STUDENTS’ SELF-ASSESSMENT OF FAN–N–PICK IMPLEMENTATION IN ENGLISH VOCABULARY LEARNING ACTIVITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21111/ijelal.v6i1.15467Keywords:
Cooperative Learning, Fan–N–Pick Structure, Students’ Self-Assessment, Vocabulary InstructionAbstract
This study investigates students’ responses to the implementation of the Fan–N–Pick structure in English vocabulary instruction through a self-assessment questionnaire. It was used for the first time in the Primary Teacher Education Program to capture students’ evaluations and reflections on their learning experience throughout Fan–N–Pick–based activities. A descriptive quantitative design was employed. 26 students completed a 20-item closed-ended self-assessment questionnaire adapted from Cepni and Oner (2015) and Goto Butler and Lee (2010). The questionnaire measured six indicators of students’ learning experiences. The results show predominantly positive responses across the six indicators: learning goals, learning planning, expectations for success, self-control, process self-assessment, and product self-assessment. Students frequently indicated strong engagement, improved vocabulary performance, and positive perceptions toward cooperative vocabulary learning through Fan–N–Pick. The study provides insights into the use of Fan–N–Pick as an effective cooperative learning structure for vocabulary development in higher education. The structure supports 21st-century learning by promoting collaboration, communication, creativity, critical thinking, and social interaction. These findings suggest that Fan–N–Pick can serve as an engaging and meaningful instructional strategy for vocabulary learning in teacher education programs.References
Abd Karim, R., & Awaludin, F. A. (2020). Developing primary school students’english communication skills and team building through fan-n-pick learning model. European Journal of English Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3737149
Abdulwahhab, M. L., & Hashim, B. H. (2020, July). The effect of cooperative learning strategy on the engagement in architectural education. In IOP Conference series: Materials science and engineering (Vol. 881, No. 1, p. 012004). IOP Publishing. https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.3737149.svg
Akramy, S. A., Noori, A. Q., Orfan, S. N., & Hashemi, A. (2022). Effective techniques of teaching vocabulary in Afghan EFL classrooms. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00151-8
Al-Rashidi, A. H., Asif, M., Vanani, M. G., & Aberash, A. (2022). Learner-oriented assessment (LOA) practice: the comparative study of self-assessment, peer assessment, and teacher assessment on EFL learners’ writing complicity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF), speaking CAF, and attitude. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00209-x
Al-Yaseen, W. S. (2014). Cooperative learning in the EFL classroom. In International Academic Conference Proceedings (pp. 92-98).
Amelia, R. A. (2017). The Effect of Fan-N-Pick By Card On Students’ Ability IN Speaking Skills (Doctoral dissertation).
Anugerahwati, M. (2019). Integrating the 6cs of the 21st century education into the english lesson and the school literacy movement in secondary schools. KnE Social Sciences, 165-171. https://doi.org/DOI 10.18502/kss.v3i10.3898
Çepni, O., & Öner, S. T. (2015). The opinions and self-assessments of the 7th grade students regarding the jigsaw I technique among the cooperative learning practices in the social studies course. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 4(2), 22-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/jct.v4n2p22
Drakeford, W. (2012). The effects of cooperative learning on the classroom participation of students placed at risk for societal failure. Online Submission, 2(4), 239-246.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (Vol. 7, p. 429). New York: McGraw-hill.
Goto Butler, Y., & Lee, J. (2010). The effects of self-assessment among young learners of English. Language testing, 27(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209346370
Harjono, H. S. (2011). Is cooperative learning better than individual learning in reading comprehension workshop?. Jurnal Tekno-pedagogi, 1(1).
Hasnalia, R., & Rifli, N. R. (2023). Self-Assessment of English Writing Skills. Pedagogical Research Journal, 1(1), 7-12.
Kagan, S., & Kagan, S. (1994). Kagan Cooperative learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan.
Kern, A. L., Moore, T. J., & Akillioglu, F. C. (2007, October). Cooperative learning: Developing an observation instrument for student interactions. In 2007 37th Annual Frontiers In Education Conference-Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports (pp. T1D-1). IEEE.
Lateef, M. A. (2017). A qualitative descriptive exploratory study of teaching methodologies utilised by nurse educators in South West Nigeria (Doctoral dissertation).
Lessard-Clouston, M. (2013). Teaching Vocabulary. TESOL International Association. 1925 Ballenger Avenue Suite 550, Alexandria, VA 22314.
Lianisya, L. (2014). The use of self-assessment towards students’reading behavior (A case study). Journal of English and Education, 2(2), 26-35.
Lisma, L. (2018). Developing students'vocabulary by using notebook at smpn 12 palopo (Doctoral dissertation, INSTITUT AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI PALOPO).
Lismay, L., & Ramadhani, P. L. (2021). The Students’ Self-Assessment on Their English Language Learning. Modality Journal: International Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 1(2), 110-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/mj.v1i2.4891
Llamosas Corrales, L. E. (2014). Teaching vocabulary learning strategies: a vocabulary improvement program (VIP) for EFL beginner students from Centro Cultural Peruano Norteamericano Arequipa.
Marzano, R. J. (2004). A six-step process for teaching vocabulary. Building background knowledge for academic achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Prevost, J. K. (2010). A case study of a vocabulary strategy in a high school class of special education students. Ph. D. Thesis.
Puspitasari, F. (2018). Cooperative Learning: Engaging Young Learners in a Large Class. The 2nd International Conference On Child-Friendly Education (ICCE) 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/11617/10417
Race, P. (2001). A briefing on self, peer and group assessment. LTSN generic centre assessment guides series.
Ruslan, R. (2017). Developing vocabulary mastery through word association by the second year students of smp muhammadiyah al amin sorong. Qalam: Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan, 6(2), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.33506/jq.v6i2.206
Shana, Z., Lahiani, H., & Mahmoud, S. (2020). The effects of Kagan structures on UAE sixth grade students’ performance of reading comprehension: a pilot study. Education 3-13, 48(8), 988-999. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2019.1687555
Sunusi, S. L., & Bhat, B. A. (2021). Developing teaching material design of basic English Vocabulary based on interactive multimedia for Elementary School. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 4(3), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v4i3.123
Waldvogel, D. A. (2013). The Relationships between Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Vocabulary Size among Adult Spanish Foreign Language Learners. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.2.209-219
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright notice:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)


