Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/tasfiyah <p style="text-align: justify;">Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam is Journal of Aqidah, Philosophy, Islamic Thought and Sufi Discourse. Which is published in collaboration, <a href="http://afi.unida.gontor.ac.id/">Department of Aqidah and Islamic Philosophy Faculty of Ushuluddin University of Darussalam Gontor</a> with <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GB_yNLegVjUhFzx6i6Yfxq6DtCmdGb-H/view?usp=sharing">Institute for the Study of Islamic Thought and Civilization (INSISTS)</a> Jakarta. Tasfiyah is published regularly, twice a year: February and August. As a journal of Islamic Thought, editors accept all kinds of forms: either articles or research article as well, related to aqeedah discourse, the discussion of Islamic thought, philosophy, Sufism, and Kalam.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam has been <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BVGsqqEcr34Jstu_fL34HQwqi8ea4RYo/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Accredited </a>by the Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education of Republic of Indonesia and indexed with the grade "S3" (from Vol.5, No.2, 2021) in Science and Technology Index (<a href="https://sinta.kemdikbud.go.id/journals/detail?id=4644" target="_blank" rel="noopener">SINTA</a>).</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">The submitted manuscript would be check for plagiarism using by <a href="https://unidagontor.turnitin.com/originality/hand-in-link?jwt=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJyZWR3b29kSWQiOiJkMGVhM2MyOS01ZDM5LTQ0M2QtYjliMy1kZGQ0ZGFhMTZlNDciLCJleHAiOjE3MjUwNDQ3MDAsImlhdCI6MTY5Mjk0Mjk0NywianRpIjoiMTk4N2I4N2EtNTlhMi00ZmM2LThhYzgtMWQ1NjA4NDVhZDU4IiwidGVuYW50IjoidW5pZGFnb250b3IiLCJmb2xkZXJJZCI6IjM4N2U5ZWM5LTI1NWEtNGVhNy1hZjVlLWRjZjAyMmE2ODNhNyJ9.LYs_HUNt-JKudHX75bEnhE-rWnYhelRQdZHrwl43Y1g" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Turnitin</a> <span id="result_box" class="short_text" lang="en">with maximum tolerance 20 percent</span>. And the manuscript to be published must also be in accordance with the <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/13knrL_VMeSLYthL0bly6UGX6b7soTeyk/edit?usp=sharing&amp;ouid=111312387006592669122&amp;rtpof=true&amp;sd=true" target="_blank" rel="noopener">template</a> above.</p> University of Darussalam Gontor, Indonesia en-US Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 2549-6905 <div> <div>In order to be accepted and puslished by Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, author(s) submitting the article manuscript should complete all the review stages. By submitting the manuscripts the author(s) agreed to these following terms:</div> </div> <ol> <li>The copyright of received articles shall be assigned to <a href="https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/tasfiyah/management/settings/distribution//index.php/tasfiyah/index" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam</a> as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish articles in various forms (including reprints). <a href="https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/tasfiyah/management/settings/distribution//index.php/tasfiyah/index" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam</a> maintain the publishing rights to the published articles.</li> <li>Authors are permitted to disseminate published article by sharing the link/DOI of the article at <a href="https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/tasfiyah/management/settings/distribution//index.php/tasfiyah/index" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam</a>. authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam with an acknowledgement of initial publication to this journal.</li> <li>Users/public use of this website will be licensed to CC BY-NC-SA (Attribution &amp; Non-Commercial-ShareAlike)</li> </ol> Problem Konsep Manusia dalam Neo-Darwinisme: Kritik atas Pemikiran Richard Dawkins https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/tasfiyah/article/view/11180 <p><em>The discourse of human origin is a topic constantly being studied, because human always looking for his meaning and life purpose. One of scientist of Neo-Darwinism, Richard Dawkins, proposed the concept of human with a gene-centric view of evolution. The author uses a descriptive-analysis method to analyze the concept critically. The result is the author found some problems in the concept of human by Richard Dawkins, which human nature reduced to survival machine of replicators genes and memes only. The conclusion of this research is the concept of human by Richard Dawkins affected by naturalism worldview and his ontological commitment to the theory of evolution, made Dawkins define human only from the material side and neglected the immaterial side also other dimensions to comprehend the meaning of human itself</em></p> Yongki Sutoyo Fasya Tharra Annada Copyright (c) 2024 Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2024-03-19 2024-03-19 8 1 1 32 10.21111/tasfiyah.v8i1.11180 Konsep Ilmu dalam Perspektif Islam https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/tasfiyah/article/view/11258 <p>The study of knowledge in Islam is very important. Knowledge in modern times is considered lacking in explaining phenomena in this era. The purpose of writing this article is to analyze the Islamic perspective on science, including the concepts, classifications, and roots of science. This research method is qualitative with a literature study approach originating from e-journals, books and trusted media. The results of this study state that <em>first,</em> the concept of science according to Islam does not only discuss physical aspects, but also metaphysical aspects. Science must also have objectivity, meaning that it can be accepted by many people and not be