Peran Komunikasi dalam Pemberdayaan Remaja Broken Home Melalui Gerakan Survivor Broken Home

Authors

  • Yuni Retnowati Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komunikasi Yogyakarta
  • Partini Partini Prodi Sosiologi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Endang Sulastri Fakultas Peternakan, Universitas Gadjah Mada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/ejoc.v5i2.5071

Keywords:

perceraian, broken home, remaja, pemberdayaan, komunikasi, divorces, adolescents, empowerment, communication

Abstract

Abstrak Meningkatnya jumlah perceraian di Indonesia menyebabkan jumlah remaja broken home juga meningkat. Dampak negatif keluarga broken home pada umumnya berupa gangguan psikologis, perilaku dan emosi. Di kalangan masyarakat berkembang stigma terhadap remaja broken home sebagai remaja yang nakal, tidak bisa diatur, dan memberi pengaruh buruk kepada lingkungannya. Stigma ini menyebabkan mereka kehilangan motivasi dan menarik diri dari kehidupan sosial kemudian mencari pelarian sehingga terjerumus dalam pergaulan negatif. Hal ini menghambat perkembangan potensi dan kekuatan mereka. Gerakan survivor broken home bertujuan melakukan pengembangan diri remaja broken home sehingga berfungsi sebagai sarana pemberdayaan. Gerakan tersebut dilakukan melalui Komunitas Inspirasi Hamur yang memiliki aktivitas online di media sosial dan aktivitas offline berupa pertemuan rutin, pelatihan pengembangan diri dan kelas-kelas inspiratif untuk pemberdayaan anggota. Komunikasi memegang peranan penting dalam proses pemberdayaan ini. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) proses pemberdayaan remaja broken home dan (2) peran komunikasi pada setiap tahapan proses pemberdayaan. Penelitian ini bersifat kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Pemilihan informan dilakukan dengan teknik purposive sampling sedangkan pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan observasi media sosial virtual, wawancara mendalam, dan diskusi kelompok terfokus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proses pemberdayaan mengikuti 3 tahapan yaitu penyadaran, peningkatan kapasitas, dan pemberdayaan. Peran komunikasi dalam proses pemberdayaan adalah sebagai sarana pembentukan konsep diri, perubahan sikap, keyakinan, dan perilaku serta penggerak tindakan. Kesimpulannya , komunikasi berperan penting dalam pemberdayaan remaja broken home melalui pembentukan konsep diri yang berada pada tahap pembentukan kesadaran dalam proses pemberdayaan. Kontribusi penelitian adalah mendeskripsikan peran komunikasi dalam proses pemberdayaan remaja broken home.Abstract The increasing number of divorces in Indonesia also increases the number of broken home children. The negative impacts of broken home families are generally psychological, behavioral, and emotional disorders. There is a growing stigma against broken home adolescents as naughty, unruly, and negatively influencing their environment. This stigma causes them to lose motivation and withdraw from social life and then look for an escape to fall into negative associations. It hampers the development of their potential and strength. The survivor’s broken home movement aims to develop the broken home adolescent’s self to functions as a means of empowerment. This movement is carried out through the Hamur Inspiration Community, which has online activities on social media and offline activities like regular meetings, self-development training, and inspirational classes for member empowerment. Communication plays an essential role in this empowerment process. This study aims to determine: (1) the process of empowering broken home adolescents and (2) the role of communication at each stage of the empowerment process. This research is qualitative with a case study approach. The informant selection was carried out using the purposive sampling technique, while data collection was carried out by observing virtual social media, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions. The results showed that the empowerment process followed three stages: awareness, capacity building, and empowerment. The role of communication in the empowerment process is as a means of forming self-concepts, changing attitudes, beliefs, behavior, and driving action. In conclusion, communication plays an essential role in empowering broken home adolescents by developing self-concepts at the empowerment process’s awarenessbuilding stage. The research contribution is to describe the part of communication in the empowerment process of broken home adolescents.

