Pendampingan LKS Tematik SD Khas Budaya Masyarakat Kota Wisata Batu Jawa Timur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21111/ku.v2i2.3514Keywords:
Mentoring, Thematic LKS, Typical East JavaAbstract
Implementation, a community service program entitled "IbM Thematic Worksheets of Elementary Schools LKS Distinctive Culture of the City of Batu Tourism in East Java At SD Muhammadiyah 4 Batu City" this assistance began with a workshop on making thematic worksheets by highlighting the culture of Batu City. This program involves 4 lecturers as a service team and class I-VI teachers as participants of this activity. Prior to the implementation of the lecturers' activities, several coordinating meetings had been held to design community service and socialization activities to the school where the community service was held. This activity involves collaboration with partner schools / elementary schools. There is 1 school involved in this activity, namely SD Muhammadiyah 4 Batu, From the school the teacher appointed is grade I-VI. For the sake of the success of this partnership, teachers who will become training participants need to get strengthening of elementary thematic worksheets that are characterized by the culture of the people of Batu City, to preserve the local wisdom of Batu City. This LKS assistance is currently in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0, therefore we have strengthened the learning system in terms of local wisdom in the local area, Batu City, which is not only invited by students to abstract and imagine areas that have never been visited, the authors initiated to improve the city of stone as local wisdom and enter the material in the form of LKS. This worksheet consists of basic levels, low class to high class. The level of making these worksheets refers to the analysis of hots questions on the types of questions that we pack, so that the ability of students is fun to be able to live everyday, especially in stone city, as readers of our own products. This is related to the need for schools at the elementary school level.
References
Abdul Majid. 2008. Perencanaan Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Standar Kompetensi Guru. Bandung: PT. Rosda Karya
Abdul Majid& Chaerul Rochman. 2015. Pendekatan Ilmiah Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT. Rosda Karya
Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. 2001. Kerangka Landasan Untuk: Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. Terjemahan Agung Prihantoro. 2015. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Andi Prastowo. 2013. Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar inovatif. Yogyakarta: Diva Press
Arifin, Zainal. 2014. Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode dan Paradigma Baru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Berk, L.E. 2010. Development through the Lifespan: Dari Prenatal Sampai Remaja (Transisi Menjelang Dewasa). Terjemahan Daryatno. 2012. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Blakey, Elaine dan Spence, Sheila. 2008. Developing Metacognition. (http://www.education.com/parter/articles. Diakses pada 11 Juni 2018).
Desmita. 2006. Psikologi Perkembangan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Galton, M. 2007. Learning and Teaching in the Primary Classroom. Great Britain: Sage Publication.
Jager, B.D., Jansen, M. & Reezigt, G. 2005. The Development of Metacognitiopn in Primary School Learning Environments. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, (Online), 16(2): 179-196., (http://202.116.45.198/xxjy/xxjy2/content/wenjian/ckwx/y/7/1.PDF), diakses 10 Juni 2018.
Kuhn, D. & Dean, D. 2004. Metacognition: A Bridge between Cognitive Psychology and Educational Practice. Theory into Practice, (Online), 43(4): 268-273, (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232869320_Metacognition_A_Bridge_Between_Cognitive_Psychology_and_Educational_Practice), diakses 10 Juni 2018.
Lai, E.R. 2011. Metacognition: A Literature Review Research Report, (Online), (http://www.pearsonassessment.com/.research), diakses 10 Juni 2016.
Mulyasa, 2009. Menjadi Guru Profesional Menciptakan Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Menyenangkan). Bandung: Rosda karya
National Research Council (2012), A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas, Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards, Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Washington, DC.
OECD (2016), PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and FinancialLiteracy, PISA,
OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264255425-en OECD (2016), PISA 2015 Results in Focus, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. PP No. 13 tahun 2015 pasal I ayat 23
Sugiyono. 2007. Metode Penelitia Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Susanto. 2013. Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah dasar. Jakarta: Kencana Prenanda Media Group
UNEP (2012), 21 Issues for the 21st Century: Result of the UNEP Foresight Process on Emerging Environmental Issues, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi, Kenya, www.unep.org/pdf/Foresight_ Report-21_Issues_for_the_21st_Century.pdf.
Abdul Majid& Chaerul Rochman. 2015. Pendekatan Ilmiah Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT. Rosda Karya
Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. 2001. Kerangka Landasan Untuk: Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. Terjemahan Agung Prihantoro. 2015. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Andi Prastowo. 2013. Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar inovatif. Yogyakarta: Diva Press
Arifin, Zainal. 2014. Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode dan Paradigma Baru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Berk, L.E. 2010. Development through the Lifespan: Dari Prenatal Sampai Remaja (Transisi Menjelang Dewasa). Terjemahan Daryatno. 2012. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Blakey, Elaine dan Spence, Sheila. 2008. Developing Metacognition. (http://www.education.com/parter/articles. Diakses pada 11 Juni 2018).
Desmita. 2006. Psikologi Perkembangan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Galton, M. 2007. Learning and Teaching in the Primary Classroom. Great Britain: Sage Publication.
Jager, B.D., Jansen, M. & Reezigt, G. 2005. The Development of Metacognitiopn in Primary School Learning Environments. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, (Online), 16(2): 179-196., (http://202.116.45.198/xxjy/xxjy2/content/wenjian/ckwx/y/7/1.PDF), diakses 10 Juni 2018.
Kuhn, D. & Dean, D. 2004. Metacognition: A Bridge between Cognitive Psychology and Educational Practice. Theory into Practice, (Online), 43(4): 268-273, (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232869320_Metacognition_A_Bridge_Between_Cognitive_Psychology_and_Educational_Practice), diakses 10 Juni 2018.
Lai, E.R. 2011. Metacognition: A Literature Review Research Report, (Online), (http://www.pearsonassessment.com/.research), diakses 10 Juni 2016.
Mulyasa, 2009. Menjadi Guru Profesional Menciptakan Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Menyenangkan). Bandung: Rosda karya
National Research Council (2012), A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas, Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards, Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Washington, DC.
OECD (2016), PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and FinancialLiteracy, PISA,
OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264255425-en OECD (2016), PISA 2015 Results in Focus, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. PP No. 13 tahun 2015 pasal I ayat 23
Sugiyono. 2007. Metode Penelitia Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Susanto. 2013. Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah dasar. Jakarta: Kencana Prenanda Media Group
UNEP (2012), 21 Issues for the 21st Century: Result of the UNEP Foresight Process on Emerging Environmental Issues, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi, Kenya, www.unep.org/pdf/Foresight_ Report-21_Issues_for_the_21st_Century.pdf.