and the presumption of innocence. The findings indicate that legal protection for unconscious possession cases remains ineffective due to weak implementation of integrated assessments and the absence of judicial interpretation concerning intent. Therefore, a normative reconstruction is required by adding the element of “knowingly” in Article 112 and enforcing mandatory integrated assessments as a formal prerequisite for valid investigations.

References

Al’anam, M. “Teori Keadilan Perspektif Gustav Radbruch: Hubungan Moral Dan Hukum.” Universitas Abulyatama Jurnal Humaniora 9, no. 1 (2025): 119–33. https://doi.org/10.30601/humaniora.v%vi%i.6393.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Prenada Media, 2016.

BNN, Humas. “HANI 2024: Masyarakat Bergerak, Bersama Melawan Narkoba Mewujudkan Indonesia Bersinar,” 2024. https://bnn.go.id/Hani-2024-Masyarakat-Bergerak-Bersama-Melawan-Narkoba-Mewujudkan-Indonesia-Bersinar.

Buran, Felix, and S Hayon. “Moralitas Dan Kewajiban: Pemikiran Etis Emanuel Kant.” Jurnal Sains Ekonomi Dan Edukasi 1, no. 12 (2024): 1011–19. https://doi.org/10.62335.

Hardinanto, A. “Manfaat Analogi Dalam Hukum Pidana Untuk Mengatasi Kejahatan Yang Mengalami Modernisasi.” Yuridika 31, no. 2 (2017): 220. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v31i2.4782.

Henry, James. “Sorotan Laporan Narkoba Dunia UNODC 2024,” 2023. https://www.issup.net/id/knowledge-share/resources/2024-08/sorotan-laporan-narkoba-dunia-unodc-2024-refleksi-singkat.

Indah, A V, and A Muqsith. “Panic Buying: Konsumerisme Masyarakat Indonesia Di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19 Perspektif Psikoanalisis Jacques Lacan.” Jurnal Filsafat 31, no. 1 (2021): 24–48.

Johan, N B. Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2008.

Julyano, M, and A Y Sulistyawan. “Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum.” Jurnal Crepido 1 (2019). https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/crepido/.

Laili, A, and A R Fadhila. “Teori Hukum Progresif (Prof. Dr. Satjipto Rahardjo, S.H.).” Jurnal SINDA 1, no. 1 (2021): 122–32. https://doi.org/10.28926/sinda.v1i1.966.

Lamintang, P A F, and Franciscus Theojunior Lamintang. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika, 2019.

Matondang, T I, and K K Lewoleba. “Hukum Dan Moralitas: Kajian Hubungan Asas Hukum Dan Moral.” Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) 2, no. 3 (2024): 125. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11564015.

Munandar Ar, A, A Slamet Rusbandi, M Zulhendra, S Bahri, and D Fajri. “Peran Niat (Mens Rea) Dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Di Indonesia.” JIMMI: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin 1 (2024): 240–52. https://jurnal.fanshurinstitute.org/index.php/jimmi.

Nikolas, D L L H, and S Dewi. “Dasar Konseptual Dan Implementasi Restorative Justice Oleh Polri Untuk Mewujudkan Tujuan Dan Fungsi Hukum (Kepastian, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan).” UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 4197–4203.

Prasetya, Djaelani M. “Keberatan Pidana Perihal Kepemilikan Narkotika.” Jurnal Supremasi 13 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473(20)30235-8.

Ristiono, F F, and A Sriyanto. “Mengungkap Modus Operandi Penyelundupan NPP Pada KPUBC Tipe A Tanjung Priok.” Jurnal Perspektif Bea Dan Cukai 2, no. 1 (2018).

Salsabila, L, A Alfian, and A Azhari. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana.” JUSTITIA: Journal of Justice, Law Studies, and Politic 1 (2025).

Salwa Azzahra, B. “Weaknesses in the Formulation of Article 112 of the Narcotics Act and Its Juridical Implications on the Prosecution and Sentencing of Self Narcotics Abusers,” n.d. http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/.

Sari, Gadis Fransiska Apriliana, and I A Q I H S. “Keadilan Terhadap Keputusan Hukum Sesat Berhubungan Pada Hilangnya Kepercayaan Masyarakat Terhadap Hukum.” Innovatif 3 (2023).

Stinneford, John F. “Punishment Without Culpability.” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 102, no. 3 (2012): 653–723. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/punishment-without-culpability/docview/1357567383/se-2.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29