EMOTIONAL ENGAGEMENT ON MEGAWATI'S SPEECH IN GOLKAR ANNIVERSARY

Authors

  • Nazarudin Manik Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Aprili Yanti Universitas Potensi Utama

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/ijelal.v5i2.13794

Keywords:

Cultural Alignment, Emotional Engagement, Indonesian Politics, Political Rhetoric

Abstract

Emotional engagement in political rhetoric significantly shapes public perception and influences political narratives. This study explores the rhetorical strategies employed by Megawati Soekarnoputri during the Golkar Party's 60th-anniversary celebration. By adopting a qualitative discourse-historical approach, the research identifies three core themes: the strategic use of humor and irony to address past tensions, cultural alignment to resonate with Indonesian values, and the narrative of reconciliation to promote unity. Megawati’s ironic remark, "Kan aku dimusuhin sejagat Dewa Pitara. Sekarang diundang, bingung aku," exemplifies her ability to transform historical grievances into opportunities for emotional connection and relatability. Her use of humor diffuses tension while reinforcing her leadership image. Furthermore, her alignment with Indonesian cultural principles, such as gotong royong (cooperation) and rukun (harmony), enhances the emotional resonance of her rhetoric, positioning her as both approachable and authoritative. This study underscores the significance of emotional engagement and cultural sensitivity in political communication, particularly in Indonesia’s coalition-driven political landscape. By highlighting the intersection of rhetorical strategy, cultural resonance, and political unity, the research contributes to understanding the role of culturally informed rhetoric in navigating complex socio-political contexts.

References

Anwar, S. (2016). Political Discourse in Indonesia: A Study of Leadership Rhetoric. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 47(3), 312-329.

Aristotle. (2004). Rhetoric. Dover Publications.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.

Chilton, P. (2004). Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power. Pearson Education.

Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books.

Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Beacon Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold.

Haryanto, A. (2018). Emotional Rhetoric in Indonesian Political Speeches. Asian Journal of Political Science, 26(4), 421-437.

Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Chelsea Green Publishing.

Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and Discrimination. Routledge.

Sapir, E. (1949). Selected Writings in Language, Culture, and Personality. University of California Press.

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.

van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and Manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359-383.

Wodak, R. (2009). The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Palgrave Macmillan.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2015). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. Sage Publications.

Yulianto, P. (2020). Humor and Irony in Indonesian Political Rhetoric. International Journal of Communication, 14(1), 56-72.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-01-24

Accepted

2025-07-13

Published

2025-07-14