ANALISIS KOMUNIKASI GLOBAL MELALUI FILM DALAM DISKURSUS YANG MENYUDUTKAN ISLAM

Laode Muhamad Fathun

Abstract


Globalization brings sovereignty of the country as indefinitely. Glo-balization makes global communication increasingly limited. Communica-tion through diplomacy is the way in mengespresikan kepentinganya any State against another State. Due to the influence of technology in the glo-balization phenomenon makes the instrument of diplomacy was changed as well as the jumlaah actors. Conventional diplomacy that uses Ministry of Foreign Affairs as a single actor has shifted to the public role in the for-mation of international opinion. Reatif diplomatic instruments through the film is one way to India through the representatives of film directors in the form fictional story to make a change on the discourse discourse meaning of Islam as a terrorist religion. The discourse of meaning making psychological blow for followers of the Muslim identity of the adherents of identity that is considered by some countries call it the United States as an actor fundamentalism. Through instrument Indian Bollywood films try to shape public opinion, especially the people of the United States that fact does Islam not as bad as perception shown in US foreign policy.


Keywords


Globalization, Information Technology, global communications, films, Bolllywood

Full Text:

PDF

References


Referensi

Carlesnaes, Walter, Dkk,. 2013, Handbook Hubungan Internasion-al,Bandung: Nusamedia.

Djelantik, Sukawarsini. 2008, Diplomasi Antara Teori & Praktek, Yogyakarta:­ Graha Ilmu.

Day, Amelia, 2012, GLOCAL Media, ISBN-10: 147696555 ISBN-13: 978-1477696552, Beberapa materi pustaka di buku ini bisa dibaca selengkapnya di http://glocalmediabook.wordpress. com

Hendropryono,.A.,M 2009, Terorisme Fundamentalis , Islam, Kris-ten dan Yahudi, Jakarta: Kompas Media Nusantara.

Jemadu, Akleksius 2014, politik Global Edisis ke 2 Dalam Teori dan Praktek, Yogyakarta,:Graha Ilmu.

Koehane, Robert, Nye, Joseph.2000, Globalization: What is New

, What Is Not, (And So What) Foreign Policy, Boston and Toronto : Litle Brown.

Marty, R. M. Natanegawa. 2009 Mesin Diplomasi Cukup Tangguh Memperjuangkan Kepentingan Bangsa, Tabloid Diplomasi, No.25 Tahun II 15 November -14 Desember, Diterbitkan Jakarta :Direktorat Diplomasi Publik Departemen Luar Negeri R.I Bekerjasama dengan Pilar Indo Meditama. Morghenthau , Hans..J., 1991, Politik Antar Bangsa,Edisi Revisi ,

Buku Ketiga, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.

Nicolson, , Harold 1974, Diplomacy Ten and Now dalam Theory and practice of international relation , Wiliam C Olson dan Fred A Soedarman 2 nd Edition,: New Jersey, Prenticel Hall.

Nielsen:Jargen, S., 2007,Islamic Political Radicalism A European Per-spective, Edited Tahir Abbas, Edinburgh University Press Ltd.

Roy , S.L. 1991, Diplomasi, Jakarta :Rajawali Press.

Syamhim. 2008, Hukum Diplomatik Dalam Kerangka Study Analisis,

Jakarta: Rajawali Pres : PT.Raja Grafindo Persada.

Thantowi , Jawahir :2004, ISLAM NEO-IMPREALISME DAN TER-ORISME, Prespektif Hukum Internasional Dan Nasional, Yogyakarta : UII PRESS.

Winarno , Budi, 2012, Isu-Isu Global Kontemporer, Yogyakarta: CAPS.

. Bush Speech at Wespoint 2002”, http://www.usinfo.state.gov, diakses tanggal 11 Desember 2015 pukul 20.32.

Donald H. Rusmfeld, “Tranforming the Military”, Foreign Affairs, Mei/Juni 2002, hal.2




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21111/dauliyah.v3i1.1869

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 118 times
PDF - 267 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Web
Analytics

View My Stats 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.