influenced by individual thoughts. <em>Second,</em> Islam broadly classifies knowledge into two, namely <em>fardu ain</em> knowledge and <em>fardu kifayah </em>knowledge. Figures of Muslim scientists such as Al-Farabi and Ibn Nadhim divided world knowledge into more detail. <em>Third,</em> Knowledge in Islam comes from the Al-Qur'an, Hadith, intellect, and intuition. How to obtain this knowledge can be through revelation, five senses, reason, and heart or intuition. <em>Fourth,</em> Modern science in the West began to develop, and Western society relinquished the influence of the church to adopt a modern way of thinking that emphasized rationality and empirical evidence. Western thought considers religion and science to be separate, viewing this division as a hindrance to progress. However, in the Islamic tradition, religious and secular powers are not divided</p> Muhammad Farid Azfaruddin Abdullah Rasyid Lilik Mauludiyah Muhammad Lutfi Mustofa Copyright (c) 2024 Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2024-03-19 2024-03-19 8 1 33 54 10.21111/tasfiyah.v8i1.11258 Islamization of Science Ismail Raji al-Faruqi and Integration-Interconnection of Science Amin Abdullah: A Comparative Study https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/tasfiyah/article/view/11278 <p><em>The discourse on the dichotomy of modern science and Islamic science is an interesting topic of discussion and is always debated by Muslim scientists. Some of them, namely Ismail Raji al-Faruqi and Amin Abdullah, are trying to respond to and solve problems that occur in the scientific realm. Al-Faruqi initiated the Islamization of science which seeks to unify the two sciences (science and Islam). Likewise, Amin Abdullah with his integration-interconnection paradigm also offers an open dialogue between the two sciences. Then this research aims to look at the structure of thought between the two figures mentioned, as well as looking for common threads related to the similarities and differences in the ideas of science integration being promoted. This research uses library research methods through several textual sources related to the topic discussed, primarily in the form of books by the two figures studied, and secondary in the form of scientific articles that have related themes. The results of this article are: 1) The Islamization of al-Faruqi's knowledge leads to the relevance between science and Islam, science is Islamized through twelve concrete steps based on the concept of monotheism. 2) Amin Abdullah's ideas regarding integration-interconnection can be seen from the spider web framework which emphasizes mastery of various sciences, both modern science and Islamic science. 3) The similarities in thinking between the two can be seen through the spirit in answering scientific dichotomies. The difference is, that al-Faruqi emphasized mastery of modern knowledge (science) to then be converted to Islam to conform to the pattern of monotheistic teachings. Meanwhile, Amin Abdullah's ideas emphasized mastery of general science and Islam. So that each scientific group is aware of its limitations and shortcomings so that they can complement and complement each other</em></p> Muhammad Syihabuddin Achmad Khudori Soleh Achmad Yafik Mursyid Copyright (c) 2024 Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2024-03-19 2024-03-19 8 1 55 80 10.21111/tasfiyah.v8i1.11278 Insan Kamil and Homo Deus: A Pinnacle of Human Existence in the Digital Era https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/tasfiyah/article/view/11482 <p><em>The human civilization in the current digital era is marked by advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and reflective thought on human existence. This article aims to examine and to compare the pinnacle of human existence in the digital era from the perspectives of Muhammad Iqbal and digital anthropology. The issues discussed are the concepts of Insan Kamil in Iqbal and Homo Deus in digital anthropology, as well as the similarities and differences. The method used is library research with philosophical approach. The data obtained is analyzed qualitatively and comparatively. The results of this article include: the pinnacle of human existence, in Iqbal</em><em>’</em><em>s perspective, is understood as Insan Kamil, which is the best representation of divine vicegerent. Meanwhile, in digital anthropology, it can be understood as Homo Deus, which is human surpassing traditional biological limitations and approaching divine characteristics. Both perspectives share similarities in motivation to enhance well-being of humanity, recognizing evolution of human life, understanding the unlimited potential of each individual, and emphasizing the importance of obedience to laws and ethics. Whereas the differences emerge in applicability, religious aspects, achievement foundations, views on God, and the stance on digital technology use. Practically, this discussion raises indecision among practitioners due to the development and utilization of technology clearly separating these concepts. The recommendation for further research is alternative theories that bridge these intersecting ideas.