Analysis of DSN-MUI Fatwa for 2000-2022 Concerning Sharia Banking: Review of Sociology of Law and Istinbath Islamic Law

Authors

  • Wahyudi UIN Antasari Banjarmasin, Indonesia
  • Hafiz Anshary UIN Antasari Banjarmasin, Indonesia
  • Sukarni UIN Antasari Banjarmasin, Indonesia

Keywords:

DSN-MUI, Fatwa, Istinbath, Sociology of Law

Abstract

From 2000 to June 2022, DSN-MUI has issued 152 fatwa products. DSN-MUI uses three approaches in the fatwa determination process, namely  the nash qath'i approach, the qauli (bayani) approach, and the manhaji approach. Despite having  the legal istinbath  method, there are still many people questioning the DSN-MUI fatwa product. DSN-MUI is seen as preferring  the opinion of ashlah (more beneficial) than the opinion of arjah (stronger). Based on the above, it is important to examine the sociological relationship between the background of the DSN-MUI fatwa and the DSN-MUI fatwa istinbath method and its implications for fatwa products. Samples of DSN-MUI fatwa examined 31 fatwa. The objectives of this study are, to analyzing sociological relations that affect the DSN-MUI fatwa for 2000-2022 concerning sharia banking, and analyze the pattern of DSN-MUI fatwa for 2000-2022 concerning sharia banking in the perspective of Islamic legal institutions. This research is empirical and normative research. Empirical research is used to examine the sociological relationship between fatwa and external factors that have the potential to influence them, while normative research is used to examine the suitability of fatwa with the concept of Islamic legal istinbath. The conclusions and findings of this study are, external factors, both mustafti, PBI, POJK, and PMA KHES do not affect the pattern of DSN-MUI fatwa for 2000-2022 concerning sharia banking studied. On the other hand, DSN-MUI fatwa are absorbed in PBI, POJK, and KHES in sharia contracts. The pattern of DSN-MUI fatwa for 2000-2022 concerning sharia banking studied predominantly uses the manhaji approach (21 fatwa or  67,70%), followed by  qath'i and bayani (6 fatwa or 19,40%), and qath'i approach (2 fatwa or 6,45%).

References

Abdullah, M.A. (2021). Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary, and Transdisciplinary: Methods for Studying Religion & Islamic Studies in the Contemporary Era. Yogyakarta: IB Pustaka.

Abdurrahman, H. (2012). Suing That Sharia Banks Criticize Fatwa on Sharia Banking Products. Bogor: Al Azhar Press.

Adibah, A.W. (2016). Analytical Study of the Formation of Law Number 21 of 2008 Concerning Sharia Banking in the National Legal Political Perspective. An-Nisbah, 2 (2).

Ahmad. Fatwa Method Sharia Finance and Banking in Indonesia.

Amin, M. (2017). Solutions to Islamic Law (Makharij Fiqhiyyah) as Pusher New Currents of Sharia Economics in Indonesia (Contribution of DSN-MUI Fatwa in Regulation RI Laws). Malan: UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang.

Baehaqi, J. (2017). The Fatwa Paradox of the National Sharia Council of the Indonesian Ulema Council in Legal Regulation of Sharia Banking and Alternative Solutions. Al-Ahkam, 27 (1).

Dimyati, A. (2022). Sharia Financial and Banking Fatwa Method in Indonesia. In Reconstruction of Sharia Banking Fatwa Methodology. Pati: CSIF Mathaliʽul Falah Islamic College.

DSN-MUI. (2022). Fatwa. https://dsnmui.or.id/detik/fatwa.

Hadi, A. (2011). Position and Authority of the Fatwa Institution (DSN-MUI ) in Sharia Banks. Economic: Journal of Islamic Economics and Law, 1 (2).

Hardi, S.A. (2019). MUI DSN Fatwa and Development of Sharia Banking Products in Indonesia. An-Nisbah Sharia Economic Journal, 5 (2).

Hasnita, N.(2012). The Politics of Sharia Economic Law. Journal of Legitimacy 1 (2).

Hooker, M.B. (2003). Indonesian Islam: Social Change Through Contemporary. North America: University of Hawai Press Honolulu.

Ismail, N., Aisyah, S., Sup, D.F.A. (2020). Faktor Penentu Harga dalam Tinjauan Pemikiran Ekonomi Islam. Islamic Economics Jornal, 6 (2), 207-228.

Itmam, M.S. (2019). The Position and Strategy of Islamic Law in Legal Positivity in Indonesia. Yudisia: Journal of Legal Thought and Islamic Law, 10 (1).

Marzuki, P.M. (2017). Legal Research. Jakarta: Kencana.

Mudzhar, A. (1988). Fatwa of the Indonesian Ulema Council: A Study of Islamic Legal Thought in Indonesia 1975-1988.

———. (1999). Study of Islamic Law with a Sociological Approach. Yogyakarta: IAIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Naim, N. (2021). Interdisciplinary Approach in the Study of Islamic Law from M. Atho Mudzhar's Perspective. Al-Istinbath, 6 (1), 41–56.

OJK. (2022). Statistik Perbankan Syariah Desember 2022. https://ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/data-dan-statistik/statistik-perbankan-syariah/Pages/Statistik-Perbankan-Syariah---Desember-2022.aspx

Sup, D.F.A. (2020). Peran Amdal dalam Mengawasi Etika Bisnis Terhadap Lingkungan dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Syariah. Journal of Sharia Economics, 2 (1), 1-15.

Syarifuddin, A. (2014). Ushul Fiqh. Jakarta: Kencana.

Tarmizi, E. (2019). Contemporary Muamalat Haram Treasure. Bogor: PT Berkat Mulia Insani.

Thaba, A.A. (1996). Islam and the State in New Order Politics. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.

Webster. (1995). Webster's New Encyclopedic Dictionary. New York: n.p.

Zaini, Z.D. (2011). Implementation of a Normative Juridical Approach and a Sociological Normative Approach in Legal Research. Journal of Legal Institutions, 6 (1).

Downloads

Published

2024-03-06

How to Cite

Wahyudi, Anshary, H., & Sukarni. (2024). Analysis of DSN-MUI Fatwa for 2000-2022 Concerning Sharia Banking: Review of Sociology of Law and Istinbath Islamic Law. SYARIAH: E-Proceeding of Islamic Law, 2(2), 31–46. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/SYARIAH/article/view/11845