References

Achwan, R. (1999). Indonesia dalam Transisi Menuju Demokrasi (A. Subhan (Ed.)). Jakarta: LSAF.Alika, H. I., & Edosa, O. S. (2012). Relationship between Broken Homes and Academic Achievement of Secondary School Students in Oredo Local Government Area of Edo State, Nigeria. College Student Journal, 46(2),256–263. http://www. projectinnovation.biz/csj_2006. htmlAmato, P. R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4),1269–1287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741- 3737.2000.01269.xAncok, D. (2002). Outbound Management Training: Aplikasi Ilmu Perilaku dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta : UII Press.Aziz, M. (2019). Perilaku Sosial Anak Remaja Korban Broken Home Dalam Berbagai Perspektif (Suatu Penelitian di SMPN 18 Kota Banda Aceh). Jurnal AL-IJTIMAIYYAH: Media Kajian Pengembangan Masyarakat Islam, 1(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.22373/alijtimaiyyah.v1i1.252Bappenas. (2018). Jumlah Penduduk Indonesia Menurut Kelompok Umur dan Jenis Kelamin.Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movements : An Overview and Assessment. Annu. Rev. Sociol, 1974, 611–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.soc.26.1.611 BKKBN. (2017). Laporan Survei Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia.BPS. (2018). Angka Pernikahan dan Perceraian di Indonesia dari 2015-2017.Caban, M. (2018). Youth Empowerment Model Analysis.Chitnis, K. S. (2005). Communication for empowerment and participatory development: A social model of health in Jamkhed, India. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, August, 1–262.Clark, E. (2012). Social Movement and Social Media : A Qualitative Study of Occupy Wall Street. Independent. Södertörn University, Stockhlom, Sweden.Crossley, A. D. (2015). Facebook feminism: Social media, blogs, and new technologies of contemporary U.S. Feminism. Mobilization, 20(2), 253– 268. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086- 671x-20-2-253Daymon, C., & Holloway, I. (2011). Qualitative Research Methods in Public Relations and Marketing Communications. New York : Routledge. Dirjen Badan Peradilan Agama Mahkamah Agung, 2020. (n.d.).Dwidjowijoto, & Wrihatnolo. (2007). Manajemen Pemberdayaan : Sebuah pengantar dan Panduan Untuk Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Jakarta : Elex Media Komputindo.Edwards, B., & McCarthy, J. D. (2004). Resources and Social Movement Mobilization. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriese (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 116–152). Blackwell Publishing.Erikson, E. (1995). Identity: Youth and Crisis. W.W Norton Co.Gamson, W. A., & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). gamson1993.pdf. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528 (1), 114– 125. https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.1177/0002716293528001009Hedebro, G. (1982). Communication and Social Change in Developing Nations : A Critical View. Ames : Iowa State University Press.Hodgetts, D. J., & Stolte, O. E. E. (2012). CaseBased Research in Community and Social Psychology : Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22, 379–389. https:// doi.org/10.1002/casp.2124Horn, J. (2013). Gender and Social Movements: Overview Report. Bridge UK : Institute of Development Studies.Hurlock, E. (2002). Psikologi Perkembangan (5th edition). Jakarta : Erlangga.Ife, J. W. (2002). Community Development: Creating Community AlternativesVision, Analysis and Practice. Australia :Longman.Jaiswal, B., Bhasin, S., & Sharma, A. (2015). Empowerment of Youth: A Challenge of 21st Century. IJournals: Internacional Journal of Social Relevance & Concern (IJSRC), 3(8), 8. http://ijournals.in/ijsrc/wpcontent/uploads/2015/08/1.3801- Bimal.compressed.pdfJennings, L. B., Parra-Medina, D. M., Messias, D. A. K. H., & McLoughlin, K. (2012). Toward a critical social theory of youth empowerment. Youth Participation and Community Change, 5422, 31–56. https://doi. org/10.1300/J125v14n01_03Kartono, K. (2014). Patologi Sosial 2 Kenakalan Remaja. Jakarta : PT Grafindo Persada.Kelly, J. B., & Emery, R. E. (2003). Children’s Adjustment Following Divorce: Risk and Resilience Perspectives. Family Relations, 52(4), 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741- 3729.2003.00352.xKeyton, J. (2011). Communication and Organizational Culture: A Key to Understanding Work Experience. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Lee, J. A. ., & Hudson, R. E. (2011). Empowerment Approach to Social Work Practice. In F. J. Turner (Ed.), Social Work Treatment: Interlocking Theoretical Approaches (Sixth Edit, pp. 157–178). New York : Oxford University Press.Mardikanto, T. (2013). