Review Articles Guide

Substance Articles Review

The reviewer will review the material according to the standard component of the article. If the contents of the article deviate significantly, please write down your comments.

  1. Title: A good title is a method. The title should be in accordance with the content of the manuscript is adequate, clear, precise and not multiple interpretations. Please advise the title if necessary.
  2. Abstract: Abstract should be stated briefly the purpose of research, methods, methods, and core answers. Remember the abstract is the most widely read part of the paper.
  3. Viewing References: Authors should credit the contributions of others relevant to the article through a citation. Citation in the introduction should be able to show innovation and novelty by author through gap analysis. Quotes should not be excessive.
  4. Objective: The purpose of the review of the article should be well defined and will be able to answer the hypothesis.
  5. Methods that can be used to achieve the right goal in order to repeat the work of the author. The tools, materials, hardware and software platforms used in the research also need to be elaborated.
  6. Clarity: Authors should write simple, concise and effective method information to be easily understood by the reader.
  7. Organizational delivery: The text should develop or explain the subject of the study logically and effectively.
  8. Duplication: The manuscript does not repeat the published work of the author or anyone else. Check whether the script can be shortened without losing content by uniting or more tables and images. Reviewers may provide some comments if there is duplication in the text.
  9. Calculation: In some randomly selected cases, reviewers are checked whether you can verify the calculations made by the author.
  10. Linking Text with Tables and Drawings: All tables and images must be referenced in text or paragraphs. The statements in the text must match the contents of the table and the image.
  11. Title Tables and Drawings: The title should state the content. Please advise to improve the quality of the table title or image.
  12. Title in table or caption: interpretation must be clear and decisive and use the correct SI unit.
  13. Graphics: The data to present the graphics or images should be accurate.
  14. Conclusion: The conclusion to answer the hypothesis should be stated adequately and clearly and must be supported by data and testing.
  15. Alleged: The author should clearly distinguish between allegations and facts.
  16. References: All references in the manuscript must be in the References. Minimum referral of at least 5 (five) pieces with 60% primary reference content (scientific journals, proceedings articles, reference books, thesis or dissertation) and published at the latest 10 (ten) years.

    Delivering the Review Results

    Once you have done the review, you can download additional article and file files. You can fill out a review form or comment or upload a file for editors or authors about your results. You are expected to provide quality article recommendations. Review should be completed in 4 weeks. If you need more time, you can submit it to Editor (informatika@unida.gontor.ac.id)