</em></p> Mohamad Khusnial Muhtar Ahmad Firdaus Bin Mohd Zailani Copyright (c) 2024 Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2024-03-19 2024-03-19 8 1 81 102 10.21111/tasfiyah.v8i1.11482 Tajdid dan Kebangkitan Islam dalam Perspektif Yusuf Qardhawi https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/tasfiyah/article/view/11491 <p>The modern era requires thinkers, including Muslim scholars, to continue to play a role in the people’s development of following the rise of Western civilization since the 18th century. Reform (tajdid) is an expression that describes serious and continuous efforts to deal with this problem. The existence of an understanding that is contrary to these efforts can thwart the revival goal of the people. On the one hand, there is a view of conserving religious texts, on the other hand, there is a view encourages religion to adapt to the orientation of the human life. Yusuf Qardhawi is a contemporary scholar who is very authoritative in addressing the phenomena that occur through a number of his works which assess the importance of the wasat}iyyah principle in initiating reform. This literature study uses a qualitative approach concludes that the realm of reform (tajdid) for Qardhawi is the change of something from one situation to a better and more important condition (including reform of faith, reform of understanding, reform of fiqh and the law therein, as well as reform of preaching). This whole thing cannot be separated from the Al-Qur'an and Sunnah as the foundation for maintaining the principle of balance. For him, anything that is separated from the provisions of Divine revelation and only relies on human abilities will tend to produce contradictions. A reform (tajdid) concept that does not maintain the originality of revelation will create a pseudo-reform. Because according to him, the revival in the phase called <em>“Ushwah Isl</em><em>ā</em><em>miyyah”</em> requires every Muslim to cultivate love for the religion by believing in the perfection of its teachings without feeling inferior or dazzled by other civilizations.</p> Khansa' Azizah Aminullah Elhady Copyright (c) 2024 Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2024-03-19 2024-03-19 8 1 103 124 10.21111/tasfiyah.v8i1.11491 Wacana Dinamis Nahdlatul Ulama: Analisis Kritis terhadap Perubahan Sosial https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/tasfiyah/article/view/11613 <p><em>This research presents </em><em>critical study of Nahdlatul Ulama</em><em>’s dynamic discourse on social change. The background of this study is rooted in the significant role of NU in the history of Indonesia, particularly in the realm of cultural and religious ideologies. The research methodology employed encompasses a combination of qualitative approaches and document analysis to attain a comprehensive and profound comprehension, to understand how the NU tradition is integrated into moderate thinking and the extent to which the transformation of such thinking can act as a catalyst for societal progress. The theoretical framework of this research encompasses a profound understanding of the traditional values of NU, the concept of moderation as the cornerstone of thinking, and how thinking evolves in the face of contemporary challenges. The results of the analysis indicate that NU traditions not only persist in everyday life but are also effectively assimilated into the modern context. Moderation, as a pivotal aspect of NU thought, emerges as a crucial component in promoting interreligious dialogue and contributing to political stability. The transformation of NU's thinking is evident in its response to advancements in technology and science. Although NU thinking encounters challenges, particularly in preserving cultural heritage, this study underscores the opportunities for the development of NU thinking in the future. The conclusions of this study offer a critical evaluation of NU's impact on societal change and emphasize the significance of comprehending and permeating traditional values while remaining relevant in the face of evolving times. The implications of this research hold valuable insights for academics, practitioners, and policymakers in supporting the positive development of a society founded on the moderate values of NU.</em></p> Ilham Dwitama Haeba Anis Malik Thoha Rasinah Ahim Copyright (c) 2024 Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2024-03-19 2024-03-19 8 1 125 158 10.21111/tasfiyah.v8i1.11613 Qadiyyah Ru’yatillāh fī al-Ākhirah Inda Al-Qādī ‘Abdul Jabbār wa Abī al-Hasan al-‘Asy’arī https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/tasfiyah/article/view/11668 <p>This article discusses the debate on the issue of ru'yatullah between Abu Hasan Al-Asy'ari who said that seeing God is something that is possible, this statement was then opposed by Alqadhi Abdul Jabbar he argued that it was something impossible, even though they used the same arguments for their respective opinions, and each of them has an interpretation of the verse. This incident happened because there were no definite arguments about the possibility of seeing God or not in the afterlife. Therefore, the dichotomy between groups in this discussion does not drop the status of infidels for those who disagree with them. This article uses a type of literature review with an aqidah approach and the method used is a descriptive method and an inductive method, and a comparative method to compare the two understandings and reveal some similarities and differences in their understanding. The result is that the researchers found several methods used by Al-Qadhi Abdul Jabbar in discussing Aqidah, namely prioritizing reason rather than naql, making reason as a proposition, rejecting khabar wahid and using arguments from ta'wil al kalamiy. Meanwhile, the method of Abu Hasan Al-Asy'ari in discussing the issue of Aqidah is mediating between naql and reason, using aqli arguments, accepting ta'wil al kalamiy. The view of Al-Qadhi Abdul Jabbar in ru'yatullah is of the opinion that Allah cannot be seen in this world or in the hereafter, in contrast to Abu Hasan Al-Ash'ari according to him the meaning of the word ru'yah is to know the knowledge and power of Allah, they believe that the people The believer will see his Lord on the Day of Resurrection even if he does not know how. Not through the ability to see that is found in the ordinary eye, but with the ability that is bestowed by Allah Swt.</p> Rif'at Husnul Ma'afi Rahmadani Adi Yatma Copyright (c) 2024 Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 2024-03-19 2024-03-19 8 1 165 176 10.21111/tasfiyah.v8i1.11668