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat oleh Perusahaan: Corporate Social Responsibility: Acuan Bagi Praktisi, Akademisi, dan Pemerhati Program CSR. Surakarta : Sebelas Maret University Press.Melucci, A. (1980). The new social m o ve m e n t s : A t h e o r e t i c a l approach. Social Science Information, 19(2), 199–226. https://doi. org/10.1177/053901848001900201Melucci, A. (1995). The Process of Collective Identity. In Hank Johnston (Ed.), Social Movements and Culture (4th ed., pp. 41–63). London : UCL Press.Miles, M. B., & Hubberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. California : Sage Publications.Morton, M. H., & Montgomery, P. (2013). Youth Empowerment Programs for Improving Adolescents’ Self-Efficacy and Self-Esteem: A Systematic Review. Research on Social Work Practice, 23(1), 22–33. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1049731512459967Mulyana, D. (2014). Ilmu Komunikasi : Suatu Pengantar. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya.Outwhaite, W. (2008). Pemikiran Sosial Modern. Kencana Prenada Media.Parsons, R. J., James, D. J., & Santos, H. H. (1994). The Integration of Social Work Practice. California : Brooks/Cole.Pasban, M., & Nojedeh, S. H. (2016). A Review of the Role of Human Capital in the Organization. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230(May), 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sbspro.2016.09.032Paton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Santi, M. R., Koagouw, F., & Mingkid, E. (2015). Pola Komunikasi Anakanak Delinkuen Pada Keluarga Broken Home di Kelurahan Karombasan Selatan Kecamatan Wanea Kota Manado. “Acta Diurna,” IV(4).Sheehan, H. (2010). The “Broken Home” or Broken Society A Sociological Study of Family Structure and Juvenile Delinquency. Social Science Department,College of Liberal Arts California Polytechnic State University.Shirky, C. (2012). How The Internet Will (One Day) Transform Government. TEDGlobal. TED. comSingh, R. (2001). Social Movements, Old and New: A Post-Modernist Critique. SAGE Publications Pvt. Ltd.Snow, D. (2004). Framing Process, Ideology and Discursive Fields. In D. Snow, S. A. Soule, & Hanspeter Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 380–412). Blackwell Publishing.Stoltz, G. P. (1997). Adversity Quotient Turning Group for The Psychology of Obstacles into Opportunities. New Mathematics Education. NewYork: John Willey & Sons.Suharto, E. (2010). Membangun Masyarakat Memberdayakan Rakyat : Kajian Strategis Pembangunan Kesejahteraan Sosial & Pekerjaan Sosial. Bandung :Refika Aditama.Sztompka, P. (2005). Sosiologi Perubahan Sosial. Jakarta : Prenada Media.Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2006). Pembangunan Ekonomi. Jakarta : Erlangga.Vasi, I. B., & Suh, C. S. (2016). Online activities, spatial proximity, and the diffusion of the Occupy Wall Street movement in the United States. Mobilization, 21(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086- 671X-22-2-139Vegh, S. (2003). Classifying Forms of Online Activism: The Case of Cyberprotests Against The World Bank. In M. McCaughey & M. D. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice (pp. 71–96). Routledge.Willis, S. (2009). Konseling Keluarga (Family Counseling) Suatu Upaya Anggota Keluarga Memecahkan Masalah Komunikasi didalam Sistem Keluarga. Bandung: Alfabeta.Wood, J. L., & Jackson, M. (1982). Social Movements:Development, Participation, and Dynamics. Wadsworth Publishing Company. World Health Organization 2015. Adolescent Development: Topics at Glance. 2015. Retrieved November 30,2017,from www.who.int/maternal_child_ adolescent/ topics/adolescence/ dev/en/#)Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment T h e o r y : P s y c h o l o g i c a l , Organizational and Community Levels of Analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook on Community Psychology. New York: Plenum Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-04

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): ETTISAL: Journal of Communication

Section

Articles

License

In order to be accepted and published by Ettisal : Journal of Communication, author(s) submitting the article manuscript should complete all the review stages. By submitting the manuscript the author(s) agreed to these following terms:

1.   The copyright of received articles shall be assigned to [Ettisal : Journal of Communication] as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish articles in various forms (including reprints). [Ettisal : Journal of Communication] maintain the publishing rights to the published articles.

2.   Authors are permitted to disseminate published article by sharing the link/DOI of the article at [Ettisal : Journal of Communication]. authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from [Ettisal : Journal of Communication] with an acknowledgement of initial publication to this journal.

3.   Users/public use of this website will be licensed to CC BY-NC-SA (Attribution & Non-Commercial-ShareAlike)